Anthrax vaccinations - Printable Version +- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora) +-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: Science and Technology (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-11.html) +--- Thread: Anthrax vaccinations (/thread-1183.html) Pages:
1
2
|
Anthrax vaccinations - Jan Klimkowski - 27-03-2009 I worked with a number of British veterans who claimed to have Gulf War Syndrome. Many of them had been given numerous vaccinations, including anthrax, near simultaneously, and later became stricken with Gulf War Syndrome. Some of these veterans died from the condition - suggesting that it is more severe than Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (with which some doctors seek to compare it). It is not possible to say with certainty what the link between anthrax vaccinations and whatever Gulf War Syndrome may be, actually is. However, there are persistent rumours that some Gulf War I veterans were given an experimental vaccination. Below are two articles which are intiguing. I do not claim that they are necessarily connected. Quote:White House memo exposes Rove knew of problems with anthrax vaccine http://www.zimbio.com/Deputy+Chief+of+Staff+Karl+Rove/articles/104/Anthrax+Gulf+War+Syndrome+Karl+Rove Quote:'Israel treated its soldiers as guinea pigs' http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=12912 Anthrax vaccinations - David Guyatt - 28-03-2009 Jan, Tim Sebastian's novel "Ultra" contains the deep story of Gulf War Syndrome. What he reveals is in the first few and last few pages. It was known as Operation Black Cat and is shocking. Anthrax vaccinations - Magda Hassan - 28-03-2009 Look what I found on the net by some bloke called David Guyatt :wavey: Looks like some one has been using chemical and biological weapons indiscriminately. OPERATION BLACK DOG The Gulf war story no one will publish By David Guyatt ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Source "B" was shaken but not stirred when we first met. The odour of fear and uncertainty was palpable - a fact that was no surprise in view of what I was about to be told. This wasn't my first 007 Bond-like covert rendezvous, but it would certainly be my most startling. We had agreed to meet in order that the source could tell me about a highly secret and even more highly sensitive US operation known as "Black Dog." Neither of us trusted electronic communication and, therefore, a face-to-face meeting was essential. It was a sunny day and our encounter was in a seamy pub somewhere in the countryside of England. I had watched my back the entire journey - just in case. The meeting followed a story I had written on Gulf War Illness, when I had cautiously been told about a top secret US mission known as "Black Cat." This, I was told, involved a "black" US B52 bomber launching from Offut AFB in Nebraksa, and flying a round-trip to the Persian Gulf. The hulking bomber carried one bomb packed with VX nerve agent, the most potent chemical weapon in the US CW armoury. The bomb was dropped on elements of the Republican Guard in Southern Iraq, I was informed. Heavy casualties apparently resulted. The operation, directed by the Central Intelligence Agency, was a counter-strike, following an Iraqi Scud that fell on Israel. The missile had contained Sarin and drove the Israeli government almost apoplectic with rage. Fuming, the Israeli's had readied to detonate a nuclear warhead high above Baghdad. Only the swift intervention of President George Bush forestalled what would have been a cataclysmic move destined to unravel the carefully wrought Arab backed Coalition lined-up against Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein. To avoid any of the nerve agent being blown back towards coalition troops, the mission involved the launch, from Dhahran of a C130 Hercules carrying one, possibly two, massive five ton Fuel Air bombs. These were detonated above ground zero - the location of the VX chemical agent strike - to ensure all traces of the nerve agent were destroyed. Quite possibly, the Fuel Air Device destroyed all evidence of the illegal counter-strike too, by incinerating bodies. Cleansing by fire is as old as warfare itself. This information led me to speak to various sources as I searched for corroboration. I was advised to contact Jim Sebastian, former BBC correspondent and well-known author. During a brief telephone call, Sebastian confirmed he also had the same information as I, as recommended I contact the Countess of Mar - a House of Lords representative with a special interest in Gulf War issues. I met Margaret Mar one evening in late summer 1997. A