BBC's Biased Coverage of 9-11 Goes To Court In UK Feb 25! - Printable Version +- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora) +-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: 911 (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-6.html) +--- Thread: BBC's Biased Coverage of 9-11 Goes To Court In UK Feb 25! (/thread-10322.html) Pages:
1
2
|
BBC's Biased Coverage of 9-11 Goes To Court In UK Feb 25! - Peter Lemkin - 18-02-2013 AE911Truth Evidence Goes to Court Feb 25, 2013 Can 9/11 truth history be made in a simple building like the Horsham Magistrates' Court? On February 25, in the small town of Horsham in the United Kingdom, there will be a rare and potentially groundbreaking opportunity for the 9/11 truth movement. Three hours of detailed 9/11 evidence is to be presented and considered in a court of law where the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) will be challenged over the inaccurate and biased manner in which it has portrayed the events and evidence of 9/11. Over the last 16 months, BBC has been challenged strongly by individuals in the UK over two documentaries that they showed in September 2011 as part of the tenth anniversary of 9/11, namely 9/11: Conspiracy Road Trip' and The Conspiracy Files: 9/11 Ten Years On'. Formal complaints were lodged with BBC over the inaccuracy and bias of these documentaries, which, according to 9/11 activists, was in breach of the operating requirements of BBC through their Royal Charter and Agreement' with the British public. This document requires BBC to show information that is both accurate and impartial. These complaints were supported by the US-based educational charity Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth), which submitted detailed scientific evidence to BBC to buttress the complaints. The evidence focuses in particular on the confirmed free-fall of WTC 7 and NIST's 2008 admission of this fact. In addition, over 300 AE911Truth petition signers supported these complaints by sending letters to BBC, requesting that BBC show this evidence to the public. As a continuation of this process with BBC, documentary film maker Tony Rooke has decided to take a personal stand on this issue. People in the United Kingdom are required to pay an annual TV licence fee which is used to fund BBC's operations. Tony has refused to pay his TV licence fee on the basis of specific anti-terrorism legislation. Section 15 of the UK Terrorism Act 2000, Article 3, states that it is offence to provide funds if there is a reasonable cause to suspect that those funds may be used for the purposes of terrorism. Tony's claim is that BBC has withheld scientific evidence which demonstrates that the official version of the events of 9/11 is not possible and that BBC has actively attempted to discredit those people attempting to bring this evidence to the public. According to Rooke, by doing this, BBC is supporting a cover-up of the true events of 9/11 and is therefore potentially supporting those terrorist elements who were involved in certain aspects of 9/11 who have not yet been identified and held to account. Rooke has been charged with a crime for not paying his TV Licence Fee. However, he has lodged a legal challenge to this charge and has now been successful in being granted an appearance in a Magistrate's court, where he has three hours available to present his evidence to defend himself against the charge. Tony has put together a formidable team to support him in presenting the evidence, including the following two outstanding 9/11 researchers: Dr. Niels Harrit is a Professor of Chemistry at the University of Copenhagen and is one of the world's leading experts on the scientific evidence that contradicts the official story of 9/11. Professor Harrit's team of scientists in Copenhagen proved that there was nano-engineered thermitic residue, both ignited and unignited, throughout the dust of the three WTC towers. He led the team and published the peer-reviewed study in an official scientific journal. He is also an expert on the other aspects of scientific evidence indicating controlled demolition of the three towers. Professor Harrit was interviewed for a major documentary with BBC in 2011 where BBC clearly attempted to harass and discredit him rather than look at the scientific evidence, which was devastating to the official story of the destruction of the Twin Towers. Professor Harrit's team took the precautionary step