+- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora)
+-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: JFK Assassination (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-3.html)
+--- Thread: "ScarfLady"---TSBD building "employee"? (/thread-15259.html)
"ScarfLady"---TSBD building "employee"? - Tom Scully - 23-02-2017
Mark A. O'Blazney Wrote:Albert Doyle Wrote:No Larry, I'm telling you right now that if you go to the Education Forum thread you'll see the Martin Film motion picture of Scarf Lady and her build is slight. That precludes her from being "heavy-set".
When Gordon said he was moderating for quality of information and then banned me after I showed the better quality information (that Stancak has still been unable to answer) I think he violated my legal rights and I'd like to figure out a way to sue him. He can't get away with that.
Yes, you should sue that rounder, Albert. I'll represent you…… pro bono. How about that, sport?
Mark, your heart is big and I can't sit idly by, not reminding you that there has been no Ed Forum member posting as Albert Doyle and there is no living person
so named, actually posting on this forum. http://jfk.education/yates
"ScarfLady"---TSBD building "employee"? - Albert Doyle - 23-02-2017
If Tom put 1/10th the effort he does in to trolling me towards finding something useful like records of Sarah Stanton's height or photo we might actually get somewhere...
"ScarfLady"---TSBD building "employee"? - Tom Scully - 23-02-2017
Albert Doyle Wrote:If Tom put 1/10th the effort he does in to trolling me towards finding something useful like records of Sarah Stanton's height or photo we might actually get somewhere...
Translation:
Quote:I am not claiming that Albert Doyle is a living person, but on the Ed Forum I played his son, Brian, until Gordon committed a tort against me..... errr against my son, Brian.
"ScarfLady"---TSBD building "employee"? - Albert Doyle - 23-02-2017
You can tell somebody who is desperate to not admit they were wrong by how they try to rip the thread away to pure caustic ad hominem while ignoring the topic. These people do this because they are often rewarded for their actions by either having the thread shut down or victim punished.
How much do you want to bet if Tom actually used his skill for the productive purpose of this website and found Sarah Stanton's personal records from the Texas authorities that she would be around 5 foot 5 or 6 in height? Or that a woman of such height when combined with a wide girth would be described as "heavy-set"?
Afraid that I might be right Tom?
.
"ScarfLady"---TSBD building "employee"? - Mark A. O'Blazney - 24-02-2017
Albert Doyle Wrote:You can tell somebody who is desperate to not admit they were wrong by how they try to rip the thread away to pure caustic ad hominem while ignoring the topic. These people do this because they are often rewarded for their actions by either having the thread shut down or victim punished.Oh, tell us some more about OIC 'senior member' Janney's book, Mr. Doyle !!! Or am I on the wrong thread? Not that it really matters anymore.
How much do you want to bet if Tom actually used his skill for the productive purpose of this website and found Sarah Stanton's personal records from the Texas authorities that she would be around 5 foot 5 or 6 in height? Or that a woman of such height when combined with a wide girth would be described as "heavy-set"?
Afraid that I might be right Tom?
.
"ScarfLady"---TSBD building "employee"? - LR Trotter - 24-02-2017
The intended purpose of this thread continues to be an effort to achieve a proper identification of someone, aka ScarfLady, pictured/filmed in the TSBD entrance portal at what I understand to be about 12:50pm CST, or about 20 minutes after the DealeyPlaza shooting that fatally wounded JFK, and seriously wounded JBC. I do hope that it is not steered elsewhere.
"ScarfLady"---TSBD building "employee"? - Albert Doyle - 24-02-2017
Larry: I'm not sure who could identify Scarf Lady at this point. Maybe Frazier. Maybe there are some secretaries who were closer to these ladies that are still alive. The current research mob will help you as little as possible.
I wonder if Jim D is going to complain and get the thread locked because Mark ignored Dawn's directive that Janney was off-topic to this thread?