charming and honest individual, she confirmed she had taken Sebastian's information to the Ministry of Defence in private. They later informed her that following consultation with the US Department of Defense officials, no record of the mission had been found. Clearly this was no denial. Moreover, their explanation didn't gel in other significant ways. The official who responded to the MOD enquiry was Bernard Rostker, the Special Assistant for Gulf War Illness. Hardly, I thought, the person one would expect to be privy to top secret information on a sensitive CIA operation. Besides, I was to later learn that Black Cat almost certainly was subject to a "compartmented" mission name. This simply means that at different levels of the command structure the mission would have been assigned a different name. This nifty device - not dissimilar from Admiral Horatio Nelson holding a telescope to his blind-eye and observing he "sees no ships," - caters nicely to instant deniability, but also helps to identify the level that leaks originate from. Clever. In any event, months later, in December 1997, Tim Sebastian told me that he had fully corroborated Black Cat during a month-long trip to the USA. This was good news but not surprising. In any event, Source B was concerned not with Black Cat - which I learned he knew about in some detail - but a second, far more sensitive mission known as "Black Dog." This mission had occurred around 25 February 1991 and involved Biological weapons, I was told. Specifically the weapon was a bacterium that resulted in those contaminated drowning in their own bodily fluids. Black Dog involved an aircraft launched from a US carrier in the Red Sea that was targeted on an Iraqi CB weapons plant. The bomb was designed to spread its load via an aerosol spray. Source B provided additional information that cannot be revealed for fear of identifying the individual and other sources. My first meeting with Lady Mar was predominantly to discuss this second mission. Both she and Tim Sebastian were aware of a second mission that they both knew as "Black Cat 11," but possessed no details. I was not surprised. Some weeks earlier I had contacted a senior US journalist, asking if he would collaborate on my story. I gave him a brief outline of Black Cat, hoping he may stumble on to Black Dog, too. He did, or at least got details of a mission remarkably similar. Months of investigation resulted in the development of the following mission details: Original source (B) states that Black Dog entailed the launch of a US Navy warplane from a US Carrier on station in the Red Sea. The source remains unable to identify which of two carriers the aircraft launched from (both the USS Saratoga and the USS Kennedy were on station in the Red Sea during this time-frame: 24/25 February 1991). Nor is source able to provide exact date of this mission. The source further stated that aircrew and ground-crew were CIA. The source continued by stating that the aircraft dropped biological warfare munition(s) on an Iraqi chemical/biological weapons factory and that numerous deaths resulted. Source states the munition (s) contained a bacteriological agent with a life of no more than 48 hours. The bacterium was not communicable, and had no given name, only a batch number. Those attacked with this weapon drowned in their own bodily fluids, according to the source, who added that the bio-bomb was parachute deployed and its contents dispersed by aerosol spray. US Sources state that a US Navy S3A Viking aircraft crash landed (presumably as a result of ground fire) behind enemy lines prior to the commencement of the ground war. It is unknown if the aircraft was outward bound on its mission or homebound afterwards. In any event, the spectre of a US "sanitised" aircraft heavily armed with chemical and possibly biological weapons, over-flying hostile territory during time of war logically excludes the possibility this was a training or any other "innocent" mission. The Viking is used in a long-range recconassaince/anti- submarine warfare role. It is thus only lightly armed for defence. In this instance, however, sources say the aircraft was heavily modified with stealth capabilities and was coloured a flat dark grey. The aircraft had no markings, insignia or other identification. Instrumentation was United States manufacture. Bombs were externally attached to wing pylons. The procedure of using unmarked military aircraft (known as "sanitised" i.e., plausible deniability) is known to be consistent with numerous other CIA "black" operations that have reached the public domain. Sources additionally confirm the mission was conducted under