+- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora)
+-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: JFK Assassination (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-3.html)
+--- Thread: Who’s telling the truth: Clint Hill or the Zapruder film? (/thread-5374.html)
Who’s telling the truth: Clint Hill or the Zapruder film? - Albert Doyle - 26-02-2011
My conscience forces me to post that Douglass's claim that Dennis David, friend of Lt Commander Pitzer, saw what he swears was an entry wound near Kennedy's temple changes everything.
I don't know what to make of this because even if David saw what he says the angles still don't match for a shot from the Knoll that exits the right rear occiput.
Officially very confused now.
Who’s telling the truth: Clint Hill or the Zapruder film? - James H. Fetzer - 26-02-2011
The shot that entered his right temple created shock waves that blew his brains out the back of his already weakened cranium to the left/rear. It appears to have been fired from the above-ground sewer opening between the roadway and the surface of the Triple Underpass. See "Dealey Plaza Revisited: What Happened to JFK?", which is archived at http://www.und.edu/org/jfkconference/UNDchapter30.pdf
Albert Doyle Wrote:My conscience forces me to post that Douglass's claim that Dennis David, friend of Lt Commander Pitzer, saw what he swears was an entry wound near Kennedy's temple changes everything.
I don't know what to make of this because even if David saw what he says the angles still don't match for a shot from the Knoll that exits the right rear occiput.
Officially very confused now.
Who’s telling the truth: Clint Hill or the Zapruder film? - LR Trotter - 28-02-2011
Thank You!
Greg Burnham Wrote:Jim,
It is with mixed feelings that I come away from your account. It is truly well written and impeccably reasoned, yet haunting--since even its most basic implication is highly disturbing. But, even though the emotional price paid for knowing the truth is sometimes costly, knowing the truth is nevertheless cheap at twice the price.
The mountain of evidence now available to the public, and certainly available to the media, is more than sufficient to prove the case for conspiracy several hundred times over. Still, deception persists and the hood-winking of the American public remains the order of the day.
The question is, of course, "Why?" - The motivation for such malfeasance can no longer be reasonably assumed to be due to the perpetrators of a 47 year old crime still attempting to "get away with it" -- as the vast majority of those directly involved in its commission DID get away with it long ago and many, if not most, of them are deceased! Therefore, the ongoing cover-up must be related to "getting away with something" currently. And what is that "thing" that is so important to keep hidden from the light? What is it that would be revealed to the American citizen and to citizens around the world by this truth coming out?
To paraphrase L Fletcher Prouty as "Man X" in the movie JFK: "Why was Kennedy killed? Who benefitted? Who has the power to cover it up?"
I think the answer to those questions are still of paramount importance today. I further believe the answers are not nearly as illusive as many people have been brain-washed into believing. Perhaps the main issue for those continuing to obstruct justice has more to do with controlling the collective consciousness of the population than it has to do with impunity for the commission of a past crime.
If ever an admission is forthcoming as to the true nature of the events of November 22, 1963 in Dallas it is feared that a "revolution" of MIND will take place. Such a revolution in thinking will free the American people from the bonds of deception and restore to them a government of, by and for WE THE PEOPLE. Such knowledge is seen as dangerous not only for its catalytic effect, but also for the cathartic ramifications it would have on the establishment.
We the people would very likely clean house...and THAT is something to be feared by those in power.
Excellent work, Jim!
Who’s telling the truth: Clint Hill or the Zapruder film? - Jack White - 28-02-2011
Amen, Monk!
Jack
Who’s telling the truth: Clint Hill or the Zapruder film? - Phil Dragoo - 28-02-2011
As Greg Burnham has commented:
- I think the answer to those questions are still of paramount importance today. I further believe the answers are not nearly as illusive as many people have been brain-washed into believing. Perhaps the main issue for those continuing to obstruct justice has more to do with controlling the collective consciousness of the population than it has to do with impunity for the commission of a past crime.
Revisiting the origin of the Warren Commission one finds an allusion to Acheson. Acheson has been credited with inviting the attack by China and North Korea in June 1950 by omitting Korea from the stated sphere of U.S. interests.
One finds a similar gaffe by U.S. State Department official April Glaspy who assured Saddam Hussein that we considered Kuwait a regional matter, that is, go for it.
Kennedy was martyred and advisors were left in situ, to be joined by a half million combat troops at a terrible cost.
The Cold War was great for business and its demise brought Desert Storm. And a half million combat troops.
To be followed by Afghanistanwhich, remains open for business. Desert Storm begat Operation Iraqi Freedom.
Now the north of Africa is aflame; useful as distraction from the Bonfire of the Treasuries.
A million square-feet of National Security Agency data acquisition in Utah with impenetrable security perimeter and robust self-containment.
Proles cannot move a nail clipper through checkpoints which yawn wide and teflon-coated for a metric tonne of smack.
As O'Brien of the Inner Party explained to Winston Smith, it is about power, that boot on your face forever.
Posner the defender of the Afghan leader's brother against charges of being a CIA tool and drug smuggler (redundant or notyou decide) was observed gloating at the "death by natural causes" of Carlos Ghigliotti the FLIR analyst for the Davidians who was poised to prove 200 shots INTO the compound on the fiery tank attack day when flammable CS incinerated eighty souls and the shaped charge blew twenty children and women in the Concrete Room into the next world.
The towers came down, the blame came down with a drumming of war drums.
War, drugs, control. In every age, common elements produce the trancelike state.
Who’s telling the truth: Clint Hill or the Zapruder film? - Greg Burnham - 28-02-2011
Thanks LR, Jack, and great observations, Phil.