Deep Politics Forum
US Army crowd control doctrine advocates assassinating protest leaders with snipers - Printable Version

+- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora)
+-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: War on Workers and Labor Unions and Students (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-30.html)
+--- Thread: US Army crowd control doctrine advocates assassinating protest leaders with snipers (/thread-12988.html)



US Army crowd control doctrine advocates assassinating protest leaders with snipers - Magda Hassan - 25-08-2014

US Army crowd control doctrine [active as of April 2014] advocates assassinating protest leaders with snipers

[URL="http://fas.org/irp/doddir/army/fm3-19-15.pdf"]http://fas.org/irp/doddir/army/fm3-19-15.pdf

[/URL]
LETHAL OVERWATCH TEAMS
6-28.
During a NL engagement, the use of a DM team provides confidence
and safety to those facing the mob. If
a lethal threat is presented, the DM
team in an overwatch position (armed with a standard infantry rifle that is
mounted with a high-powered scope) ca
n scan the crowd, identify agitators
and riot leaders for apprehens
ion, or fire lethal fire if so ordered or warranted.
It is also ideally suited for flank and countersniper operations


US Army crowd control doctrine advocates assassinating protest leaders with snipers - Drew Phipps - 25-08-2014

Why does the US Army even have a crowd control doctrine?


US Army crowd control doctrine advocates assassinating protest leaders with snipers - Magda Hassan - 25-08-2014

Yes. The military should have no jurisdiction over domestic policing matters.


US Army crowd control doctrine advocates assassinating protest leaders with snipers - Lauren Johnson - 25-08-2014

Quote:Why does the US Army even have a crowd control doctrine?


NORTHCOM plus Full Spectrum Dominance equals doing whatever it takes.


US Army crowd control doctrine advocates assassinating protest leaders with snipers - Albert Doyle - 25-08-2014

The US government is acting like a guilty organization that no longer respects its population. Could it be because they have an agenda other than democracy?