the auspices of the Central Intelligence Agency and that the pilot was an Agency employee (presumably a "sheep-dipped" USN pilot). The aircraft carried, we are told, only two bombs due to "weight considerations." The downed aircraft had one remaining bomb attached to external pylons. This munition contained a deadly mixture of Tabun, Sarin and Cyclo-Sarin. However, US sources are unable to identify a target or confirm whether this aircraft launched from a USN carrier - giving rise to understandable caution that this was one and the same mission - although the mission profile is similar. Meanwhile, US sources confirm that the crash site was approximately 60 kilometres behind enemy lines (exact co-ordinates 45.90E - 29.73N) - in a barren wilderness. There the aircraft remained for several days. In the interim, the pilot, who did not eject but came down with his aircraft, was recovered alive. Following the launch of the Ground War (24 February 1991), US and French divisions swept Iraqi forces away from the general area (As Salman), thereby permitting intact recovery of the aircraft. Consequently, a US two man Black Ops "Search Team" were dispatched from Camp Four, in Saudi Arabia (co-ordinates 44.30E-29.00N) to locate the crashed aircraft and provide exact co-ordinates for recovery. Camp Four was a large sprawling complex that housed mostly US forces, but some British elements too. It was a jump off point for the US 101 Airborne (Screaming Eagles) into Iraq on the night of 23/24 February 1991. The complex was extensively used to house and repair a variety of equipment. The two man search team travelled North, into Iraq, by Jeep on or about 27/28 February 1991. Sources state the aircraft crashed approximately one week earlier and that the delay in commencing search and recovery operations was due to the imminent commencement of the ground war. Neither members of the two man search team were US Government employees. In fact, a private US company, almost certainly a CIA proprietary, employed both. Both individuals wore battle-dress but no insignia or other identifying patches - a fact that is again consistent with CIA black operations. An independent British military source has confirmed the presence at Camp Four, of a two man US "Spec Ops" team, in late February 1991. Source stated they were US SpecOps, no insignia or rank apparent and provided a physical description of one individual. Some distance into Iraq, heading due north along the 45.90 East Latitude co-ordinate the search team observed the downed aircraft from a distance, we are told. Inspection via binoculars showed the right wing of the aircraft to be missing. The left wing was intact. Further observation revealed the presence of one remaining bomb located on the external pylon closest to the fuselage. The bomb was coloured a matt black with no visible marking. It was leaking. Both team members donned CB protective equipment, we are informed, and approached. The bomb contained a German manufactured fuse designed to ignite the munition above ground. It was identified as a Mark Eleven Seven munition (MC 117) modified for liquid chemical usage and comprised of a steel body with a Mark 131 fin assembly and Central Bursting Tube - according to information made available. A chemical weapons test with a field test kit (designated "Mary 256") was conducted and revealed the munition to contain a mixture of Tabun, Sarin and Cyclo-Sarin. It must be stressed that a chemical weapon field test kit would not, repeat not, be capable of detecting the presence of any biological weapon whatsoever. Field detection of biological organisms/bacterium is considerably more complex and requires specialist personnel and equipment. This point is stressed for obvious reasons. The presence of a bacterium as outlined by primary source is neither corroborated, nor ruled out, by these discoveries. However, it is significant that prevailing NATO and Soviet doctrine in the use of biological and chemical weapons, called the use of a "mixed load" - that is to say, munitions would typically carry a varied mixture of inter-acting chemical and biological agents/organisms. The search team reported their discovery to base, and was ordered to withdraw immediately. Prior to departing the crash site, both team members were puzzled by the presence of a number of dead Iraqi soldiers. All wore face masks (possibly CB protective gear, but may also have been protection against wind-borne sand) and showed no apparent entry wounds or other manifestations of their fatalities. Both team members were said to be sufficiently perplexed by these bodies to take colour photographs of them, we were