+- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora)
+-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: Propaganda (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-12.html)
+--- Thread: CNN Does MLK (/thread-12043.html)
CNN Does MLK - Albert Doyle - 20-01-2014
CNN did a show on the Martin Luther King assassination last night. They did the same pattern approach as they did with the Kennedy assassination on the 50th anniversary. They pretended to expose the conspiracy evidence but then answered it each and every time with official story arguments and evidence that proved Ray did it. CNN was clearly touting the government position.
A couple of things. At one point in the program they showed that FBI was going after King with a defamation attack. So where was the narrative asking why FBI was going after a world famous American civil rights leader and national hero and what exactly that makes FBI? King was a good guy, right? So those who underhandedly attack him with dirty programs are bad guys, right? Also, where was the pointing out that under the COINTELPRO era being such a target and having such a controversial death was not a unique thing or that King's mysterious death was identical to many other such FBI COINTELPRO targets? After all, what are the odds of King suffering an unrelated death under such circumstances?
Another thing is Ray showed intel smarts in his acquisition of a Canadian passport while on the run. That's a pure give away that CNN never bothers to discuss. Nor did CNN discuss the gun drop framing Ray similar to Oswald, except to parrot the government version.
I mean we know JFK was killed by a CIA conspiracy and had an identical propaganda program done on him by CNN on the 50th. So what are they telling us by doing an identical such program on King on his holiday?
While mentioning the Memphis trial in 1999 CNN never mentioned that it didn't bother to attend that trial or explain why on their hit piece.
CNN Does MLK - Tracy Riddle - 26-01-2014
I was thinking about watching this and then decided I'd heard it all before. My stomach isn't strong enough for it anymore.
The problem with the deaths of JFK, RFK, MLK and others is that they've moved into the realm of myth and propaganda, and too many people across the political spectrum accept the official story because it's politically useful. Or the truth is NOT politically useful for them to examine.
For liberals who believe in "good government," or conservatives who believe in "American exceptionalism," how does the truth about these assassinations do anything but destroy their delusions and fantasies?