Good-bye Dave Reitzes... - Printable Version +- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora) +-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/Forum-Deep-Politics-Forum) +--- Forum: JFK Assassination (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/Forum-JFK-Assassination) +--- Thread: Good-bye Dave Reitzes... (/Thread-Good-bye-Dave-Reitzes) |
Good-bye Dave Reitzes... - David Healy - 03-10-2013 crafted and penned by a forum member... http://www.ctka.net/2013/flipflop.html terrrrrrific job, Jim! Good-bye Dave Reitzes... - Tracy Riddle - 03-10-2013 Jim, you might want to make a little correction and add the name Delphine so newbies will know who "Roberts" is. Good-bye Dave Reitzes... - Tracy Riddle - 03-10-2013 Oh, and Mr. Reitzes, if you're reading this - the first conspiracy theory was put out by CIA-connected people. As Gerald McKnight writes, in regard to the early leaking of stories to the press about Castro being behind the assassination: "The unappreciated irony in this whole business was that the first JFK conspiracy theory to find its way into print was paid for by George E. Joannides, a CIA psychological warfare specialist." Good-bye Dave Reitzes... - Jim Hargrove - 04-10-2013 From the WAY BACK machine: ============== QUOTE ON ================== Jim Hargrove 1/10/99 Let's take a closer look at Dave Reitzes' posts of the last few months. According to the results a DejaNews "power search," posts made to alt.conspiracy.jfk by Dave Reitzes as drei...@aol.com totalled "about 15,000." Posts made by Dave Reitzes as ERX...@prodigy.com SINCE JUST BEFORE LAST CHRISTMAS totalled "about 14,000" posts. Since DejaNews breaks up long posts and counts them as multiple instances, these numbers are too high. Nevertheless, they are astronomical, and represent abuse of Usenet. But don't take my word for it. There is a long-established newsgroup devoted to the very topic of spamming and net abuse, and Dave Reitzes is a real fixture there. In just the last two months of 1998, his name appears on 19 different news.admin.net-abuse hit lists. Here are the DejaNews summaries: <QUOTE ON> Messages 1-19 of exactly 19 matches for search drei...@aol.com: Date Scr Subject Newsgroup Author 1. 98/12/23 017 Usenet Posting Summary (#6/2 news.admin.net-abuse. Usenet Posting 2. 98/12/23 017 REPOST: Usenet Posting S#6/2 news.admin.net-abuse. Usenet Posting 3. 98/12/22 017 Usenet Posting Summary (#5/1 news.admin.net-abuse. Usenet Posting 4. 98/12/22 017 Usenet Posting Summary (#10/ news.admin.net-abuse. Usenet Posting 5. 98/12/22 017 REPOST: Usenet Posting S#10/ news.admin.net-abuse. Usenet Posting 6. 98/12/21 017 Usenet Posting Summary (#5/1 news.admin.net-abuse. Usenet Posting 7. 98/12/20 017 Usenet Posting Summary (#5/1 news.admin.net-abuse. Usenet Posting 8. 98/12/20 017 Usenet Posting Summary (#7/2 news.admin.net-abuse. Usenet Posting 9. 98/12/19 017 Usenet Posting Summary (#6/2 news.admin.net-abuse. Usenet Posting 10. 98/12/19 017 REPOST: Usenet Posting S#6/2 news.admin.net-abuse. Usenet Posting 11. 98/12/12 017 Usenet Posting Summary (#9/2 news.admin.net-abuse. Usenet Posting 12. 98/11/20 017 Usenet Posting Summary (#7/1 news.admin.net-abuse. Usenet Posting 13. 98/11/15 016 Usenet Posting Summary (#6/1 news.admin.net-abuse. Usenet Posting 14. 98/11/13 016 Usenet Posting Summary (#10/ news.admin.net-abuse. Usenet Posting 15. 98/11/13 016 Usenet Posting Summary (#8/2 news.admin.net-abuse. Usenet Posting 16. 98/11/13 016 REPOST: Usenet Posting S#8/2 news.admin.net-abuse. Usenet Posting 17. 98/11/05 016 Usenet Posting Summary (#7/2 news.admin.net-abuse. Usenet Posting 18. 98/11/05 016 REPOST: Usenet Posting S#7/2 news.admin.net-abuse. Usenet Posting 19. 98/11/04 016 Usenet Posting Summary (#7/2 news.admin.net-abuse. Usenet Posting <QUOTE OFF> You can easily duplicate these searches yourself to see what I mean. Switching over to Prodigy on the account of "Marc Reitzes," Dave Reitzes has also been fingered by news.admin.net-abuse three times since Christmas. Here are those DejaNews summaries: <QUOTE ON> Messages 1-3 of exactly 3 matches for search ERX...@prodigy.com: Date Scr Subject Newsgroup Author 1. 