informed. These photographs and other details were later forwarded to a United Nations source for investigation. Having left the crash site, the search team were replaced by a US Navy affiliated "Recovery Team." The latter team recovered the aircraft. The bomb was recovered and transported elsewhere. The damaged aircraft was airlifted - presumably by a Jolly Green Giant helicopter - back to Camp Four and temporarily housed in a compound surrounded with barbed wire. Here, a number of individuals managed to photograph the damaged aircraft on site. Copies of these and other supporting data were privately forwarded to the United Nations for investigation. Meanwhile, other military sources confirm the presence of the barbed wire compound at that location. The two man Black Ops (search) team were in the Gulf acting under Army Command. Their mission, and, we are told, that of the latter recovery team, was conducted under the orders of General Fred Franks, commander of V11 Corps - the single largest unit in the Gulf war. Both the "Search" and "Recovery" teams formed part of a Special Unit with the designation "SCRSWA" operated under the direct command of Colonel Johnson (attached to AVSCOM - Aviation System Command, US Army). This unit has not been identified, despite a telephone call to the Pentagon library. A Pentagon employee told this writer, with a nervous laugh, that the unit designation is unknown. According to sources, there was a British involvement. This has yet to be identified and confirmed, but it thought possible the bacteriological weapon may have been of British manufacture. In any event, the remaining munition was placed in the custody of Colonel Johnson, sources say. Both members of the search team were specialists in placing, concealing and camouflaging surveillance devices, we were told. These included placing aircraft laser targeting packages. In November 1997, at my request, the Countess of Mar, in the company of the former Foreign Secretary and Deputy Prime Minister, Lord Howe, met with a senior Ministry of Defence official to discuss Operation Black Dog. The meeting was acrimonious. The result was that the MOD official could neither confirm nor deny the operation but, personally doubted the possibility that a Viking aircraft would be cast in such a role. If this remains the official's only qualitative doubt, I have some advice for him. A phone call to the premier and highly respected publication, Janes Defence Weekly, will be rewarded with an informative discussion about the aircraft's capability and the US Navy's "Gung Ho" attitude when it comes to "black" operations. One of Jane's expert journalists told me - months prior to the MOD meeting - that there is nothing theoretically to stop a Viking from flying a mission as outlined. The journalist went on to describe other missions even more "apparently" unlikely, including the launch of U2 "spy-planes" from US Navy carriers - amongst other facts. It remains to be stated that I was advised - from entirely unrelated sources and, in fact, an entirely unrelated story - that a special CIA team of flyers was stationed at Offut AFB during the Gulf war. One of these, a former Navy pilot, and senior team member, is alleged to have been posted to a US aircraft carrier to assume temporary duty (TDY) as Commander Air Group (CAG) during the same time-frame. For a variety of reasons, I now nurture some suspicions that this later information may have been artfully "planted" as disinformation in order to discredit this story. The identity of the senior team member, employed by the CIA and ONI, is known to me, as is his background, and somewhat adds to my concerns. However, I cannot rule out the possibility that this additional information might have reached my attention innocently and coincidentally and, could be accurate? As our investigation of this story continued, we learned of a possible reason for Black Dog. In later February 1991, an Iraqi Scud had landed in Israel. Sources were able to confirm that the missile contained biological organisms that were "dead on arrival." Whether the organisms were meant to be dead or not wasn't clear, but Iraqi in-expertise in these matters is well-known. This clearly, in the light of the prevailing logic of Black Cat, to be sufficient reason to authorise Black Dog, I believe. The foregoing, it must be said, is powerful evidence that the US may have engaged in at least two chemical and biological warfare missions during the Gulf war. It is not, however, proof positive. Caution is understandably a key-word amongst the journalistic fraternity. At the same time outside and perverse influence to "spike" or otherwise