+- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora)
+-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/Forum-Deep-Politics-Forum)
+--- Forum: Black Operations (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/Forum-Black-Operations)
+--- Thread: MH 370: Missing Malaysian Airliner (/Thread-MH-370-Missing-Malaysian-Airliner)
MH 370: Missing Malaysian Airliner - Peter Lemkin - 15-03-2014
Special Conditions: Boeing Model 777-200, -300, and -300ER Series Airplanes; Aircraft Electronic System Security Protection From Unauthorized Internal Access
A Rule by the Federal Aviation Administration on 11/18/2013Previous ArticleNext Article
LEGAL DISCLAIMER
Font Controls
PDF DEVPRINTPUBLIC INSPECTION
Publication Date:Monday, November 18, 2013Agencies:Department of TransportationFederal Aviation AdministrationEntry Type:RuleAction:Final special conditions.Document Citation:78 FR 68985Page:68985 -68986 (2 pages)CFR:14 CFR 25Agency/Docket Numbers
ocket No. FAA-2013-0958Special Conditions No. 25-503-SCDocument Number:2013-27343Shorter URL:https://federalregister.gov/a/2013-27343 RELATED TOPICS
Regulations.gov Docket Info
Docket NumberFAA-2013-0958Docket NameBoeing Company final special conditions for the Boeing Model 777 airplane, Electronic system security protection from unauthorized internal access, Boeing 777-200, -300, -300ER, Notice SC-25-13-32-SCACTION
Final Special Conditions.
SUMMARY
These special conditions are issued for the Boeing Model 777-200, -300, and -300ER series airplanes. These airplanes, as modified by the Boeing Company, will have novel or unusual design features associated with the architecture and connectivity of the passenger service computer network systems to the airplane critical systems and data networks. This onboard network system will be composed of a network file server, a network extension device, and additional interfaces configured by customer option. The applicable airworthiness regulations do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for this design feature. These special conditions contain the additional safety standards that the Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness standards.
TABLE OF CONTENTSBack to Top
DATES:Back to Top
Effective Date: The effective date of these special conditions is November 18, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:Back to Top
Varun Khanna, FAA, Airplane and Flight Crew Interface Branch, ANM-111, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone 425-227-1298; facsimile 425-227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:Back to Top
BackgroundBack to Top
On August 21, 2012, The Boeing Company applied for a change to Type Certificate No. T00001SE Rev. 30 dated June 6, 2012 for installation of an onboard network system, associated line replaceable units (LRUs) and additional software functionality in the Boeing Model 777-200, -300, and -300ER Series Airplanes. The Boeing Model 777-200 airplanes are long-range, wide-body, twin-engine jet airplanes with a maximum capacity of 440 passengers. The Boeing Model 777-300 and 777-300ER series airplanes have a maximum capacity of 550 passengers. The Model 777-200, -300, and -300ER series airplanes have fly-by-wire controls, software-configurable avionics, and fiber-optic avionics networks.
The proposed architecture is novel or unusual for commercial transport airplanes by enabling connection to previously isolated data networks connected to systems that perform functions required for the safe operation of the airplane. This proposed data network and design integration may result in security vulnerabilities from intentional or unintentional corruption of data and systems critical to the safety and maintenance of the airplane. The existing regulations and guidance material did not anticipate this type of system architecture or electronic access to aircraft systems. Furthermore, regulations and current system safety assessment policy and techniques do not address potential security vulnerabilities, which could be caused by unauthorized access to aircraft data buses and servers.
Type Certification BasisBack to Top
Under Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 21.17, The Boeing Company must show that the Model 777-200, -300, and -300ER series airplanes meet the applicable provisions of 14 CFR part 25, as amended by Amendments 25-1 through 25-128.
If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness regulations (i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for the Boeing Model 777-200, -300, and -300ER series airplanes because of a novel or unusual design feature, special conditions are prescribed under § 21.16.
Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which they are issued. Should the type certificate for that model be amended later to include any other model that incorporates the same novel or unusual design feature, the proposed special conditions would also apply to the other model under § 21.101.
In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and proposed special conditions, the Boeing Model 777-200, -300, and -300ER series airplanes must comply with the fuel vent and exhaust emission requirements of 14 CFR part 34 and the noise certification requirements of 14 CFR part 36 and the FAA must issue a finding of regulatory adequacy under § 611 of 92, the "Noise Control Act of 1972."
