+- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora)
+-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: 911 (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-6.html)
+--- Thread: It's easy, anyone could do it (/thread-13813.html)
It's easy, anyone could do it - Tracy Riddle - 18-03-2015
I'm struck by the absurd similarity of arguments by defenders of the official stories of JFK and 9/11. Particularly with regard to the piss-poor pilots of 9/11. Hani Hanjour, who allegedly flew Flight 77 into the Pentagon, performed a high-speed maneuver that professional military/civilian jet pilots regard as virtually impossible.
Yet, apologists will insist that all of the flying that day was easy - they had spent time on simulators! Hanjour wasn't allowed to fly solo in a Cessna, but an airliner at 500 mph was EASY! And the shooting in Dealey Plaza was simple - ANYONE could do it! :
:
It's easy, anyone could do it - Carsten Wiethoff - 18-03-2015
Not only is it very difficult or impossible to fly a 757 in that way, it is also completely useless, risky and unnecessary. It would have been much easier to fly in a direct line into the upper floors of the inner ring than to clip an antenna and several lightpoles, flying low to the ground with high speed, risking premature destruction of the aircraft. You would also have had a better chance to hit Rumsfeld or other important brass. But maybe that was not the purpose.
Analysis of the flight recorder that was found in the Pentagon reveals some other strange behaviour, like that BOTH of the pilots in a time interval of a few seconds adjusted the altimeter to the correct barometric pressure, like professional pilots would do, when passing FL180. For people intending to crash into a building with near perfect visibility this is not a logical thing to do. There are also things that any AA pilot would have done before departure, which were NOT done in AA77, like the alignment of the inertial reference platform.
One possible explanation would be that the flight data recorder found in the Pentagon did not belong to AA77, but to a flight executed by professional military pilots, flying a military aircraft equipped with GPS. How it ended up in the Pentagon is the million dollar question.
It's easy, anyone could do it - Magda Hassan - 18-03-2015
That is what is confusing for me too. Why the big circle around the building? Why not just fly directly at it? It would have served the same purpose and been far easier for an inexperienced pilot. It makes no sense. Too many 'coincidences' that day.
It's easy, anyone could do it - Tracy Riddle - 19-03-2015
Magda Hassan Wrote:That is what is confusing for me too. Why the big circle around the building? Why not just fly directly at it? It would have served the same purpose and been far easier for an inexperienced pilot. It makes no sense. Too many 'coincidences' that day.
Obviously it was intended for one particular part of the Pentagon to be struck (recently reinforced, few personnel inside, minimal damage done). This is one of the things that proves the "made it happen" theory, rather than the "let it happen" theory.
It's easy, anyone could do it - R.K. Locke - 19-03-2015
This sums it up quite nicely I think:
[video]https://youtu.be/yuC_4mGTs98?t=46s[/video]
It's easy, anyone could do it - Magda Hassan - 19-03-2015
Tracy Riddle Wrote:Agree 100% with that.Magda Hassan Wrote:That is what is confusing for me too. Why the big circle around the building? Why not just fly directly at it? It would have served the same purpose and been far easier for an inexperienced pilot. It makes no sense. Too many 'coincidences' that day.
Obviously it was intended for one particular part of the Pentagon to be struck (recently reinforced, few personnel inside, minimal damage done). This is one of the things that proves the "made it happen" theory, rather than the "let it happen" theory.
It's easy, anyone could do it - Drew Phipps - 19-03-2015
Not intending to pick a fight here, but it would be a lot easier, especially with a cumbersome big plane, to make a relatively leisurely 315 degree turn while losing altitude that it would be to make a sharp turn and shed enough altitude to strike the Pentagon. Of course, that still begs the question why the plane, if being hijacked by rank amateurs, bothered to turn at all, instead of just boring straight in from the northwest.
It's easy, anyone could do it - David Guyatt - 20-03-2015
R.K. Locke Wrote:This sums it up quite nicely I think:
[video]https://youtu.be/yuC_4mGTs98?t=46s[/video]
I enjoyed that.
It's easy, anyone could do it - Dawn Meredith - 20-03-2015
David Guyatt Wrote:R.K. Locke Wrote:This sums it up quite nicely I think:
[video]https://youtu.be/yuC_4mGTs98?t=46s[/video]
I enjoyed that.
Perfect for those with little attention span. I just posted it on my fb page.