When Computerization Really Starts to Kill Jobs......[not such a pretty picture of the future.] - Printable Version +- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora) +-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/Forum-Deep-Politics-Forum) +--- Forum: War on Workers and Labor Unions and Students (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/Forum-War-on-Workers-and-Labor-Unions-and-Students) +--- Thread: When Computerization Really Starts to Kill Jobs......[not such a pretty picture of the future.] (/Thread-When-Computerization-Really-Starts-to-Kill-Jobs-not-such-a-pretty-picture-of-the-future) |
When Computerization Really Starts to Kill Jobs......[not such a pretty picture of the future.] - Peter Lemkin - 23-12-2013 As the digital revolution kills jobs, social unrest will rise [and this is what the conservatives are predicting...even without wars & police states, environmental destruction, many of the living may soon envy the dead]10 strategic predictions for the next 10 yearsBy Patrick ThibodeauOctober 7, 2013 05:26 PM ET Computerworld - ORLANDO - Gartner is forecasting some major changes in technology, especially in areas like 3D printing, machine learning and voice recognition. They are all powerful trends that will reduce the need for workers, and, as a consequence, bring social unrest, the analyst firm said. In the industrial revolution -- and revolutions since -- there was an invigoration of jobs. For instance, assembly lines for cars led to a vast infrastructure that could support mass production giving rise to everything from car dealers to road building and utility expansion into new suburban areas. But the digital revolution is not following the same path, said Daryl Plummer, a Gartner analyst at the research firm's Symposium ITxpo here. "What we're seeing is a decline in the overall number of people required to do a job," he said. Plummer points to a company like Kodak, which once employed 130,000, versus Instagram's 13. Gartner sees social unrest movements, similar to Occupy Wall Street, emerging again by 2014. "Occupy-type Wall Street movements are going to grow," he said during his presentation of the "Top 10 Strategic Predictions." Plummer looked at trends in time frames over the next 10 years. One attendee who agreed with the prediction that digitization and automation will cost jobs was Tom Seitzberg, director of international IT operations for Genomic Health in San Francisco. "Ultimately, every society lives from the backbone from a strong middle class," said Seitzberg. "If you get just a top level, a small amount of very rich people and a very large piece of very poor people, it leads to social unrest." Seitzberg said it's important to see "how you can also make sure that the people are actually benefiting from it." Here are the remaining predictions from Gartner:
When Computerization Really Starts to Kill Jobs......[not such a pretty picture of the future.] - Magda Hassan - 23-12-2013 It is an interesting phenonema. Clearly there are not going to be enough jobs to go around. And because jobs have been traditionally linked ot income there will not be enough money to go around. Some things got to give. However, as we see, work is not the only source of income so perhaps it is better to look at 'money' who gets it an why as opposed to the technology. Though much technological invention has been to eliminate jobs to maximise profit for the 'owners' of capital it is also true that many jobs are dangerous, repetitive and boring so to have a machine to do them is not all bad. In an enlightened and engaged society the reduction of these dangerous or boring jobs would be welcomed as a liberating thing and a social improvement. How ever that is not our society right now and I see things getting much worse before they get better. A universal wage is a possible start for change. When Computerization Really Starts to Kill Jobs......[not such a pretty picture of the future.] - Lauren Johnson - 23-12-2013 Magda Hassan Wrote:It is an interesting phenonema. Clearly there are not going to be enough jobs to go around. And because jobs have been traditionally linked ot income there will not be enough money to go around. Some things got to give. However, as we see, work is not the only source of income so perhaps it is better to look at 'money' who gets it an why as opposed to the technology. Though much technological invention has been to eliminate jobs to maximise profit for the 'owners' of capital it is also true that many jobs are dangerous, repetitive and boring so to have a machine to do them is not all bad. In an enlightened and engaged society the reduction of these dangerous or boring jobs would be welcomed as a liberating thing and a social improvement. How ever that is not our society right now and I see things getting much worse before they get better. A universal wage is a possible start for change. Another way to look at it: in a world in which there will be 'too many useless mouths,' there well have to be a final solution to that problem. Why waste that wonderful technology on those who are ultimately takers and always will be? Sadly, this is the direction the world is heading. |