The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in 14 CFR 11.19, under § 11.38, and they become part of the type-certification basis under § 21.17(a)(2).
Novel or Unusual Design FeaturesBack to Top
The Boeing Model 777-200, -300, -300ER series airplanes will incorporate the following novel or unusual design features: An onboard computer network system, and a network extension device. The network extension device will improve domain separation between the airplane information services domain and the aircraft control domain. The proposed architecture and network configuration may be used for, or interfaced with, a diverse set of functions, including:
1. Flight-safety related control and navigation systems,
2. Operator business and administrative support (operator information services),
3. Passenger information systems, and,
4. Access by systems internal to the airplane.
DiscussionBack to Top
The integrated network configurations in the Boeing Model 777-200, -300, and -300ER series airplanes may enable increased connectivity with external network sources and will have more interconnected networks and systems, such as passenger entertainment and information services than previous airplane models. This may enable the exploitation of network security vulnerabilities and increased risks potentially resulting in unsafe conditions for the airplanes and occupants. This potential exploitation of security vulnerabilities may result in intentional or unintentional destruction, disruption, degradation, or exploitation of data and systems critical to the safety and maintenance of the airplane. The existing regulations and guidance material did not anticipate these types of system architectures. Furthermore, 14 CFR regulations and current system safety assessment policy and techniques do not address potential security vulnerabilities which could be exploited by unauthorized access to airplane networks and servers. Therefore, these special conditions are being issued to ensure that the security (i.e., confidentiality, integrity, and availability) of airplane systems is not compromised by unauthorized wired orwireless electronic connections between the airplane information services domain, aircraft control domain, and the passenger entertainment services.
For the reasons discussed above, these special conditions contain the additional safety standards that the Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness standards.
ApplicabilityBack to Top
As discussed above, these special conditions are applicable to the Boeing Model 777-200, -300, -300ER series airplanes. Should The Boeing Company apply at a later date for a change to the type certificate to include another model on the same type certificate incorporating the same novel or unusual design feature, the special conditions would apply to that model as well.
ConclusionBack to Top
This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features on Boeing Model 777-200, -300, -300ER series airplanes. It is not a rule of general applicability.
The substance of these special conditions has been subjected to the notice and comment period in several prior instances and has been derived without substantive change from those previously issued. It is unlikely that prior public comment would result in a significant change from the substance contained herein. Therefore, the FAA has determined that prior public notice and comment are unnecessary, and good cause exists for adopting these special conditions upon publication in the Federal Register.
List of Subjects in14 CFR Part 25Back to Top
The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:Show citation box
AUTHORITY:Back to Top
49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701, 44702, 44704.
MH 370: Missing Malaysian Airliner - R.K. Locke - 15-03-2014
Link to the patent that was filed:
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=%22Freescale+Semiconductor%22&OS=%22Freescale+Semiconductor%22&RS=%22Freescale+Semiconductor%22
Article from Febuary 28th about JP Morgan not extending a revolving credit facility for Freescale Semiconductor:
http://money.msn.com/business-news/article.aspx?feed=OBR&date=20140228&id=17395474
MH 370: Missing Malaysian Airliner - Peter Lemkin - 15-03-2014
R.K. Locke Wrote:Link to the patent that was filed:
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=%22Freescale+Semiconductor%22&OS=%22Freescale+Semiconductor%22&RS=%22Freescale+Semiconductor%22
Article from Febuary 28th about JP Morgan not extending a revolving credit facility for Freescale Semiconductor:
http://money.msn.com/business-news/article.aspx?feed=OBR&date=20140228&id=17395474
I can't speak to the dollar/Euro/Yuan amount that patent is worth, but I skimmed it and it is IMPORTANT - it is a way of maximizing profits when making computer chips [microprocessors of all kinds]. Only an expert in the making of computer chips would be able to put a money figure on that patent, methinks....or maybe they already have.
MH 370: Missing Malaysian Airliner - Paul Rigby - 15-03-2014
[video=youtube_share;aUgWhUkkzr4]http://youtu.be/aUgWhUkkzr4[/video]
Leuren Moret: Flight 370 downing was Energy weapons demo; Rothschild patent scam; Payback for Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal verdicts vs. Israel, US and UK
http://exopolitics.blogs.com/peaceinspace/2014/03/leuren-moret-flight-370-downing-was-us-navy-energy-weapons-demo-for-putin-payback-for-kuala-lumpur-war-crimes-tribunal-ve.html
VANCOUVER, BC In an exclusive EcologyNews.com interview with Alfred Lambremont Webre, radiation and directed energy expert Leuren Moret, MA, PhD ABT, revealed that Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 of March 8, 2014 was, by the evidence, shot down by a newly unveiled U.S. Navy Laser Weapons System (LaWS).
