![]() |
|
Sanders as a third-party candidate.....might it work? - Printable Version +- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora) +-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: DPF Articles Discussion (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-39.html) +--- Thread: Sanders as a third-party candidate.....might it work? (/thread-14690.html) |
Sanders as a third-party candidate.....might it work? - Cliff Varnell - 25-07-2016 Drew Phipps Wrote:The "Russia hacked our emails" story concedes an admission of authenticity of those self same emails. Yes, I'm shocked --shocked! -- that the DNC was wired to elect Hillary! Except that we knew that from the get go. What we don't know is how deeply indebted Donald Trump is to Russian banking/mob entities. Better to go with the Devil we know, as they say... Sanders as a third-party candidate.....might it work? - Peter Lemkin - 25-07-2016 Schultz is going to be booed out of her job tonight, I think. It is all up to Sanders tonight if he has the guts to demand back what was stolen by trickery from him - or not [I fear not]! Clinton deserves all the shame she is collecting like a magnet. Her shame goes back to her teens and only grew in its mendacity over time. Hey, she once supported Goldwater and recently [!] said how she'd like to use Kissinger as an adviser. She and hubby Bill were involved in dirty money, drugs, secret intelligence ops, murder, wars, taking away from the poor, giving more advantage to the rich, and other crimes of all sorts. This discussion of 'lesser of evils' makes no sense to me - evil is evil and I'll have none of it, thank you - or we only preserve the 'tradition' of 'lesser of evils', i.e. have one evil following another. America, is it the lesser of evil system....I think not...it is one of the most evil systems and powers and 'ya gotta start somewhere to end all this evil. No, we are not the only evil, but we are fully evil and getting MORE so by the day - the trend is unmistakable and must be reversed before life is erased and there are more wars and more misery for most - and more privilege and lucre for the few. If you thought the Republican Convention had fault lines within it, just wait until you see what happens at the Democratic Convention - and all well deserved too. Sanders as a third-party candidate.....might it work? - Cliff Varnell - 25-07-2016 My response in this Peter Lemkin Wrote:Schultz is going to be booed out of her job tonight, I think. It is all up to Sanders tonight if he has the guts to demand back what was stolen by trickery from him - or not [I fear not]! Clinton deserves all the shame she is collecting like a magnet. Her shame goes back to her teens and only grew in its mendacity over time. Hey, she once supported Goldwater and recently [!] said how she'd like to use Kissinger as an adviser. She and hubby Bill were involved in dirty money, drugs, secret intelligence ops, murder, wars, taking away from the poor, giving more advantage to the rich, and other crimes of all sorts. Sanders as a third-party candidate.....might it work? - Peter Lemkin - 26-07-2016 Peter Lemkin Wrote:Schultz is going to be booed out of her job tonight, I think. Right on the mark there!...but it didn't take rocket science to see that was coming....now will Clinton dump her too? Hardly matters, as Clinton will surround herself with the same type of persons in a variety of disciplines - from Grand Warriors through Intelligence Big Boys along side Goldman-Sachs types and the petty business as usual in the Empire corrupted. I don't see how the Sanders 'revolution' can continue within the Democratic Party and it was, IMO, always a mistake to even try to build it there. Look on the Left and an the Right there is common ground [that America has some HUGE problems and most are discontent at the decline in quality of life and salary, endless wars, fear (some real; most created) and an unease about the general path of society and its priorities. How the Left and Right react to these are different and their solutions are different. I don't see room in the DNP of today for a progressive movement - it has to move outside of it if it is to survive. I am disappointed at Sanders who made the mistake to change from a Socialist to a Democrat.....but to most Americans the term 'Socialist' is just another spelling of 'Communist' and both are dirty words and concepts - such is the propaganda. I don't know the exact equations for weighing evil, but I think on her worst day Clinton is awful, as is Trump. Perhaps on his worst day SANDERS is 100 times better than Trump; but on their average day my calculus is more in the area of Trump only being 2-3X as evil as Clinton [though they are evil in very different ways for the most part; but both elitists despite the rhetoric otherwise]. It is a sad day for America, but which day is not? I would love to see something like the '60's revolution' again in the USA and had some hopes for OWS and Bernie Sanders - but both have now folded. Will it surface again and fight on? I can only hope so, but it HAS to be outside of the establishment political system which is set up to co-opt progressive ideas and positive changes for the majority of the US and World. I think barring a scandal or unforeseen event Clinton will win...then what?...we have Big business as usual; wars as usual; banksters as usual; poverty growing as usual; an out of control series of black ops as usual. Do I think the platform changes pushed by Sanders will be adhered to by Clinton? NO! Those who backed Sanders will become very disenchanted, just as those who backed Obama have become. We need third and forth and fifth parties with the ability to