+- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora)
+-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: JFK Assassination (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-3.html)
+--- Thread: UPDATE -- The Drago-Palamara Exchange (/thread-10365.html)
UPDATE -- The Drago-Palamara Exchange - Charles Drago - 28-02-2013
The following back-and-forth is available for review on:
https://www.facebook.com/SurvivorsGuiltVincePalamara
DRAGO: As you know, in good conscience we have put our recent differences behind us, Vince. And in the spirit of our detente, I'd like to ask you, cordially, publicly and respectfully, to answer the following questions within the next 24 hours:
1. To the best of your knowledge, did Lee Harvey Oswald, acting alone and not as part of a conspiracy to assassinate JFK, kill the president?
2. To the best of your knowledge, did Lee Harvey Oswald -- whether or not he acted alone -- aim a firearm at and discharge it with the hope of hitting JFK in Dallas, Texas at approximately 12:30 PM local time on November 22, 1963?
3. To the best of your knowledge, were any Secret Service agents, regardless of rank, complicit in a conspiracy to kill JFK in Dallas, Texas on November 22, 1963?
I sincerely thank you for your attention to these matters.
Peace,
PALAMARA: Thanks, Charles! To answer your questions above in order: 1. No ; 2. No- Barry Ernest's book has me convinced that, whatever role Oswald played that day, he was on the second floor lunchroom when JFK was killed!; 3. Yes, unfortunately. 1-3 are based on MY book, Ernest's book, Horne's books, and Douglass' book, primarily (but not exclusively). I told ya, Charlie- it is as if my 2007 "brain fart" never happened! Peace, Vince
PALAMARA: You have my permission to post this as my contract to the community
PALAMARA: P.S. I DESERVED your anger (and anyone else's, too) for my 2007 stupidity and for not thinking clearly then about the ramifications to my reputation, my RESEARCH (THAT is pretty important, huh?), and my (prior) conclusions. The "cult of celebrity" and my ego got the best of me. (And you can post that, too)
Credit is due: Vince indeed has proffered a "contract" of sorts to the JFK research community. I hope all of you will join me in extending to Vince the benefit of the doubt and respecting him for publishing his mea culpa.
UPDATE -- The Drago-Palamara Exchange - Phil Dragoo - 28-02-2013
Charles for posing and Vince for addressing the multipoint query resets the gyros, compass, and gps locator.
Justice is the destination of our cybercade.
From Greer's I BRAKE FOR SNIPERS bumper sticker to Elmer Moore's badgering of Malcolm Perry and depiction of JFK as "a traitor" to its destruction of its files there is ample evidence of treason on the part of rogue agents.
Lee Oswald has had a multiply-sourced alibi for his absence from the alleged "nest" as well as doubly-proved absence of incriminating cheek GSR, FBI "expert" Cunningham's fantasy of the Mannlicher Carcano's "tight mechanism" to the contrary not withstanding.
Vincent Bugliosi has affixed a certificate of his evil complicity to the cathedral of public opinion with a thousand and a half pneumatic nails.
Jim DiEugenio removed that despicable vandalism in a ten-part Retrieving History from Bugliosi's BP Oil Spill.
This chapter is now rectified thanks to the courage and clarity of Charles, Vince, and Jim.
On to Justice (though the icons fall. . .to fiery karma)
[ATTACH=CONFIG]4364[/ATTACH]
UPDATE -- The Drago-Palamara Exchange - Jim Hackett II - 28-02-2013
For a while this place or part of it was imitating the old snakepit of alt.jfk from a long time ago. In the Age of Dispute.
UPDATE -- The Drago-Palamara Exchange - Jan Klimkowski - 28-02-2013
We are all human, with strengths and fallibilities.
I have not had the privilege of meeting or speaking with Vince Palamara.
So, the following is presumptuous.
But I will presume.
I am aware of the challenges, the doubts, the occasional loneliness and horror of original investigative research.
In his exchanges, Vince Palamara has shown courage and integrity.
I salute him and hope he will continue to fight the good fight.
UPDATE -- The Drago-Palamara Exchange - Nathaniel Heidenheimer - 01-03-2013
Phil Dragoo Wrote:Charles for posing and Vince for addressing the multipoint query resets the gyros, compass, and gps locator.
Justice is the destination of our cybercade.
From Greer's I BRAKE FOR SNIPERS bumper sticker to Elmer Moore's badgering of Malcolm Perry and depiction of JFK as "a traitor" to its destruction of its files there is ample evidence of treason on the part of rogue agents.
