1. con·trived[SUP]1[/SUP]
   [kənˈtrīvd]
   [B]ADJECTIVE
   
   [/B]
   • deliberately created rather than arising naturally or spontaneously.
     *definition courtesy of Oxford Dictionaries
     
   
   Did Sgt. Gerald Hill lie about the wrongfully accused having a gun stuffed into his belt at the Texas Theatre?
   When we look at Commission Exhibits 156 and 157, both of these pants are void of belt loops…
   
   
   *Image courtesy of top shelf researcher Gil Jesus
   
   so, did Sgt. Gerald Hill outright lie about a belt securing a weapon? -- have a listen between 3:173:25 > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8-m7-W5pJ0&list=PLo6KBC4k-l-5cxYxeP2TheiU-RW6ZKjQ5&index=42
   
   They lied about the total number of shots; they lied about a bullet exiting the president's throat; they lied about the rifles; they lied about the phantom bus & cab rides; they quickly concealed away from public consumption a second bullet found at Parkland medical (the one Governor Connally himself--while positioned a full floor above where the other bullet discovery was made down on the 1[SUP]st[/SUP] floor--actually saw and heard hit the floor in his 2[SUP]nd[/SUP] floor emergency room before one of his attending nurses picked it up); they lied about the Mexico City trips, even using multiple imposters to incriminate the wrongfully accused; they lied about the autopsy findings; What didn't they lie about? and, now, just when you thought their lying eyes couldn't lie any more, here comes Sgt. Gerald my lips are moving" Hill…
   
   Given that at some point between his arrest at the Texas Theatre, where he's wearing gray pants, and his subsequent placement in a holding room at police headquarters the gray pants were exchanged for something much darker…
   
   
   *thetimes.tribune.com
   
   We are left to wonder--in the absence of no longer wearing his much lighter gray pants he was actually arrested in if someone planted incriminating evidence in them to match the shell casings/events at 10[SUP]th[/SUP] & Patton?
   
   Talk about musical pants, but enough of that already, just be wary of anything Gerald Hill swears by (thank goodness for the exemplary research compiled by the top shelf researcher at the above link's landing page). The gist of this post, before I got sidetracked by the musical pants caper, was simply to share a peculiar item I came across while reading last night. We all know the wrongfully accused was abroad in "defection" mode between October, 1959June, 1962, right? So, when I read within his personal effects, upon his arrest, there was a pay stub dated mid August, 1960, I immediately thought that's impossible he couldn't have been abroad and working a job stateside at the same time. So, I rubbed my eyes and looked at the document again (it was late, perhaps my eyes was playing tricks on me, or so I thought). Here, go ahead, have a look for yourself --à
   
   http://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth340292/m1/1/
   
   So, either this is an oversight by the conspirators in this case, or, something far more sinister… planted (there's that word again Sgt Gerald 'my lips are moving" Hill)...as in planted "evidence" to suggest the wrongfully accused was in the employ of Castro's Cuba, or the KGB, or even something else equally incriminating to link him either to a person or place to further incriminate him with even more bogus "evidence". Why else would he have a pay stub dated three years hence in his possession while he was abroad so far away during that particular pay period stateside?
   
   Bunch of lying treasonous cowards (just like cowards to shoot an unarmed man and then pin the blame on an innocent party)
   

Drew Phipps Wrote:The paycheck was not in Oswald's name, someone named "Jackson" IIRC. But it is still mysterious.

Drew Phipps Wrote:Yes. But that seems to be a theme.

Quote:The paycheck was not in Oswald's name, someone named "Jackson" IIRC. But it is still mysterious.