of recording this interview, as well as the interaction before and after the interview, which clearly shows the harassment and highly inappropriate conduct by BBC Tony Farrell Former UK intelligence official Tony Farrell has publicly questioned the official 9/11 story, and has been granted 3 hours to present the 9/11 evidence in a UK court of law. Tony Farrell is a former Intelligence Analyst for the South Yorkshire Police Department. He was fired in 2010 because he felt compelled by his conscience to tell the truth in his official report and state that, due to his extensive analysis of the events of 9/11 and the 7/7 London bombings, he considered that the greatest terrorist threat to the public did not come from Islamic extremists but from internal sources within the US and British establishment. He is now dedicating his life to helping to expose the evidence and he is challenging his dismissal through international court. Other members of Rooke's presentation team include: Ian Henshall: Leading UK author on 9/11 and founder of the UK group Re-investigate 9/11' Ray Savage: Former counterterrorism officer who demonstrates the official 9/11 story is not true Peter Drew: UK AE911Truth Action Group Facilitator In addition to these presenters, there are detailed written testimonies of evidence and support from four other 9/11 researchers which will be deployed to bolster to Tony's defence: Richard Gage, AIA: Founder/CEO of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth Dwain Deets: Former NASA Director of Aerospace Projects Erik Lawyer: Founder of Firefighters for 9/11 Truth Jake Jacobs: Veteran US airline pilot and member of Pilots for 9/11 Truth The evidence about 9/11 that will be presented by the various individuals above has rarely, if ever, been seen in any court of law in the United Kingdom, so this court case represents a unique and valuable opportunity for the 9/11 Truth movement. We encourage all AE911Truth supporters and petition signers in the UK to attend this court hearing the more the better. An outpouring of support will strengthen the message that the 9/11 truth movement needs to be heard and that there needs to be a new and independent 9/11 investigation. The date and location of the hearing are as follows: February 25th at 10:00 am Horsham Magistrates' Court [Court 3] The Law Courts Hurst Road Horsham West Sussex England RH12 2ET For further information, please contact Peter Drew, AE911Truth UK Action Group Leader, at truthfor911 [at] hotmail.co.uk BBC's Biased Coverage of 9-11 Goes To Court In UK Feb 25! - Magda Hassan - 18-02-2013 Some one needs to do the same for their appalling coverage of Palestine as well. BBC's Biased Coverage of 9-11 Goes To Court In UK Feb 25! - Peter Lemkin - 18-02-2013 Oh, There is quite a list one could make for the BBC and all the major MSM in Oz, EU, USA and elsewhere..... Gee, I wonder if the CIA/NSA,MI5/MI6 and all the spookey organizations, et al. will be interested in this case Quote:Tony Farrell ....tell the Truth and get sacked.....what a world we live in! BBC's Biased Coverage of 9-11 Goes To Court In UK Feb 25! - Jan Klimkowski - 18-02-2013 As an aside, the stuff below is a complete disgrace. So, there's a one time Tory Cabinet Minister (Patten) as BBC Chair, and a recent Labour Cabinet Minister & Blairite tool (Purnell) as BBC Director of Strategy. There's your Gatekeepers. Quote:James Purnell to rejoin BBC BBC's Biased Coverage of 9-11 Goes To Court In UK Feb 25! - Anthony Thorne - 20-02-2013 "the major MSM in Oz.." Absolutely agree and the lack of interest towards conspiracy facts down here is appalling. That noted, someone working internally at the Sydney Morning Herald (owned by Fairfax, which also owns the Melbourne paper The Age) embedded the video of AE911Truth's 'Explosive Evidence' documentary on the front page of the newspaper's website just over a week ago, resulting in thousands of viewers catching it for the first time locally. I'm surprised Fairfax haven't followed it up with a subsequent ass-covering debunking hit piece. BBC's Biased Coverage of 9-11 Goes To Court In UK Feb 25! - Peter Lemkin - 20-02-2013 Anthony Thorne Wrote:"the major MSM in Oz.." That is amazingly good news to hear!.....wonder how that slipped by?....and who was 'that masked man' who decided to put it in?! BBC's Biased Coverage of 9-11 Goes To Court In UK Feb 25! - Anthony Thorne - 20-02-2013 When Richard Gage dropped by Melbourne a couple of