elect members to Congress and the Presidency. We need a whole new polity and fast. In the end, do I think Sanders has made a lasting effect? Sadly, I think very little - though the discontent with the status quo is still there. The status quo is pro at deflecting discontent away from itself and sadly all too many are fooled time and time again (or simply confused or downtrodden into ineffectual effort). We need a peaceful revolution in America and the World and that starts with the best of the not-evils, not the least of the evils......what it really needs is basically a movement without central leaders. Obama promised all kinds of things and outside of a few positive domestic steps turned out to be a disaster and not as advertised puppet of the MI+C. Clinton, outside of a few positive domestic steps will IMO be worse than Obama - not a move forward, but backwards. Sanders is far from perfect - especially in his foreign policy - but compared to the others a breath of fresh air. Jill Stein of the Greens is infinitely better than Sanders, but few know the Green Party even exists and feel a vote for them is a 'wasted vote'. I say a vote for business/politics as usual is the wasted vote in the completely rigged system. Sanders as a third-party candidate.....might it work? - Magda Hassan - 26-07-2016 Peter Lemkin Wrote:Peter Lemkin Wrote:Schultz is going to be booed out of her job tonight, I think. Clinton hired Schultz with in hours of her sacking. What a good signal that sends out about her tolerance for corruption. ::hush:: Well, she was always working for Clinton any way. Now it is official. Sanders as a third-party candidate.....might it work? - Peter Lemkin - 26-07-2016 Great show today on Sanders, the Sanders movement, the current political system, and the one we want to have - watch the debate between Chris Hedges and Robert Reich. This is a enlightening discussion. Hedges is better and better, and hones in on the very nucleus of the problem....and Reich is undergoing an interesting nascent radicalization...if behind where Hedges is by a mile. It occupies the entire second hour [of the two hour show] of today's Democracy Now! http://www.democracynow.org/2016/7/26/who_should_bernie_voters_support_now Sanders as a third-party candidate.....might it work? - Peter Lemkin - 26-07-2016 If anyone wants to see why I support Dr. Jill Stein for President along with the Green Party, generally, listen to this debate here, again from today's especially good DemocracyNow! http://www.democracynow.org/2016/7/26/jill_stein_or_hillary_clinton_green One can also find lots of youtube speeches by Jill Stein and one can download the Platform of the Green Party [not a bad read!] Stein offered to step down to Vice Presidential candidate if Sanders would take on the Presidential ticket...but Bernie Blew It Big Time!....I believe the Green Party could have gotten second place out of four main players/parties, and damaged the stranglehold on America greatly. It would not have won the war, but it would have been a significant battle won on the long walk to freedom. https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/gpus/pages/121/attachments/original/1436484918/2014_Platform.pdf?1436484918 Sanders as a third-party candidate.....might it work? - Cliff Varnell - 27-07-2016 Further discussions with Brother Peter in this beautiful color. Peter Lemkin Wrote:Peter Lemkin Wrote:Schultz is going to be booed out of her job tonight, I think. Sanders as a third-party candidate.....might it work? - Drew Phipps - 27-07-2016 The worst might be yet to come with the DNC email hack Pamela Engel Jul 26th 2016 8:14PM http://www.aol.com/article/2016/07/26/the-worst-might-be-yet-to-come-with-the-dnc-email-hack/21439542/ Quote: The leak of emails from the Democratic National Committee has already rocked the party's convention this week, but it might not be over quite yet. Cybersecurity experts and Democratic strategists worry that more emails could come out in what might be a slow drip of hacked messages deployed strategically throughout the election cycle for maximum impact. "Like everyone in DC, I immediately searched my name," an unidentified strategist who works with the DNC told BuzzFeed News. "I wasn't in there, which I was happy about, until I realized just how sinister this leak actually was." They could have just listened to Assange, who said more damaging information was coming, last week. I listened to a story yesterday on NPR where a named lady expert, with experience "monitoring elections in Europe", made almost exactly the same points as these talking heads. Almost as if they're all using the same memo. I'll try to find a link to that story. Here: http://www.wnyc.org/story/behind-alleged-russian-connection-dnc-leaks Sanders as a third-party candidate.....might it work? - Drew Phipps - 29-07-2016 Reuters is changing its poll methodology to remove the word "Neither" from its list of choices. http://www.aol.com/article/2016/07/29/the-year-of-neither-why-reuters-ipsos-is-tweaking-its-u-s-pr/21441339/ Instead of "Neither/Other" it will offer "Other" in order to bring its poll results closer in line with other polls. It appears that inclusion of the word "neither" was garnering 3% of the vote. That seems significant, in view of the fact that both the Green and the Libertarian parties would like to participate in the televised debates and need a certain number of poll points to get there. Or the word "neither" could just express the general level of disgust with the whole thing, although an informal poll (conducted by me of certain people I know) indicates that about 50% of them are willing to express a general level of disgust with the whole thing. |