+- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora)
+-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: 911 (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-6.html)
+--- Thread: Man Who Stared at Goats Now Stares at the Truth (/thread-13861.html)
Man Who Stared at Goats Now Stares at the Truth - David Guyatt - 03-04-2015
This is hardly news, but it was news to me -- an old man speaks out. And a big thumbs up to him for doing so.
Thanks to Dawn for this...
Man Who Stared at Goats Now Stares at the Truth - Tracy Riddle - 07-04-2015
Stubblebine's been a critic of the 9/11 story for a long time. There are a surprising number of retired military & intelligence people who are too.
Man Who Stared at Goats Now Stares at the Truth - Dawn Meredith - 09-04-2015
Tracy Riddle Wrote:Stubblebine's been a critic of the 9/11 story for a long time. There are a surprising number of retired military & intelligence people who are too.
Good to know. What we really need are some demolition experts to weigh in. The one guy who did- the Dutch guy- has since "died" (murdered?)
Dawn
Man Who Stared at Goats Now Stares at the Truth - Charles Keeble - 09-04-2015
I've seen one video about Stubblebine that made him out to be a total nut. I have the "Men Who Stare at Goats" book, but haven't read it. Not sure I need to.
Man Who Stared at Goats Now Stares at the Truth - R.K. Locke - 09-04-2015
Charles Keeble Wrote:I've seen one video about Stubblebine that made him out to be a total nut. I have the "Men Who Stare at Goats" book, but haven't read it. Not sure I need to.
I got the same impression watching this interview:
Man Who Stared at Goats Now Stares at the Truth - David Guyatt - 10-04-2015
Destroying and/or shredding the credibility of an important critic is standard operating procedure. For me it means his criticism hurts those who are responsible.
Man Who Stared at Goats Now Stares at the Truth - Magda Hassan - 10-04-2015
David Guyatt Wrote:Destroying and/or shredding the credibility of an important critic is standard operating procedure. For me it means his criticism hurts those who are responsible.
Agree. He is not to be ignored.
Also can definitely recommend the book 'The Men Who Stare At Goats'. It is written by Jon Ronson an English journalist and documentary film maker. The movie based on his book with George Clooney is a pretty good flick too.
Man Who Stared at Goats Now Stares at the Truth - Michael Barwell - 10-04-2015
David Guyatt Wrote:Destroying and/or shredding the credibility of an important critic is standard operating procedure. For me it means his criticism hurts those who are responsible.
Just so; they did it (or tried to) with Lady Di even. They want me to be off my rocker - 'course, I would say that, but the number of refs to mental issues I get is very high & frequent, especially lately, but I'm pissing them off. Louis Theroux: By Reason of Insanity tv prog is interesting (airing atm on BBC, 2x part I think); fella with schizo-affective bi-polar (I know someone with this) says he can/could communicate with anyone across the globe; Netanyahu told him to speed in his car, which he did, and got locked-up. That comm thing may well be true. I tend to think the mental issues community are playthings for those who regard themselves as 'gods' & 'zuperdooperheroes', from conversations with my pal it all sounds quite familiar, 'cept a recognition that everything they say is b/s is a good tonic. I have a bit of an issue with the local mental health services in Darlington; I trotted along for a chat as I was at the time feeling a bit crook, just down, but I wanted thenm to tell me I was fine, which they did, and nowI apparently de facto have a 'history of mental health issues', which is insanely klepto of them. Two letters and a few 'phone calls to the head honcho of that farticular hacienda, and I've not got the written explanation I asked for of their ways - even after having quoted FoI - Mr. Scriven. It's a dirty business - very 'Soviet', as I know it by growing-up during the times when this sort of thing is what distinguished the good guys from the bad. There's a top notch mental health proffessional, a woman, who's saying this synthetic crap should be taken into account in diagnoses - I don't fancy her chances much, tho' she has some advantage.
Have just stumbled on this - http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/ciencia_matrix57d.htm - with a sufficiently large pinch of salt, it's pretty accurate, especially the 'Mind Probe' bit (I loathe these terms... 'Psychotronic'?... ugh.. They throw so much shit at a person, and have formerly manipulated them so, that it can't fail to register a 'hit'. It's just a game for obsessive sado-narcissists).