discredit highly sensitive news stories is increasingly a fact- of-life. Those who might doubt that the media could be so easily seduced need only focus their attention on the consequences of the Gary Webb/San Jose Mercury News "Dark Alliance Series," to witness media timidity. Having personally worked on the foregoing story for almost nine months, and witnessed numerous editors, journalists and other media representatives shy-away from it for no good reason, I am inclined to conclude that this is one of those stories destined never to reach the light of day. The hell with that. http://www.ainfos.ca/98/mar/ainfos00310.html Anthrax vaccinations - Jan Klimkowski - 28-03-2009 Deep black cats & dogs, eh? David - we've discussed your excellent research and total frustration over this story before. It is a deep black secret. I have a few random observations. i) There was a French general at the time of Gulf War I who came out and said, (I paraphrase), that the French had no cases of Gulf War Syndrome (GWS). This was significant, and led researchers to believe that GWS may indeed have been caused by battlefield exposure. The reasoning was that only specific parts of the battlefield had been exposed to CBW, and the French forces were primarily deployed in a specific and separate field of action. Of course, the battlefield exposure hypothesis was widely assumed to have been battlefield exposure to Iraqi use of CBW. Your research suggests it may have been allied used of CBW - something that would almost certainly never be officially admitted. However, now, many years on, it appears that the French do have cases of GWS, suggesting battlefield exposure to CBW agents was probably not the sole cause. Quote:Epidemiologist Prof Simon Wessely: Well, the USA have had the same problems that we have. The Canadians have had the same problems, but their CBW prophylaxis was very different. Australia have had the same problems, but much later. The Danes have had the same problems, though they were not actually in the war, but came on peacekeeping and they did not have CBW protection; they did not need it. Finally France, well, up until last week we did not think the French had any problems, but they have just published a report and I speed-read it in French over night and it does look as if they have got some problems after all, which does not surprise me, and it pleases me actually because they have been so smug about it, but it looks like they have had problems as well. They have just literally in the last few days published a report and I have not really had time to look at it. http://209.85.229.132/search?q=cache:2aVb--QQA48J:www.lloyd-gwii.com/admin/ManagedFiles/2/GWI1008%252000.doc+%2Bfrance+%2B%22no+gulf+war+syndrome%22+%2Bgeneral&cd=18&hl=en&ct=clnk ii) why drop biological weapons as well as chemical weapons? Your comments about NATO and Soviet military doctrine being for a "mixed load" of chemical and biological weaponry are fascinating. However, that doctrine makes little sense to me. If you want to wipe out a group of individuals at a location, chemical weapons such as VX and Sarin are pretty effective on their own. This of course was precisely what was allegedly used by the US in Operation Tailwind (see my post 11 in the thread linked below). http://www.deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/showthread.php?p=4118&highlight=tailwind#post4118 There are two further possible reasons for using biological weapons: a) as a field test of a new biological agent. However, one would have expected a proper deep black scientific follow up, with a CBW SWAT team swarming over the site. If the recovery team actually consisted of just two Special Forces soldiers, then the field test hypothesis is unlikely. b) if Saddam had indeed successfully landed a Scud packed with the chemical weapon, Sarin, inside Israel, then the allied forces may have upped the ante by dropping bombs containing both chemical and biological agents on Iraqi forces as a warning. iii) I have problems with the following claim and suspect that - at the scientific level - it's disinformation: Quote:The source continued by stating that the aircraft Specifically, I have a problem with the claim that "the bacteriological agent had a life span of no more than 48 hours". At the biological level, this is fairly unlikely. Unless the bacteria entirely destroy their host, and thus themselves, one would expect them to find a way of surviving in the environment. Chemical weapons are horrific but relatively clean - apart from the risk of blowback onto to one's own forces when the wind changes. Biological weapons are horrific and dirty. The use of