According to Leuren Moret, the location of the downed Malaysia Flight 370 as first confirmed by an admiral of the Vietnamese armed forces was correct, while the U.S. and Malaysian media have published a continual stream of disinformation as a diversion to cover-up this military false flag operation by the U.S. Navy.
Motives for the false flag operation Why?
In the course of her interview, Leuren Moret elaborated on the apparent motives for this false flag operation by the U.S. Navy, including:
1. Response to Putin & demonstration of LaWS Weapons system - Leuren Moret details why the March 8, 2014 U.S. Navy LaWS directed energy system attack was in response to an earlier public test of the Topol missile system by Vladimir Putin's Russian armed forces, as part of a strategic dynamic unleashed by the confrontations around Crimea and the Ukraine. On March 6, 2014, two days before the attack on Flight 370, the U.S. Navy released a promotional video and major news release around its directed energy weapons LaWS system. Then two day later, on March 8, the U.S. Navy demonstrated its LaWS directed energy weapons system against Flight 370. The profile of available evidence as to how Fight 370 was downed fits the targeting profile of the LaWS directed energy weapons system.
WATCH ON YOU TUBE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Px87SP01eKw
2. Payback for Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal verdicts against Israel, U.S. & U.K. The interview details how the March 8, 2014 U.S. Navy attack against Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 was payback for genocide war crimes verdicts in 2013, 2012, and 2011 against Israel, U.S. and U.K. by the Kuala Lumpur War Crime Tribunal, founded by the former Prime Minister of Malaysia, Tun Dr. Mahathir bin Mohamad. A wide corporate and political network of top decision-makers in Malaysia, including the President of Malaysia Airlines and the Prime Minister of Malaysia, funded the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal.
3. Rothschild patent scam - According to Leuren Moret, there may have been other levels of motive connected to twenty employees of Freescale Semiconductor on Flight 370, headed for a conference in Beijing.
From ExopoliticsTV:
Four days after flight MH370 goes missing, a patent is approved. 4 of the 5 Patent holders are Chinese employees of Freescale Semiconductor of Austin TX. The fifth is the company itself. Each patent is divided into 20% increments to the 5 holders -
Peidong Wang, Suzhou, China, (20%)
Zhijun Chen, Suzhou, China, (20%)
Zhihong Cheng, Suzhou, China, (20%)
Li Ying, Suzhou, China, (20%)
Freescale Semiconductor (20%)
If a patent holder dies, the remaining holders equally share the dividends of the deceased so long as it's not disputed in a will. If 4 of the 5 Patent holders die, then the remaining Patent holder gets 100% of the wealth of the patent. That remaining Patent holder is Freescale Semiconductor. Who owns Freescale Semiconductor? Answer - Jacob Rothschild! He owns it through Blackstone who themselves own Freescale. Here's your motive for the missing Beijing plane - all 4 Chinese Patent members were passengers on the missing plane.
Patent holders can alter the proceeds legally by passing wealth to their heirs. However, they can only do that when the Patent is approved. (For me this is just another daft rule. It simply enables evil-minded scum the opportunity to commit skulduggery). So when the plane went missing, the patent had not been approved. As soon as the plane went missing, in other words 'operation successful' the Patent is approved & thank you very much! Mr. Rothschild once again gets the lot - 100% Patent holder, that is once the other 4 Patent holders are declared deceased. What a lovely world we live in! Blatant as you like!
================
"Freescale Semiconductor Employees Confirmed Passengers on Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370: Austin, Texas (Business Wire) Mar. 8, 2014: Freescale Semiconductor has confirmed that 20 of its employees were confirmed passengers on Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 en route from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing. Twelve are from Malaysia and eight are from China. The entire Freescale Semiconductor community is deeply saddened by this news. The company is continuing to monitor the situation and will provide more information as it becomes available."
