On Edwin Kaiser and Related Topics - Printable Version +- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora) +-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: JFK Assassination (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-3.html) +--- Thread: On Edwin Kaiser and Related Topics (/thread-12526.html) |
On Edwin Kaiser and Related Topics - Scott Kaiser - 29-09-2017 This is from me Pete, the rest above is all Chirs, and perhaps, you should get someone who's seen what I'm talking about over to Newman, that is if you want to solve the case as I have solved my father's. How many people have read FOIA documents that refers to someone involved in Kennedy's assassination? You probably have 100's of documents referring to someone involved right? This guy said this, and that guy said that, right? At a meeting at South Florida Research I was informed they are now up to 186 shooters. Can you imagine that? You know what I'm talking about right? Now, how many have read FOIA documents that details not just the event, but every bit of detail in how it was carried out? What do you mean Scott? I mean, men intercepting intelligence, taking photographs, carrying concealed devices, which according to every agent I've spoken to topically refers to weapons. Agents trying to escape, and exfiltrating three men from North of Del Rio, Mexico may be? And, Poyle's name all on the same documents. During the week ending November 23, 1963. TSB (Technology Strategy Board) Maritime Ops, OWWT (French in North Africa) holding elections in Miami on November 24, 1963 on who would be the next president of Cuba, but Fidel Castro "Boycotted" and disrupted that from happening. A recap of events from November 17-23 1963. And the plot to assassinate JFK in Miami. This is what I'm talking about, all this and more on just three little ole documents. Has ANYONE ever seen anything like this? Has any information ever come to light such as this in over 50 plus years of research? And, you don't want to acknowledge what's been written in black and white, you'd prefer the continued theories, bullshit and more theories as more books are written? No doubt 4 or 5 more books will find their way in on or before November. Truthfully, I can only find all this information and more on (3) documents of the millions of pages already out there that discusses Kennedy's assassination in full detail, NOW that's what I'm talking about! And, the truth will set me free! On Edwin Kaiser and Related Topics - Scott Kaiser - 29-09-2017 I challenge John Newman, whose name has now come up more than once to interpret, decipher, analyze and dictate in detail the three (3) documents that have been 'freely given.' I'm not asking for me, so, please my haters! Get off it! But, for the respect of the riderless horseman. Let's settle this once and for all, isn't that what this is about? Him, not you or me! Hell, I don't even want the recognition, y'all can take all the glory, I just want anyone who is not willing to hide behind some curtain to shed some light on these documents is all I'm saying (for YOUR side.) That would be my reward, [corroboration,] to be, or not to be, that is the question. It's as simple as asking, do these documents discuss the "Big Event" or not, how hard can that be? If Newman says it's a no go, or both he and Chris agree, then I will accept, but if Newman agrees with Chris, then, YOU the researchers may have it and do with it what YOU will see how that works? I'm finished, and do not give Newman Chris' assessment, let him do his own so there will be no influence, we shall see. After all, these documents have got to mean something, how can information of this caliber be so vague? :: + ::rofl:: = :: On Edwin Kaiser and Related Topics - Scott Kaiser - 29-09-2017 The condition is, the documents go to Newman, and only him. And, if you have any curiosity whatsoever, please do get back in-touch with me, and let me know what Newman, and ONLY Newman says. Thanks! On Edwin Kaiser and Related Topics - Peter Lemkin - 03-10-2017 No problemo....but you have to contact me with the docs to Neuman only. On Edwin Kaiser and Related Topics - Scott Kaiser - 04-10-2017 Peter Lemkin Wrote: Sure I have NO problem sharing! Here I go, again! I did send Newman a message on FB and if unless he checks his messages on FB he won't get it, but if he's a regular on FB but is one of those people who enjoys reading others posts, but rarely posts himself, I understand, there are many who does that. Quote:Dear Mr. Kaiser, On Edwin Kaiser and Related Topics - Scott Kaiser - 04-10-2017 I suppose I can say, my father is who solved Kennedy's assassination? On Edwin Kaiser and Related Topics - Scott Kaiser - 04-10-2017 Newman said in his interview you posted above talking about the CIA, and I quote; "(Carefully) crafted secret documents and memos." That's all I needed to hear as his words have carefully corroborated what Chris wrote me, thank you! My father is the first person to have successfully solved Kennedy's