+- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora)
+-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: Historical Events (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-8.html)
+--- Thread: New evidence implicates Jack Anderson in Watergate (/thread-15185.html)
New evidence implicates Jack Anderson in Watergate - Anthony Thorne - 07-12-2016
From Glomar Disclosure (which was aggressively hacked this past week) - long, detailed, with new evidence from FOIA. Danny Casolaro makes a guest appearance.
https://glomardisclosure.com/2016/12/07/evidence-implicates-jack-anderson-watergate/
New evidence implicates Jack Anderson in Watergate - Lauren Johnson - 08-12-2016
Ed Kaiser's name appears four times in this post. Here is the first:
Quote:One statement came from Ed Kaiser. The FBI was quick to dismiss his statement due to his troubled past, although it would be corroborated by another individual. According to Kaiser, he had spent a considerable amount of time with Frank Sturgis in 1972 due to their longstanding friendship. It was during this time that Sturgis asked him if he would be interested in helping instigate a riot at the Republican National Convention as part of a plan to make anti-war protestors look bad. [/FONT]
New evidence implicates Jack Anderson in Watergate - Mark A. O'Blazney - 08-12-2016
Anthony Thorne Wrote:From Glomar Disclosure (which was aggressively hacked this past week) - long, detailed, with new evidence from FOIA. Danny Casolaro makes a guest appearance.
https://glomardisclosure.com/2016/12/07/evidence-implicates-jack-anderson-watergate/
Some wild stuff here.
That link to the PROBE from '73 was a blast from the past. (Law of Duress….. LOL !)
I'm sure we'll be hearing from Scott any time now.
New evidence implicates Jack Anderson in Watergate - Anthony Thorne - 09-12-2016
Mark A. O'Blazney Wrote:I'm sure we'll be hearing from Scott any time now.
Probably, but Scott's apparently having words with the author of the above article in the meantime. In fairness to Scott, I gather he disowns the Trine Day edition of his book.
https://twitter.com/NatSecGeek/status/807204128795475968
https://twitter.com/NatSecGeek/status/807206508832366592
https://twitter.com/NatSecGeek/status/807208320977223680
New evidence implicates Jack Anderson in Watergate - Magda Hassan - 09-12-2016
Yes he does Anthony.
All those tweets were deleted. What where they about?