99/01/06 020 Usenet Posting Summary (#6/1 news.admin.net-abuse. Usenet Posting 2. 99/01/05 019 Usenet Posting Summary (#9/2 news.admin.net-abuse. Usenet Posting 3. 98/12/28 018 Usenet Posting Summary (#5/1 news.admin.net-abuse. Usenet Posting <QUOTE OFF> One last thing. Does anyone really think all this abuse is being generated by just one guy? --Jim Hargrove Click here to Reply Jim Hargrove 1/10/99 Here is some more information on Reitzes' listings in news.admin.net-abuse.usenet from the "Usenet Posting Summary Daemon Process." These lists are generated daily. Below is the introduction, and Dave/Marc Reitzes' listing for January 6, 1999. Reitzes also made 21 other similar lists during the past 60 days or so. ========================== <QUOTE ON> ================================= Author: Usenet Posting Summary Daemon Process Email: u...@dsrs.nntp.sol.net Date: 1999/01/06 Forums: news.admin.net-abuse.usenet This data has been gathered by sol.net Network Services as part of an ongoing project to monitor Usenet trends and abuse. The data presented in this report is generated from data gathered by the DSRS Posting Research Service. Access to this service is free and is available to any individual or organization involved in the fight against Usenet abuse, including spam cancellers, Kenny-killers, ISP abuse desks, and Usenet administrators. It is not a free news- reading service. Please visit the URL http://dsrs.nntp.sol.net for more details. There are currently two items scanned: 1) "From:" header 2) "NNTP-Posting-Host:" header, if present All articles sharing the same header (i.e. all articles with a "From:" header of "u...@dsrs.nntp.sol.net") are counted together, with a summary of the number of posts, bytes posted, and BI. Only articles that have a BI of 20 or greater are summarized. Please remember that BI is a general formula to measure the number of groups posted to in a manner which favors crossposting. The fact that the posts of a single poster may have a BI of 20 does not imply that the articles are spam, as each article may have been completely different and unrelated. The Al Geiersbach "Duh, I Still Don't Get It" Paragraph: For the completely dense among us, who are unable to grasp the obvious, that means that this isn't a "spam list". It also does not mean that your posts are being cancelled, filtered, or anything else... on the other hand, it doesn't mean that they're not. This service merely counts 'em. (A memorial to a dunce who just refused to "get it" even after it was explained to him in excruciating detail, repeatedly, over the period of about a year. It's still not a spam report, Al, even if you desperately want to think so.) #include <std_disclaimer.h> Automated data gathering mechanisms have collected the data presented in this report. While this information is considered to be relatively reliable, it should be noted that problems do occur and the data gathered and reported might not actually represent an accurate picture of reality. #include <bsd_disclaimer.h> This information is provided by the author "as is" and any express or implied warranties, including, but not limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose are disclaimed. In no event shall the author be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, special, exemplary, or consequential damages (including, but not limited to, procurement of substitute goods or services; loss of use, data, or profits; or business interruption) however caused and on any theory of liability, whether in contract, strict liability, or tort (including negligence or otherwise) arising in any way out of the use of this information, even if advised of the possibility of such damage. And so on, and so forth. Now, here's the music. Top From sorted by BI-sum [. . . .] 324 24.000 24 124426 ERX...@prodigy.com (Marc Reitzes) [. . . .] ========================== QUOTE OFF ============================ --Jim Hargrove Good-bye Dave Reitzes... - Tracy Riddle - 04-10-2013 The last time I looked at alt.conspiracy.jfk it had been completely taken over by a bunch of nasty trolls. Their (lack of) character is on constant display for the world to see when they employ these tactics. |