Lee Oswald has had a multiply-sourced alibi for his absence from the alleged "nest" as well as doubly-proved absence of incriminating cheek GSR, FBI "expert" Cunningham's fantasy of the Mannlicher Carcano's "tight mechanism" to the contrary not withstanding.
Vincent Bugliosi has affixed a certificate of his evil complicity to the cathedral of public opinion with a thousand and a half pneumatic nails.
Jim DiEugenio removed that despicable vandalism in a ten-part Retrieving History from Bugliosi's BP Oil Spill.
This chapter is now rectified thanks to the courage and clarity of Charles, Vince, and Jim.
On to Justice (though the icons fall. . .to fiery karma)
[ATTACH=CONFIG]4364[/ATTACH]
------
I so wish it were possible to post the ten part DiEugenio piece around the internet. That way it could wet the kindling of lies before the Tom Hanks government arsonist has a chance to light them.
Also there would be huge interest given that Hanks is basically narrating a gross of government disinformationist films coming up.
We need to go wide angle to general audiences, but again nobody seems to want to do that but myself. The DiEugenio ten part series is ideal because even newbies can use it to grasp the major points of contention.
UPDATE -- The Drago-Palamara Exchange - Phil Dragoo - 01-03-2013
Nathaniel underscores the danger:
Hanks, widely known, highly acclaimed, seductively credible is the Magic Bullet Huckster for the Fifty Years of High Crime Gala.
Hanks' biggest gun is Bugliosi.
Jim DiEugenio has destroyed Bugliosi in detail.
At a time and place of his choosing the author of Destiny Betrayed which validated Garrison and indicted CIA's retaliation thereof will launch.
Tell the Magic Bullet-headed Jackass incoming karma.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]4380[/ATTACH]
UPDATE -- The Drago-Palamara Exchange - Vince Palamara - 02-03-2013
Charles Drago Wrote:The following back-and-forth is available for review on:
https://www.facebook.com/SurvivorsGuiltVincePalamara
DRAGO: As you know, in good conscience we have put our recent differences behind us, Vince. And in the spirit of our detente, I'd like to ask you, cordially, publicly and respectfully, to answer the following questions within the next 24 hours:
1. To the best of your knowledge, did Lee Harvey Oswald, acting alone and not as part of a conspiracy to assassinate JFK, kill the president?
2. To the best of your knowledge, did Lee Harvey Oswald -- whether or not he acted alone -- aim a firearm at and discharge it with the hope of hitting JFK in Dallas, Texas at approximately 12:30 PM local time on November 22, 1963?
3. To the best of your knowledge, were any Secret Service agents, regardless of rank, complicit in a conspiracy to kill JFK in Dallas, Texas on November 22, 1963?
I sincerely thank you for your attention to these matters.
Peace,
PALAMARA: Thanks, Charles! To answer your questions above in order: 1. No ; 2. No- Barry Ernest's book has me convinced that, whatever role Oswald played that day, he was on the second floor lunchroom when JFK was killed!; 3. Yes, unfortunately. 1-3 are based on MY book, Ernest's book, Horne's books, and Douglass' book, primarily (but not exclusively). I told ya, Charlie- it is as if my 2007 "brain fart" never happened! Peace, Vince
PALAMARA: You have my permission to post this as my contract to the community
PALAMARA: P.S. I DESERVED your anger (and anyone else's, too) for my 2007 stupidity and for not thinking clearly then about the ramifications to my reputation, my RESEARCH (THAT is pretty important, huh?), and my (prior) conclusions. The "cult of celebrity" and my ego got the best of me. (And you can post that, too)
Credit is due: Vince indeed has proffered a "contract" of sorts to the JFK research community. I hope all of you will join me in extending to Vince the benefit of the doubt and respecting him for publishing his mea culpa.
And credit is due to you, as well, Charlie. You are a valuable member of the research community. I DESERVED the butt-kicking you gave me online- every word of it. Vince :O) P.S. Thanks to everyone else here, as well
UPDATE -- The Drago-Palamara Exchange - Greg Burnham - 03-03-2013
Hey Vince,
You're welcome for the butt kicking you got on JFKresearch Forum, too!
Seriously: Welcome home.
UPDATE -- The Drago-Palamara Exchange - Vince Palamara - 04-03-2013
Greg Burnham Wrote:Hey Vince,
You're welcome for the butt kicking you got on JFKresearch Forum, too!
Seriously: Welcome home.
Thanks, Greg LOL :O)