+- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora)
+-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: JFK Assassination (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-3.html)
+--- Thread: A Thought Regarding QJ/WIN and the Doppelganger Gambit (/thread-10305.html)
A Thought Regarding QJ/WIN and the Doppelganger Gambit - Charles Drago - 10-02-2013
We have noted that like many code/war names, "Maurice Bishop" was utilized by more than one individual.
For some or all of the intelligence-related purposes served by the doppelganger gambit, is it not likely that the designation QJ/WIN would have been assigned to two -- or more -- individuals, perhaps even simultaneously?
So when we ask, for instance, if QJ/WIN was Moise Maschkivitzan or Jose Marie Andre Mankel (two of many candidates), might we consider responding in the affirmative?
A Thought Regarding QJ/WIN and the Doppelganger Gambit - Phil Dragoo - 11-02-2013
Per Harvey's notes QJ/WIN testified at the trial of Marshal Pétain.
Do we see a QJ/Win candidate in the witnesses listed in this account of the trial:
http://www.marechal-petain.com/versionanglaise/proces.htm
Or is this a manufactured item used by Harvey to mislead.