assassination, not just by his words in the letters he wrote, but also by the very people he himself was linked to, and the FOIA documents that corroborate it, thank you! The ONLY thing that matters is what I know, and what my father knew, everything else, doesn't matter. Scott Kaiser On Edwin Kaiser and Related Topics - Peter Lemkin - 04-10-2017 These images are too small to be readable. They need to be scanned at a higher bit rate. If you want, send me better scans and I'll send them to Neuman. Since Neuman doesn't know you, he will likely not even look at the documents. You need someone who he knows to present them to him. He is working on several books and lectures at the same time, and usually only responds to those he knows of. With all due respect, I don't think any one person 'solved' the JFK assassination. It has been a collaborative effort by an often unorganized group of researchers over the time since Dallas....and there are still gaps in our knowledge, although the general outline is certainly known. On Edwin Kaiser and Related Topics - Scott Kaiser - 04-10-2017 Peter Lemkin Wrote:These images are too small to be readable. They need to be scanned at a higher bit rate. If you want, send me better scans and I'll send them to Neuman. Pete- I see I have to be the one who goes that extra mile. If you've downloaded my PDF (which you've done) you would notice the very same documents are in there, if you've followed me around on Facebook (like everyone else does) you would see I have posted them, so please don't make it sound as those I'm trying to pass on a set of documents no one can read, that's crap! A response to your second sentence, perhaps, YOU oh mighty whatever you are should get ahold of your buddy Neuman and tell him "Scott's father already solved the Kennedy hit" I expect Neuman to not know who I am, as I've said in the past, I'm no one, but my father? How could he not know who he was? Just mention his name Pete, you'll do just fine! Do you honestly believe I care what anyone is doing or how many lectures or books someone writes about JFK? Do you think I only took Chirs' word for it? You do know I keep (in-touch) with many, many CIA agents who have interpreted these documents to be a direct result of leading into Kennedy's assassination, and the aftermath? Within these three documents alone displays the date, time and place as the author "carefully replaces the date for Dallas" as Chris says, the first page discusses the plot to kill Kennedy in Miami, this was AFTER his Tampa trip, and where did Kennedy go after his Miami trip, oh yeah TEXAS! Are folks following what I'm saying so far? The second page refers to Richard Poyle in Mexico, he arrived there on November 21, 1963. The plot to hold elections on November 24, 1963 for a FREE Cuba, and how was Cuba suppose to get free? Why these elections were being held by exile lawyers who were expecting to rewrite the Cuban Constitution after the invasion of Cuba and the killing of Castro, but... How was Cuba going to get invaded? AFTER Jack was whacked, right? Are you with me so far? HOWEVER! Fidel Castro knew 'exactly' what was going on in Miami, therefore, he, (Castro) sent his lawyers from Havana to 'boycott' the before the elections took place. Fidel Castro made sure to deliver his speech on November 23, 1963 the day AFTER Kennedy got whacked, Castro's speech was given the day BEFORE these elections were to take place to disrupt any elections from taking place, or Cuba from getting invaded, oh well, shit happens. Fidel was very smart to do what he did without hesitation or ignoring the fact Jack just got whacked, very smart of Fidel to do what he did indeed. I mean, how many other heads of state around the world also gave a speech the day AFTER Jack got whacked? Which kept his country from getting invaded. Do you believe the three and a half speech Castro gave about Kennedy the day after the assassination was something he just whipped up? I know what I have, and what I found, I know what my father had and why my father went directly to Richard Poyle of all men he could've approached, and Poyle just returned from Cuban prison? How about that? How would my father know if Poyle was CIA? I bet Neumen doesn't know anything about any of this stuff, but, if he does know how to read documents I pose the challenge for him to dictate 'in detail' exactly what those documents are saying. I already know. I'm not on nobody's sides, and that's the beauty of this, now, you may take the information I've FREELY given you, and do with it what you will, gee, where did I hear that before? Use it for what it's worth, and put some of that intelligence to work, or, you and everyone else may continue ignoring the facts while everyone displays their broad ignorance as they continue to write theory after theory. The choice is yours! Scott Kaiser On Edwin Kaiser and Related Topics - Peter Lemkin - 05-10-2017 I do not go on facebook - never have. The images you uploaded here are too small to be read. |