Deep Politics Forum
The case against the NIST WTC 7 collapse initiation analysis - Printable Version

+- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora)
+-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: 911 (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-6.html)
+--- Thread: The case against the NIST WTC 7 collapse initiation analysis (/thread-11578.html)



The case against the NIST WTC 7 collapse initiation analysis - Tony Szamboti - 03-11-2013

Just thought I would share something going to lawyers in the near future. See the attached.


The case against the NIST WTC 7 collapse initiation analysis - Magda Hassan - 04-11-2013

What lawyers Anthony? What is the story behind that?


The case against the NIST WTC 7 collapse initiation analysis - Tony Szamboti - 04-11-2013

Magda Hassan Wrote:What lawyers Anthony? What is the story behind that?

Magda,

The WTC 7 drawings were released in November 2011 and review of them showed there were serious omissions from the WTC 7 analyses that when included would have made the claims impossible. A number of FOIAs have attempted to get explanations and revision, but have not been fully successful. There was only one erratum issued which corrected the seat width. Stiffeners and beam stubs were also omitted and NIST has admitted the stiffeners were omitted now but say they were since they didn't matter. They certainly did and the evidence is clear. Legal activity seems to be the only way to force the issue and an attempt to get that going is in process.


The case against the NIST WTC 7 collapse initiation analysis - Magda Hassan - 04-11-2013

Okay. Thanks Tony. The usual Freedom From Information going on. Good luck. I hope they are pro bono.


The case against the NIST WTC 7 collapse initiation analysis - Peter Lemkin - 04-11-2013

Tony Szamboti Wrote:
Magda Hassan Wrote:What lawyers Anthony? What is the story behind that?

Magda,

The WTC 7 drawings were released in November 2011 and review of them showed there were serious omissions from the WTC 7 analyses that when included would have made the claims impossible. A number of FOIAs have attempted to get explanations and revision, but have not been fully successful. There was only one erratum issued which corrected the seat width. Stiffeners and beam stubs were also omitted and NIST has admitted the stiffeners were omitted now but say they were since they didn't matter. They certainly did and the evidence is clear. Legal activity seems to be the only way to force the issue and an attempt to get that going is in process.

Great news! Rather ironic that stiffeners could be the 'pea' that makes the 'Princess' finally feel that there is something wrong in the 'bed' they have made!....poor analogy, I know...but whatever gets things moving and stops the madness and the lies!!!

We need our Country back. It was stolen on 9-11-01 under the cover of Big Lies!!!....from stiffeners to our Constitutional Rights and more!


Of course there have been other refusals of information reasonably asked for re: 9-11-01. The list is rather long. Their attitude is 'we are the government', 'just trust us -don't question us' AND 'we really don't have to tell you anything about what REALLY happened on 9-11.'
Ha!:Confusedtampfeet:: Sue the lying treasonous bastards!