+- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora)
+-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: JFK Assassination (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-3.html)
+--- Thread: Michael Piper and Final Judgment (/thread-9470.html)
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - David Josephs - 20-12-2012
Greg Burnham Wrote:David Josephs Wrote:Or MAYBE, he's just another gentile without a clue .... reaching for anything anti-Zion, anti-Israel onwhich to DEFLECT ATTENTION from the actual culprits.
I'm a Jew Mark and yes, we DO control the world... at least that's what the newsletter says....
6 million surrounded by 100 million and we STILL kick everyone's butt.
We've been here, partying, for almost 5800 years
Get used to it.
This doesn't seem like much of a party to me...
[ATTACH=CONFIG]4202[/ATTACH]
We've NEVER overwhelmed by numbers... but 6000 years from now, the party will still be going...
:rofl:
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - David Josephs - 20-12-2012
:wavey:
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - Magda Hassan - 20-12-2012
David Josephs Wrote::wavey:Could be waiting a while..... Hope you're not holding your breath there David.
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - Greg Burnham - 20-12-2012
David Josephs Wrote:Greg Burnham Wrote:David Josephs Wrote:Or MAYBE, he's just another gentile without a clue .... reaching for anything anti-Zion, anti-Israel onwhich to DEFLECT ATTENTION from the actual culprits.
I'm a Jew Mark and yes, we DO control the world... at least that's what the newsletter says....
6 million surrounded by 100 million and we STILL kick everyone's butt.
We've been here, partying, for almost 5800 years
Get used to it.
This doesn't seem like much of a party to me...
[ATTACH=CONFIG]4202[/ATTACH]
We've NEVER overwhelmed by numbers... but 6000 years from now, the party will still be going...
:rofl:
David,
I was being supportive of you as it seemed you were being attacked on multiple fronts. Don't gloat.
This subject brings no partying in Israel. Saying that it does only throws gas on the fire.
But, I don't really blame you for your cavalier attitude.
Israeli's only party after "the party" is over.
This one has only just begun.
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - David Josephs - 20-12-2012
Lauren Johnson Wrote:Greg,
RE this:Quote: Because you sure are acting like some pretty crafty operators here.
On page 58/#580, David Josephs says this:
Quote:How you can give this person ANY intellectual credibility when people like MOSLEY go unresearched, and GLADIO does not play in discussions of PERMINDEX
is, to me, absurd and requires more than the deflecting posts offered.
It doesn't take long before MS, is demanding to know what Gladio has to do with JFK assassination, as if this were the position, and fawning helplessness. 'What am I suppossed to do? Work me on this?'
My reading of this thread is that David Josephs introduced Gladio to the Permindex discussions to show the inadequacy of Mosely's analysis saying in so many words, 'it's so bad that he does not even mention Gladio.' It's obvious to a non-expert reader such as myself that Stapleton is pretending to be a partner to a conversation. That he is not. He is indeed an operator.
He should be put on moderation in lieu of being ignored which isn't going to happen. This shit has been going on for months.
Hi Lauren...
Appreciate the recap... I only post as the references you made suggest you don't see who Mosley is in this story... "Mosely's analysis saying in so many words..."
I submit that Piper relied on:
1) a report from informant 2-1-266,
2) THAT HE HEARD THAT one Thomas Mosley, (Which means 2-1-266 did not hear this FROM Mosley)
3) who ALLEGEDLY was in the process of selling weapons to Homer Echevarria - an anti-Castro Cuban member of an opposition group who's contact was "Mannie"
4) that Homer ALLEGEDLY made a comment on the 21st of Nov....... (does 2-1-66 hear this or Mosley?)
5) that "we now have plenty of money, our new backers are Jews, as soon as 'we' (or 'they') take care of Kennedy..."
as the basis for his book and conclusion, and the sum total of the evidence offered in defense of said conclusion.
http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archive/viewer/showDoc.do?absPageId=335994
Keep reading the report... the sheer obviousness of what the comment - if even made, ever - that it's in relation to the taking back of Cuba....
Lauren - you nailed it.
Cheers
DJ
[TABLE="width: 100%"]
[TR="class: tr1"]
[TD="class: td1, colspan: 2"]allegedly
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 2"][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="class: tr2"]
[TD="class: td2, colspan: 2"] adv
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="class: tr3"]
[TD="class: td3n1, width: 1%, align: right"]1.
[/TD]
[TD="class: td3n2"]reportedly; supposedly: payments allegedly made to a former colleague
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="class: tr3"]
[TD="class: td3n1, width: 1%, align: right"]2.
[/TD]
[TD="class: td3n2"]( sentence modifier ) it is alleged that
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 2"][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="class: tr2"]
[TD="class: td2, colspan: 2"] interj
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="class: tr3"]
[TD="class: td3n1, width: 1%, align: right"]3.
[/TD]
[TD="class: td3n2"]an exclamation expressing disbelief or scepticism
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - Mark Stapleton - 20-12-2012
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - Magda Hassan - 20-12-2012
David Josephs Wrote:I submit that Piper relied on:Yes. Chinese whispers at best. Vague, nebulous. Based on nothing much at all and no evidence. And Piper builds his house of cards on it. And Mark and Albert are willing tenants in the slums.
1) a report from informant 2-1-266,
2) THAT HE HEARD THAT one Thomas Mosley, (Which means 2-1-266 did not hear this FROM Mosley)
3) who ALLEGEDLY was in the process of selling weapons to Homer Echevarria - an anti-Castro Cuban member of an opposition group who's contact was "Mannie"
4) that Homer ALLEGEDLY made a comment on the 21st of Nov....... (does 2-1-66 hear this or Mosley?)
5) that "we now have plenty of money, our new backers are Jews, as soon as 'we' (or 'they') take care of Kennedy..."
as the basis for his book and conclusion, and the sum total of the evidence offered in defense of said conclusion.
http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archive/viewer/showDoc.do?absPageId=335994
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - Magda Hassan - 20-12-2012
Mark Stapleton Wrote:Told you you'd be waiting a while David.....
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - Mark Stapleton - 20-12-2012
Magda, you haven't answered my polite request in post #635 and #640. Why are you running away?
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - Mark Stapleton - 20-12-2012
David Josephs Wrote::wavey:
Why would I need you to post anything from Piper. I have the book. If I want to post something I'll do it myself.
The book makes an excellent case for Israeli involvement in the JFK assassination. Highly recommended.