Profile
Gregg A. Lowe, 51, is a member of the Board and our President and Chief Executive Officer and has served in these roles since June 2012. Mr. Lowe joined Freescale from Texas Instruments, Inc. (Texas Instruments), a global semiconductor design and manufacturing company, where he managed the Analog business unit from 2006 to June 2012. Mr. Lowe began his career with Texas Instruments in 1984 and held a variety of management positions with increasing responsibility in Texas Instruments' sales and business units. He currently serves on the Board of Directors of the Semiconductor Industry Association. Mr. Lowe earned a Bachelor of Science degree in electrical engineering in 1984 from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology in Terre Haute, Indiana. He later received the university's Career Achievement Award to recognize his accomplishments in the community and within the semiconductor industry. He graduated from the Stanford Executive Program at Stanford University.
Freescale Semiconductor Ltd
Compensation for 2012
Salary $553,846
Bonus $1,000,000
Restricted stock awards $3,388,057
All other compensation $8,659,186
Option awards $7,143,998
Total Compensation $20,745,087
Options Exercised for 2012
Number of securities underlying options unexercisable 380,098
Shares acquired on exercise 70,000
Stock Ownership for 2014
Number of shares owned 452,649
Texas Instruments, Inc.
Stock Ownership for 2012
Number of shares owned 5,381
References
Leuren Moret
http://www.leurenmoret.info
Navy will deploy its first directed energy weapon to the fleet; Laser Weapon System (March 7, 2014)
http://topinfopost.com/2014/03/07/navy-will-deploy-its-first-directed-energy-weapon-to-the-fleet-laser-weapon-system
EcologyNews.com
http://www.ecologynews.com
Leuren Moret: Flight 370 downing was Energy weapons demo; Rothschild patent scam; Payback for Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal verdicts vs. Israel, US and UK
http://exopolitics.blogs.com/peaceinspace/2014/03/leuren-moret-flight-370-downing-was-us-navy-energy-weapons-demo-for-putin-payback-for-kuala-lumpur-war-crimes-tribunal-ve.html
MH 370: Missing Malaysian Airliner - Lauren Johnson - 15-03-2014
Well, Ms. Moret certainly takes things all the way to eleven.
MH 370: Missing Malaysian Airliner - Magda Hassan - 15-03-2014
Either they, not necessarily the civillian authorities, know exactly where it is and what has happened and are not saying or they have no clue.
I still want to hear about the 5 no shows that checked in but didn't board.
Plus what was the burning falling thing that the oil worker saw? If he even exisits.
MH 370: Missing Malaysian Airliner - Albert Doyle - 16-03-2014
Lauren Johnson Wrote:Well, Ms. Moret certainly takes things all the way to eleven.
There's some warts with Ms Moret. There's like 200 miles between where this high energy beam allegedly took out Flight 370 and where the oil worker saw the flaming streak. Also the communications link went out about 14 minutes before the transponder. If a high energy beam were shot at Flight 370 it would have fried it on the spot where it lost contact and everything would have gone out. The techies say the transponder and communications were turned off manually. Also such an intense weapon would have fried the engine communication pinger too.
Mrs Moret said VietNam was brutally honest. Well if they were that honest why didn't they produce the wreckage for all to see? Such a high energy weapon would probably make some kind of signature on spy satellites. If the Russians could detect such an act they would have a field day on RT. Ms Moret also believes the US took out its own space shuttle with a high energy beam even though the cause was established as a chunk of ice impacting the wing that was caught on video.
Perhaps Ms Moret should contact Jim Fetzer?
MH 370: Missing Malaysian Airliner - Lauren Johnson - 16-03-2014
The Queen owns 12% of the planet? She orders hits and takes orders from The City. Her bloodlines go all the way back to the Mesopotamians and the Romans, etc.? Oh, please.
I see David of Guyatt has an essay of hers on his web page. But, isn't this jumping the shark?
MH 370: Missing Malaysian Airliner - Peter Presland - 16-03-2014
I'm not a big fan of Jim Stone. Far too cock-sure of himself in a rah rah Alex Jones sort of style for my money. However, this series of posts does explore (and nail??) the technicalities of the remote radar-jam/spoof transponder/remote control-fly-land capabilities of a modern US-NATO AWACS plane. Taking account of the apparent total blank on wreckage; the reports from the Malaysian government-military, the blatant photo-shopping of the pictures of the 'asylum-seeking false passport' passengers (same legs on both pics - oops); the boeing satellite techie monitoring of the engines; the cell-phones and many other bits and pieces, it seems to me that the theory with the highest probability right now is that the plane WAS hijacked (with or without the cooperation of someone on board) and HAS been landed on one of the US military's myriad lilly-pad outposts within range of the last known position.