"ScarfLady"---TSBD building "employee"? - LR Trotter - 24-02-2017
And I make no claims of smartness, but it seems the signature comments are expressed with every post, no matter the thread subject. So, I suppose if a
need to express/post off topic promotions exists, just add it to and/or as a signature.
::director::
Although not yet produced, I am sure a provable proper identification of ScarfLady will be developed.
:
:"ScarfLady"---TSBD building "employee"? - Tom Scully - 24-02-2017
Albert Doyle Wrote:..............
I wonder if Jim D is going to complain and get the thread locked because Mark ignored Dawn's directive that Janney was off-topic to this thread?
There is no post of Dawn anywhere in this thread.
Begging your pardon, Larry. Unfortunately this chronic lunacy must be confronted in any thread in which it appears. Confronting it is the only opportunity to attempt to minimize it.
Albert Doyle Wrote:There's no excuse for not getting both Davidson's image and Scarf Lady in front of Frazier and asking him who they are?
The fact this isn't being done is a symptom of the poisonous corruption of JFK research by Murphy supporters.
What's next? A Lancer "Excellence In Website Moderation" award for James Gordon???
Larry: Davidson has proven his enhancement with his metadata. Murphy backers call for the metadata but then ignore it (or even censor it) when it shows up.
Albert Doyle Wrote:No Larry, I'm telling you right now that if you go to the Education Forum thread you'll see the Martin Film motion picture of Scarf Lady and her build is slight. That precludes her from being "heavy-set".
When Gordon said he was moderating for quality of information and then banned me after I showed the better quality information (that Stancak has still been unable to answer) I think he violated my legal rights and I'd like to figure out a way to sue him. He can't get away with that.
There is no current or banned member of the forum described by Doyle that included the membership or participation of Albert Doyle. Thus, the complaints quoted above are disquieting and distracting.
There is past posting activity on that forum of a Brian Doyle.:
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?/topic/23086-brian-doyle/#comment-334370
In fact, so-called Albert Doyle of this forum has been deceased for several years but the posting activity on this forum is consistent with the background details and internet activity of the decedent's son, Brian.
Quote:http://jfk.education/yates/
..........
Quote:Albert Regan Doyle - Sanibel-Captiva Islander......
[FONT=&]Feb 5, 2014 - Albert, the son of William and Gertrude Maye Doyle, attended...[/FONT]
[FONT=&]... Special thanks to Albert's son Brian who provided care for him at home. [/FONT]
Drew Phipps Wrote:So Albert, you admit posting on that other site under the name of "Ralph Yates"? Just curious why you would assume the moniker of an at least "partly-discredited-by-virtue-of-insanity" eyewitness to the Oswald double story. That strikes me as callous. Wasn't the use of the Ralph Yates name the topic of some other seemingly pointless post in the recent past? What are you up to?
PS: I don't believe JVB's story in the slightest, and if there are doubles showing up around here, she's one of them, according to her sometime-defender Edward Haslam...
Why is this a problem? Because posters here presenting under their actual names are put at a distinct disadvantage, before even considering "Albert's" prolific deviant disruption and distraction in these threads....complaining here, as the deceased Albert with regard to moderator Gordon's minimization of "Albert's" now seemingly interchangeable persona Brian's Ed Forum posting activity.
Presenting under our actual names here instigates a self moderating effect in each of us that is noticeably absent from this Brian now unabashedly and quite boldly posting here as "Albert," known to be deceased.
"ScarfLady"---TSBD building "employee"? - Albert Doyle - 24-02-2017
Larry:
I agree that the identification of Scarf Lady will add to our knowledge of the front steps. However the real issue here is incautious researchers have led to a useless focus of energy on a non-issue. Scarf Lady is almost certainly an innocuous woman employee of the Depository who has nothing to do with Oswald being in the lunchroom or Domino Room during the shooting. It is my view that if we could get a photo of Sarah Stanton that she would appear similar to the woman in Davidson's enhancement. I believe the woman in Davidson has wide-rimmed glasses too.