![]() |
Morley v. CIA - Printable Version +- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora) +-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: JFK Assassination (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-3.html) +--- Thread: Morley v. CIA (/thread-10343.html) |
Morley v. CIA - Dawn Meredith - 21-02-2013 http://jfkfacts.org/assassination/morley-v-cia-jfk-at-issue-in-federal-court-next-week/#more-3023 This case is very importand and Jeff is to be commended for all his efforts. Dawn Morley v. CIA - Peter Lemkin - 21-02-2013 Dawn Meredith Wrote:http://jfkfacts.org/assassination/morley-v-cia-jfk-at-issue-in-federal-court-next-week/#more-3023 I agree, very important.....should be read. I don't have much faith in the US Judicial system anymore...and the makeup of this Court doesn't look 'great'....... but we must fight the good fight and say we tried our best to reverse the Fascist Coup that began [in its modern form] at the end of WW2 and has built and grown in strength ever since...to the point where we are all but a full blown fascist police state IMO. Cue Nemoller's quote... First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out-- Because I was not a Socialist. Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out-- Because I was not a Trade Unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out-- Because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me--and there was no one left to speak for me. Morley v. CIA - Adele Edisen - 22-02-2013 Morley has been at this since 2003, beginning with a FOIA request. He has had to wait some ten years for an answer. What "national security" are they, the powers-that-be and their minions, worrying about? The security of the murderers of President John Kennedy? Are they even still alive? I began seeking documents from the Secret Service, the FBI, and the CIA about my interview on November 24, 1963, by FBI Special Liaison Agent Orrin Bartlett and US Secret Service Agent John Rice in 1975 when I first learned of the FOIA from Attorney Jack Peebles. I received nothing but denials from these agencies and/or 'national securitry' excuses. In 1991 I spoke with Mr. Bartlett by phone and he encouraged me in writing about my experiences. He had retired from the FBI years before. On November 24, 1963, he had called his heaquarters in Washington, and other relevant FBI field offices ordering them to pick up Jose Rivera for interrogation. Where is a record of this interrogation, and why must it be hidden, even after fifty years of the public murder? I have waited over 37 years after my initial FOIA request for answers. Will the documents, if they still exist, be released in 2017? I rather doubt it because the truth of the Kennedy assassination, revealing that elements of our own government, members of our own military/intelligence agencies, and private businessmen, enemies of JFK, conspired to murder him. What would the American people then do, if and when they learn the truth? Adele Morley v. CIA - Peter Lemkin - 22-02-2013 Adele Edisen Wrote:Morley has been at this since 2003, beginning with a FOIA request. He has had to wait some ten years for an answer. What "national security" are they, the powers-that-be and their minions, worrying about? The security of the murderers of President John Kennedy? Are they even still alive? Interesting detail of your story I didn't know Adele [that Rivera was interrogated]!.....then it is even more surprising you were not on 'the list' to be eliminated for knowing pieces of the truth......Yes, even though he no doubt lied, the very fact the document has gone into some black hole indicates he said enough for those who cover up the truth to ever want it seen! As to your question as to what the American People would do if really shown the Truth of what happened in Dallas and since [although I think there is already enough proofs if they WANTED to face the horrible Truth!] - they would have NO choice but to change the form of government, and do a complete house cleaning....before it is too late....I begin to fear we now at the 50th are just on the cusp of the 'too late' point. Sadly. Morley v. CIA - Phil Dragoo - 22-02-2013 I just deleted Junk from The Church Lady, Subject line: "Morley v. CIA" I posted here in the JFK section this week Jefferson Morley citing a comment by Alan Dale in re William K. Harvey, a man Helms pretended to hardly know, a man who was a drinking partner of Mongoose associate John Roselli; the pair died within a month of each other just prior to the HSCA's tenure. The HSCA which CIA marionette Blakey centuries later would whine was misled by CIA. Surely Gaeton Fonzi and Ed Lopez and Dan Hardaway were stonewalled by Joannides. And Joannides' Cubans, made rabid by the intentional failure of the CIA op "Bay of Pigs," did much to sheep-dip Oswald the Communist Castro lover, having already been deeply stained by Angleton's false defector program--I mean, come on, Albert Schweitzer College, of all the colleges in all of Europe he had to choose the one Director Hoover and European intelligence could not find for weeks. The question may be asked what possible effect on national security can come of the acts of a lone gunman. Hence, why did Joannides stonewall the House Select Committee on Assassinations if it were the act of a lone gunman. Which leads us back to the start, to protect the agency which was party to the crime. Mr. Morley reports now being smeared by the arrogant--welcome to the world which doubts Bugliosi, which is to say most of the world, that portion with uncrippled perception but no power. [ATTACH=CONFIG]4354[/ATTACH] Morley v. CIA - Dawn Meredith - 06-04-2013 Dawn Meredith Wrote:http://jfkfacts.org/assassination/morley-v-cia-jfk-at-issue-in-federal-court-next-week/#more-3023 I am delighted that Jeff has joined us here at DPF. We need more like him to assist in the effort by the powers that be who are making a mockery- and worse -of the 50th. "The whole world is watching". Morley v. CIA - Magda Hassan - 20-06-2013 Excellent news! Quote:A federal court ruled Tuesday that my lawsuit for the records of deceased CIA officer George Joannides "serves a public benefit" and ordered a lower court judge to reconsider his decision to deny the award of legal fees. Morley v. CIA - Peter Lemkin - 20-06-2013 While that sounds like a good 'victory' and might potentially pay him back for all the legal fees; I don't see where it advances him or us any of the documents being withheld. On what logical basis [other than CIA knowledge - before, during, after - or involvement, or both] could these withheld documents harm what they like to misname 'National Security'?! Truman was no bright light, but he publicly apologized for having created the CIA after the War - one month after Dallas - to make his hidden point as to who he thought was involved. That, along with Ike's warning about the 'MIC' really says it all. None of the Agencies and Branches of Government and Military protect the Citizenry of the US or World, they protect their secrets and their work for their real masters.....which are not [as the Constitution would have it] the People. It was bad from the 'get go', worse after WW2 when these creeps never 'stood down' from a full war footing and even joined forces with some of the 'enemy', worse still with the JFK and other major assassinations, worse still with all of the government overthrows, false-flag and black ops; but nothing has beaten the hubris of this lot since 911! Can this be exposed and reversed? In time to make a difference? Stay tuned....and keep your shoulder to the wheel! Morley v. CIA - Phil Dragoo - 20-06-2013 There is something about the way the CIA has been functioning that is casting a shadow over our historic position and I feel that we need to correct it. http://www.maebrussell.com/Prouty/Harry Truman's CIA article.html [TABLE] [TR] [TD] [size=12]16 Questions
[/TD]On The Assassination[/SIZE] [/TR] [TR] [TD][/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD] by Bertrand Russell
[/TD][B]The Minority of One, September 6, 1964, pp. 6-8.[/B] [/TR] [/TABLE] http://www.john-f-kennedy.net/16questions.htm Paragraph Five: In the name of national security, the Commission's hearings were held in secret, thereby continuing the policy which has marked the entire course of the case. This prompts my second question: If, as we are told, Oswald was the lone assassin, where is the issue of national security? Indeed, precisely the same question must be put here as was posed in France during the Dreyfus case: If the Government is so certain of its case, why has it conducted all its inquiries in the strictest secrecy? Just as Joannides was up to his rictus grin in the assassination while presenting himself as Mortimer Magritte with a Green Apple Mask so, too, is the lone gunman a term of art for a cabal fiat executed by a host of winged monkeys many too familiar to us. |