Kevin Ryan: Dulles 9/11 Video Probably Faked - Printable Version +- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora) +-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: 911 (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-6.html) +--- Thread: Kevin Ryan: Dulles 9/11 Video Probably Faked (/thread-14782.html) |
Kevin Ryan: Dulles 9/11 Video Probably Faked - Lauren Johnson - 01-06-2016 [URL="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2016/05/insiders-look-dulles-911-video.html"]May 30, 2016 [/URL] Another devastating piece of evidence shooting down the official story if true: Quote:The strongest evidence linking the alleged hijackers to 9/11 was a video said to be from the closed circuit TV (CCTV) system at Dulles International Airport in Washington DC. The video was not made available until the day before the 9/11 Commission Report was released, in 2004, and it helped to pave the way for widespread acceptance of the official account. Since the other evidence against the accused hijackers was dubious and suspiciously convenient for the FBI, which provided it, the Dulles video should be examined closely.Doing so has led some independent 9/11 investigators to conclude that the Dulles video contains "no information to link its images to AA 77." Reasons include that: Kevin Ryan: Dulles 9/11 Video Probably Faked - Peter Lemkin - 01-06-2016 Think about it. Many [many!] of the alleged hijackers have been proven to still be alive. All the videos of them that supposedly show them about to board the alleged flights seem to be strange or tampered with or invented. They were not listed on the passenger lists nor as among the dead. None of their body parts nor DNA were ever found, yet their passports and headbands etc. were (likely planted fake-'evidence'). Just like with the Pentagon 'CCTV video' of what hit it, though there were hundreds of cameras, we are told only one camera at three locations caught anything and it was not released until long long after the event - and all are suspect in many ways. Further, what we do know of the men named as the alleged hijackers doesn't comport with their 'legends', instead they were intelligence and military-connected and many lived lives of sex, drugs and such - hardly that of jihadis. Nothing of the official version of 9-11-01 is believable except the date it happened on. The rest is a fairy tale formulated for endless war and turning the USA into a police-state...which is what we now have. Kevin Ryan: Dulles 9/11 Video Probably Faked - Tracy Riddle - 03-06-2016 Has anyone ever been able to confirm that the Boston and New Jersey airports had no security cameras in 2001? Someone who used those airports frequently, for example. I just find it impossible to believe that such huge, modern airports didn't have security cams at the time. Kevin Ryan: Dulles 9/11 Video Probably Faked - Peter Lemkin - 03-06-2016 Tracy Riddle Wrote:Has anyone ever been able to confirm that the Boston and New Jersey airports had no security cameras in 2001? Someone who used those airports frequently, for example. I just find it impossible to believe that such huge, modern airports didn't have security cams at the time. All airports had security cameras in 2001!...even little tiny ones...let alone big ones. Kevin Ryan: Dulles 9/11 Video Probably Faked - Tracy Riddle - 03-06-2016 Peter Lemkin Wrote:Tracy Riddle Wrote:Has anyone ever been able to confirm that the Boston and New Jersey airports had no security cameras in 2001? Someone who used those airports frequently, for example. I just find it impossible to believe that such huge, modern airports didn't have security cams at the time. That's what I thought, but I can't prove that those two did. Kevin Ryan: Dulles 9/11 Video Probably Faked - Dean Bernard - 10-06-2016 Having been in the electronic security industry for over 30 years and in security integration sales with large national companies for the last 16 years, I will relate my knowledge of the systems in place at the time, based on what I knew at the time. I had just transitioned from installation subcontractor for Pinkerton Systems Integration to Sales for Pinkerton at the time of the 911 event. I had installed several Loronix video systems for Pinkerton in the late 1990's as a subcontractor. At that time, Loronix was one of two companies with "State of the Art" networkable video, still using analog cameras, as IP cameras were not yet readily available commercially. I think, not 100%, both companies are/were Canadian. I know Loronix was. Verint purchased Loronix somewhere around 2003. The Loronix product, which I sold to a major Military training facility, was absolutely designed to record the time and date on each camera. I suspect it was possible to make a copy of this without the time date stamp for the reason given, but, this would be highly unlikely. First, the average video operator would not have known, or wanted to, unless asked to do so, how to do this as it was against all normal procedures and logic. After all, this is the proof of when and where. If two or more cameras were installed at the gate, you could get simultaneous video from two angles for the same event. But, pre 911, I doubt most airports had more than this at any one gate for cost reasons. The real issue is, most all major airports have many cameras, even back then. Why are there no videos of these guys entering the terminal? Perimeter entrance is a primary objective of video surveillance at ANY facility. These videos HAD to exist. Why only show the gate videos. If they had that, they have to have more. BTW, Verint today remains a leader in high end video surveillance recording and cameras and is installed at major airports around the world using IP cameras and state of the art behavior detection algorithms very effectively. In fact, Airport surveillance is one of their specialties today. Kevin Ryan: Dulles 9/11 Video Probably Faked - Dean Bernard - 10-06-2016 In 2001, almost no video surveillance systems recorded at 30 frames per second. Primarily because most systems then we're using time-lapse VHS tape recorders and were incapable of these frame rates. If your system was capable of theses frame rates, you could not afford the storage costs to retain the video more than a day or so. These recorders were most often using recently invented video multiplexers to feed the video from multiple cameras into one VHS machine. Back then, if you had a system capable, you would be changing tapes 4 or 5 times a day to keep up with those frame rates. No one did that except some Federal prisons and gambling casinos where high frame rates really mattered. The Boston airport could not have recorded all of their cameras on a Loronix system at 30 frames a second unless they paid millions for the video system, a rarity pre 911. Kevin Ryan: Dulles 9/11 Video Probably Faked - Tracy Riddle - 10-06-2016 Thanks for the info, Dean. Yes, I recall gas stations and convenience stores having security cameras back in 2001, so it would be astonishing if any major airport didn't. We should have lots of verified footage of all 19 hijackers that day. Kevin Ryan: Dulles 9/11 Video Probably Faked - Peter Lemkin - 10-06-2016 Tracy Riddle Wrote:Thanks for the info, Dean. Yes, I recall gas stations and convenience stores having security cameras back in 2001, so it would be astonishing if any major airport didn't. We should have lots of verified footage of all 19 hijackers that day. It is not JUST a lack of images - none of the airport personnel remember seeing any of them; no body parts or DNA of any of them, despite offers by many of the families for DNA samples. Many of them still known to be alive and they are not even listed on the list of persons killed that day, amazingly. Non-persons who by the official evidence we not even there. As to the 'lack' of video evidence, it was not just at the airports, but around the Pentagon. The FBI within minutes started seizing all governmental and private videos from all around the building and area - never to be seen again except for the handful of see-nothing definite freeze frames - some with date-stamp of the next day [9/12/01]. The official version is a joke - a very BAD joke now destroying Amerika and the World ::fury:: |