Quote:Hidden plan for ministers to axe laws that protect you with a penstroke

[URL="http://mikesivier.wordpress.com/2014/02/02/hidden-plan-for-ministers-to-axe-laws-that-protect-you-with-a-penstroke/"]

02SundayFeb 2014

[/URL]
Gone in a penstroke: If the Deregulation Bill becomes law, Acts of Parliament that protect your freedom could be removed from the statute book at a minister's whim.

I have spent much of today putting old paperwork through the shredder in advance of tomorrow's debate on the Deregulation Bill.
Why? Hidden among the plans to revoke ancient laws regulating pigsties is a clause that revokes the freedom of the press in particular, the freedom of journalists to protect their sources.
The Conservatives and Liberal Democrats don't want reporters to be able to protect political whistleblowers and the information they release from state harassment and confiscation.
Vox Political has long warned that the Coalition government was pushing us towards totalitarianism, and that is exactly what this apparently innocuous but in fact deeply pernicious piece of legislation proves.
We've had the gagging law, to silence organised dissent; we know that police chiefs want to use water cannons to stifle public protest; now we are faced with a cloak-and-dagger scheme to silence the press.
The removal of these privileges means the media will be unable to report anything that does not meet government approval or face confiscation of equipment including computers, notebooks, recordings and correspondence that will lead to the identification of people who provide information that the government wants hushed up.
As a blogger who is also a qualified journalist, this directly affects me and that is why I have been destroying paperwork. Tomorrow is only the Bill's second reading it must go through the committee stage, report stage and third reading before moving on to the House of Lords but it is better to be well-prepared than to be caught napping.
Far more insidious than this, however, is the other part of this red tape-cutting' Bill that goes unmentioned. The really harmful part…
The part that says ministers should have the power to revoke any law they like, using statutory instruments (at the stroke of a pen) rather than taking the issue to a democratic vote in Parliament and, you know, actually telling anybody about it.
This means freedoms we have enjoyed for centuries- or just a few years could be removed with no prior notice, under the pretext of getting rid of red tape'.
We would certainly be living in a police state if this were allowed to happen.
So here's the big question: Do you think your MP even knows about this?
I only know because I read it on Another Angry Voice - from which site this article has swiped much of its information.
In his article, AAV creator Thomas G. Clark points out: "The Tories that devised this scheme… are clearly relying on the vast majority of Coalition MPs voting this through as the whips instruct them, without bothering to even read the documentation, understand the intricacies or even participate in the debate.
"If you chose to ignore the wealth of evidence and refuse to believe that David Cameron and the Tories would use these new powers to… stamp out dissent for their own sociopathic reasons, then at least consider the possibility that they are enabling the possibility of an unimaginably invasive totalitarian regime in the future. One where open justice is abolished, the population permanently monitored for signs of dissent, and dissenters are silenced in secretive Stalinist style legalistic proceedings."
Obviously AAV and Vox Political will be right in the firing-line if this happens.
You need to contact your MP and ask what they're going to do about this appalling assault on your freedom. Tell them about the clauses in the Deregulation Bill that have nothing to do with removing archaic regulations and everything to do with clamping down on your freedom and tell them in no uncertain terms that you won't have it.
It's a good bet that they won't know what you're talking about. Clause 47 relates to the press, as this Guardian report and this article from Inforrm's blogmake clear.
I believe Clause 51, and those following, relate to the repeal of laws by statutory instrument.
You can find contact details for your MP on TheyWorkForYou.com
If you get an email off to them quickly, there might even be a chance to nip this in the bud.

Peter Lemkin Wrote:Sounds like a spin-off of the American 'Presidential signing statements' started under, in which a President can secretly sign a statement as to which parts of a bill coming from Congress the Executive Branch will obey and respect as 'law', and which parts not. Which parts are in which category often are forever [as far as I know] kept secret - a very few are made know - but they never touch on 'national security' matters.