biological weapons opens a Pandora's Box of unintended consequences, which could - theoretically - include certain symptoms of Gulf War Syndrome. If the allies did use biological weapons in Gulf War I, it was an incredibly reckless and stupid thing to do. Anthrax vaccinations - David Guyatt - 28-03-2009 Jan Klimkowski Wrote:a) as a field test of a new biological agent. However, one would have expected a proper deep black scientific follow up, with a CBW SWAT team swarming over the site. If the recovery team actually consisted of just two Special Forces soldiers, then the field test hypothesis is unlikely. The two SpecForces guys were tasked specifically to locate the downed aircraft so that it could be recovered. It was. Evidence was not to be left on the battlefield. That was the sum of their involvement. Both gentleman later died of GWS - or exposure to something. iii) I have problems with the following claim and suspect that - at the scientific level - it's disinformation: Quote:The source continued by stating that the aircraft Specifically, I have a problem with the claim that "the bacteriological agent had a life span of no more than 48 hours". At the biological level, this is fairly unlikely. Unless the bacteria entirely destroy their host, and thus themselves, one would expect them to find a way of surviving in the environment. [/QUOTE] Possibly Jan. I am not sufficiently scientifically trained to assess this. However, the source who provided this information proved to be accurate in all other aspects, so far as I could establish - and I spoke to all sorts of people and many military types, SAS and numerous others - including someone who saw the recovered damaged aircraft in a temporary special compound at Camp 4. I also spoke to one of General Schwartkopf's bodyguards who was also very ill and thought he was dying from GWS. In fact over the many months I dedicated to this story I had input from all sorts of people. It was unquestionably a very deep black military operation and highly compartmentalized and incredibly sensitive - which was why no one would publish it - even after one well known editor who repeatedly pleaded with me to give him the story. And when I eventually did, he set off on a Sunday afternoon to meet with a source at the CIA to confirm it. I never heard from him again. This became a rather typical reaction. People got heavily warned off. There was also a GAO investigator all over this story who met with many of the key sources and traveled to the UK for this purpose too. The conclusion I eventually drew was that this gentleman's job was to gather as much information as he could in order to effect an efficient clean up and cover up. I can also add that I was told that the bacteriological agent was developed at Porton Down. I was told that people there were in a real sweat about its use. Fear was palpable. Meanwhile, Tim Sebastian confirmed the essential elements of "Black Cat and knew that there was a second operation (i.e., Black Dog) but wasn't aware of the code-name of that operation and thus referred to it as "Black Cat 2". As you know there is much I didn't publish. After all these years when I look back, I remain absolutely convinced that these operations took place as described. Anthrax vaccinations - Jan Klimkowski - 28-03-2009 David - thanks for that further information. I know you spoke directly with some very senior political figures and some very prominent reporters and editors. All of whom ended up refusing to publish the story - most probably because they were warned off. The fact that individuals involved in the recovery and isolation of the plane dropping the CBW payload became ill with a GWS-type illness, with some of them subsequently dying, suggests that the claim that the biological agent had a 48-hour lifespan was wrong. Indeed, at the scientific level, I really doubt the 48-hour claim. It is precisely because biological agents have the ability to survive and propagate once released into the environment that nations have - at least officially - agreed not to use them. Here's a partial list of known biological weapons: Quote:Diseases considered for weaponization, or known to be weaponized include anthrax , ebola, Marburg virus, plague , cholera , tularemia, brucellosis, Q fever, machupo, Coccidioides mycosis , Glanders, Melioidosis, Shigella, Rocky Mountain spotted fever, typhus , Psittacosis, yellow fever , Japanese B encephalitis , Rift Valley fever, and smallpox [18]. Naturally-occurring toxins that can be used as weapons include ricin, SEB, botulism toxin, saxitoxin, and many mycotoxins. Not a single one of these disease agents has a lifespan limited