years ago to give his multimedia lecture on the collapses, I had a chance to talk with the organiser, local activist John Bursill (a 9/11 Blogger regular). I mentioned that I'd given probably 2000+ DVD's out locally in Melbourne via a friend who worked at an (unnamed, sorry ASIO) store where the discs were left in the front doorway with slick covers (made by me) replete with blurbs, and covering just the highest quality documentaries. Bursill shook my hand and noted that he'd given an equal number out himself, and some of his fellow Sydney activists had given out just as many. I'd like to think it was only a matter of time before someone at one of the papers decided to slip a little bit of truth out, and the fact that the documentary was made externally to the SMH gave them a degree of distance and deniability about associating themselves with the story, rather than drawing the ire of debunkers with an editorial. Either that or the man with the mask slipped into their building one night, and departed just before the slowly approaching sound of jangling keys and a torchlight made it up the stairs. BBC's Biased Coverage of 9-11 Goes To Court In UK Feb 25! - Peter Lemkin - 20-02-2013 Anthony Thorne Wrote:When Richard Gage dropped by Melbourne a couple of years ago to give his multimedia lecture on the collapses, I had a chance to talk with the organiser, local activist John Bursill (a 9/11 Blogger regular). I mentioned that I'd given probably 2000+ DVD's out locally in Melbourne via a friend who worked at an (unnamed, sorry ASIO) store where the discs were left in the front doorway with slick covers (made by me) replete with blurbs, and covering just the highest quality documentaries. Bursill shook my hand and noted that he'd given an equal number out himself, and some of his fellow Sydney activists had given out just as many. I'd like to think it was only a matter of time before someone at one of the papers decided to slip a little bit of truth out, and the fact that the documentary was made externally to the SMH gave them a degree of distance and deniability about associating themselves with the story, rather than drawing the ire of debunkers with an editorial. BRAVO! If every committed activist gave out even 250 DVDs, that would blanket just about everyone. The cost of the blank DVDs is not so great, but to copy them in such numbers takes either great dedication or special machines! Great work! BBC's Biased Coverage of 9-11 Goes To Court In UK Feb 25! - Adele Edisen - 20-02-2013 From Peter's Post #1, article on BBC's biased news article, "BBC's Biased Coverage of 9-11 Goes To Court In UK Feb 25!": Quote:Dr. Niels Harrit is a Professor of Chemistry at the University of Copenhagen and is one of the world's leading experts on the scientific evidence that contradicts the official story of 9/11. Professor Harrit's team of scientists in Copenhagen proved that there was nano-engineered thermitic residue, both ignited and unignited, throughout the dust of the three WTC towers. He led the team and published the peer-reviewed study in an official scientific journal. He is also an expert on the other aspects of scientific evidence indicating controlled demolition of the three towers. When a highly regarded, reputable scientist such as Dr. Neils Harrit is attacked for his statements, one must conclude that he is onto some real truth and the facts of the matter of how the Trade Center Towers I and II, and Building No. 7, were not only brought down, but pulverized and vaporized into billowing clouds of particulate matter as well, right before our very eyes on 9/11, leaving nothing but 3 or 4 inches of dust on the surrounding streets and dust in the lungs of people. His views are also supported by the statements of many architects and engineers, experts on the design, construction, make-up, and ultimate destruction of such high-rise buildings. Adele BBC's Biased Coverage of 9-11 Goes To Court In UK Feb 25! - Peter Lemkin - 20-02-2013 Adele Edisen Wrote:From Peter's Post #1, article on BBC's biased news article, "BBC's Biased Coverage of 9-11 Goes To Court In UK Feb 25!": You're so correct Adele, for 'they' know that if the Truth prevails it is their 'World of stolen money and corrupt illegitimate power' that will be pulverized and vaporized into billowing clouds..... Here is a video showing what the BBC tried to do to discredit him and 911-Truth for their masters.....disgusting 'journalism' cum propaganda. |