Motive , and the fate of the 239 souls on board at this point are subjects for much further pondering - Jim Stone's WWIII being a possibility but provided with far to much of a slam-dunk 'it's obvious init?' style for me to give it much more than cursory attention.
Quote:NOW LET'S GET TO REALITY AND MOTIVEShttp://www.jimstonefreelance.com/
FACT: Flight 370 stayed logged into satellites which cannot be jammed without blacking out the whole portion of the world they cover (which would be obvious). True, if you thought of it you could jam the receiver on the jet quite easily, but that won't prevent the jet itself from maintaining an outbound transmission to the satellite, which if jammed would freak out the satellite because you would have to point a jamming signal at the satellite and overwhelm it so badly all the other planes would lose their connections at the same time. If you want your plane theft to be as secret as possible, you can't jam the sattelite.
One thing with the satellite is that it cannot tell where the plane actually is, it will only know it got signal. You would need three separate satellites all logged into the same plane to figure out where the plane was, and Boeing uses only one log in for obvious economic reasons. Boeing cannot find that plane, they can only say it was in fact alive.
FACT: The plane survived and landed somewhere. AND THE NSA KNOWS EXACTLY WHERE BECAUSE THE CELL PHONES RANG AND IT WAS NOT DEAD RINGING BECAUSE ONE PICKED UP. Ditto for the cell carriers, all of them which are no doubt owned by Kikedom and will keep their mouths shut. WE KNOW WHO DID THIS, "FAILURE" TO LOCATE THOSE PHONES PROVES WHO DID THIS WITH A SINGLE FACT.
FACT: The entire arab hijacker meme is so worn out and provably CIA that we know that fake passport story belongs in the trash. Add the faked photos for an additional laugh. Why did they push this line? Just like Awacs, all military systems have multiple purposes. When the military system is in the information spectrum in the form of a psy op, they are going to get as much use out of any situation as they possibly can. So while they waterboard those chinese military experts, probably as a precursor to getting military secrets before the waterboarders and their controllers launch world war 3, they decided it would be useful to try to frame up IRAN and blame the plane's dissapearance on them and use THAT as a reason to start the war they seeked to get an advantage in by kidnapping flight 370 and stealing the Chinese engineers.
FACT: The first thing to go with jamming would be the transponder. Jamming would also keep the pilots from radioing out. Jamming would have a harder time spoofing all radars, and THAT is the part of the plan that did not go perfect, as it would be expected. And I would guess that the plane was taken to a location, most likely Afghanistan, where NO ONE would say a peep about it being there and it would not matter if it was on radar or not.
In fact, once the plane was actually stolen, it would be possible to only jam it's communications, stop spoofing radar, and identify the plane as something else via a fake beacon on the Awacs plane to get it through another nation's radar shield without anyone knowing what it was. THAT is what probably really happened.
MH 370: Missing Malaysian Airliner - Paul Rigby - 16-03-2014
Albert Doyle Wrote:Lauren Johnson Wrote:Well, Ms. Moret certainly takes things all the way to eleven.
There's some warts with Ms Moret. There's like 200 miles between where this high energy beam allegedly took out Flight 370 and where the oil worker saw the flaming streak. Also the communications link went out about 14 minutes before the transponder. If a high energy beam were shot at Flight 370 it would have fried it on the spot where it lost contact and everything would have gone out. The techies say the transponder and communications were turned off manually. Also such an intense weapon would have fried the engine communication pinger too.
Mrs Moret said VietNam was brutally honest. Well if they were that honest why didn't they produce the wreckage for all to see? Such a high energy weapon would probably make some kind of signature on spy satellites. If the Russians could detect such an act they would have a field day on RT. Ms Moret also believes the US took out its own space shuttle with a high energy beam even though the cause was established as a chunk of ice impacting the wing that was caught on video.
Perhaps Ms Moret should contact Jim Fetzer?
Plenty of warts, Albert, and a few of them less than prepossessing. But the point isn't whether Moret's explanation is precisely correct, rather that she offers an alternative hypothesis worth examining, even if only to dismiss it. Her contribution does it least begin with & concentrate upon the two most important questions: what exactly did the US do; and what are its objectives?
And Moret hangs her hat on a real peg:
http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2014/03/navy-will-deploy-first-ship-with-laser-weapon-this-summer/
By the way, Jim Fetzer doesn't need to contact Moret, as he's interviewed her at least four times. One example:
http://radiofetzer.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/leuren-moret-jim-fetzer.html