to 48 hours. So, to clarify, I'm not doubting your story. Quite the opposite - I consider it powerful and compelling. I am doubting the claim made by sources that the biological agent had a 48-hour lifespan because I suspect the lifespan would have been much longer, and the agent far more persistent. It is precisely this longer and entirely unpredictable and uncontrollable lifespan that makes use of biological weapons so truly insane. Anthrax vaccinations - David Guyatt - 28-03-2009 Quite possible Jan. The point I was making is that the source knew a fair amount about chemical and bio weapons but wasn't an expert of the quality expected from senior employees of Porton Down. He may have been purposely misinformed. But for reasons I do not wish to go into in public I would not have expected this, although it is possible. Who knows? The novel Ultra (Black Cat) speaks of an HIV type thingy. I can't now remember if this was an experimental HIV cure/medication or the actual virus itself (I do still have a copy of the novel, but it is not easily accessible and the thought of getting into the loft to check it does not inspire me with a sudden flush of energy). So it possible that the killer of the two SpecForces guys and Schwarzkopf's bodyguard (if indeed he did eventually succumb?) might have been from that source and not the recovery of the aircraft in question. In other words Black Cat may have been the cause and Black Dog a whole different ball game? Anthrax vaccinations - Jan Klimkowski - 28-03-2009 David Guyatt Wrote:The novel Ultra (Black Cat) speaks of an HIV type thingy. I can't now remember if this was an experimental HIV cure/medication or the actual virus itself (I do still have a copy of the novel, but it is not easily accessible and the thought of getting into the loft to check it does not inspire me with a sudden flush of energy). This takes us into the territory explored by a world class scientist, Dr Garth Nicolson, who believes mycoplasmas are responsible for Gulf War Syndrome. Some of his peer-reviewed work is available here: http://www.gulfwarvets.com/mycoplas.htm In written testimony, Nicolson has stated about Gulf War Illnesses (his phrase for Gulf War Syndrome): Quote:Potential Sources of Exposures That Could Have Caused GWI http://www.gulfwarvets.com/testimony.htm Continued in next post. Anthrax vaccinations - Jan Klimkowski - 28-03-2009 Dr Garth Nicolson's credentials: Quote:Professor Garth L. Nicolson is the President, Chief Scientific Officer and Research Professor at the Institute for Molecular Medicine in Huntington Beach, California (http://www.immed.org). Born in 1943 in Los Angeles, Dr. Nicolson received his B.S. in Chemistry from University of California at Los Angeles in 1965 and his Ph.D. in Biochemistry and Cell Biology from the University of California at San Diego in 1970. He is currently Professor of Integrative Medicine at Capitol University of Integrative Medicine and a Conjoint Professor at the University of Newcastle (Australia). He was formally the David Bruton Jr. Chair in Cancer Research and Professor and Chairman of the Department of Tumor Biology at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, and he was Professor of Internal Medicine and Professor of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine at the University of Texas Medical School at Houston. He was also Professor of Comparative Pathology at Texas A & M University. Professor Nicolson has published over 580 medical and scientific papers (including 3 Current Contents Citation Classics), edited 14 books, served on the Editorial Boards of 30 medical and scientific journals. Professor Nicolson has won many awards, such as the Burroughs Wellcome Medal of the Royal Society of Medicine (United Kingdom), Stephen Paget Award of the Metastasis Research Society, the U. S. National Cancer Institute Outstanding Investigator Award, and the Innovative Medicine Award of Canada. He is also a Colonel (Honorary) of the U. S. Army Special Forces and a U. S. Navy SEAL (Honorary) for his work on Armed Forces and veterans’ illnesses. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garth_Nicolson Note that both US Special Forces and US Navy SEALS have honoured Dr Nicolson for his work on veterans' illnesses. Now note the following: Quote:Project Day Lily By Garth L. Nicolson, Ph.D and Nancy L. Nicolson, Ph.D. The Institute for Molecular Medicine http://www.immed.org http://www.policestateplanning.com/project_day_lily.htm Anthrax vaccinations - Jan Klimkowski - 28-03-2009 Below is a link to research on Dr Garth Nicolson's Institute website: http://www.immed.org/illness/gulfwar_illness_research.html |