+- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora)
+-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: JFK Assassination (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-3.html)
+--- Thread: Stancak Posts False Prayer Man Evidence On Education Forum (/thread-16357.html)
Stancak Posts False Prayer Man Evidence On Education Forum - Brian Doyle - 07-10-2023
Stancak wrote:
"Pauline Sanders was where she told the FBI she was: in the east part of the doorway, close to the glass window. She cannot be seen in Altgens6 because her figure is masked by the figure of a man wearing dark suit and tie. Sanders can be seen in one frame of Darnell (shown in my video). I have made the height estimate using 3D modelling, and she indeed was tiny - 4'11''. This height estimate was verified by an independent method using a group photograph, discovered by Linda Zambanini. In that group photograph, Sanders's tip of the nose is about 2 inches below the avererage height of the level of tips of noses of all ladies. As the average body height of ladies of Sanders's age in was 5'2'' in 1963, her body estimate comes to about 5', close to my estimate of 4'11'. Sanders wore a specific dark hat both in the group photograph and in Darnell frame which also helps in her identification. "
My Response:
Stancak has yet to admit to himself that he found Pauline Sanders as the Tiny Face between Lovelady & Shelley in Altgens 6...This identification is correct and it helps prove that Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton...So therefore we do not need to keep repeating the same false evidence for years like Stancak is doing here...Because the Education Forum is run by a criminal incompetent and fool, James Gordon, the simple fact that Stancak has identified Sanders as Tiny Face has not been confirmed...Stancak is too biased towards proving Oswald to be Prayer Man...Because that bias affects his judgment he refuses to process that Altgens' telephoto lens makes Sanders appear closer than she is and Tiny Face is in that position to the east of the front door that Stancak posts...Stancak refuses to admit that he has found Sanders and she is Tiny Face...And once you find Sanders the rest of the Prayer Man evidence automatically makes Prayer Man Stanton...
The second mistake Stancak makes is he says Sanders is seen in Darnell...Alan Ford showed all the Darnell frames in motion on Duncan's nut forum...Even though Ford himself is a nut like MacRae (and probably is MacRae posting under an alias), he did credibly show that what is being called Sanders in Darnell is actually a photo glitch that only appears in one frame...Stancak should check it out but that won't happen because that asshole Gordon has made the JFK internet a place of non-cooperation and dysfunction...A good example of Stancak's notorious pseudo-analysis is seen in his technical examination of what now turns out to be a glitch in Darnell he is calling Sanders...He doesn't need to examine that glitch...Stancak has already found Sanders in Tiny Face...
Stancak wrote:
"Sarah Stanton's location was on the top landing, and to the left of Wesley Frazier. He confirmed her location at least twice in interviews, also linked in my video. She was a huge lady, and she needed a large platform to stand on, not only an area of one step. She was tall (but she did not wear any 3-inch heels - verified by me in an email exchange with a family member) and had dense, light coloured hair. Unfortunately, as she stood at the back of the top landing and behind some other people, an area covered by shadow, none of the photographs shows enough of her figure. However, it is possible to infer on her presence from a light-coloured spot at the height of 5'7'' above the level of the top landing. Such a light-coloured blob can be seen both in Darnell and Wiegman, and some patches of her hair can also be seen in one version of Algens6 which shows enough details (shown in my video)."
My Response:
Stancak isn't honest because he is on record on the Education Forum saying that if Prayer Man was standing on the top landing platform that Prayer Man would be too short to be Oswald...Now, in 2023, we have Stancak entering that Stanton was a large woman who needed the space of the top platform to stand on...This is how goofy Stancak and the Education Forum are because Stancak is hanging himself by his own words but no one is honest enough to call him on it...This is the stupidity that they are passing off as the current JFK research community...
To further this crazy-ness Stancak then enters that the 5 foot 4 Stanton was "tall"...We know Stanton wasn't tall because we can see her next to Frazier as Prayer Man and she only comes up to Frazier's chin...We can also see she isn't tall in Owens...Stancak makes no effort to use his pseudo-analysis to compare Stanton's height in Owens to that of Prayer Man because he knows what he'll find...And no one asks him too either - which is incredibly dishonest and is the type of "research" Gordon prefers...Remember, Gordon bans for life for failing to follow correct evidence procedure when told...When Davidson matched Stanton in Owens to Prayer Man's height Gordon and Stancak ignored it...
Stancak is also dishonestly ignoring that both Lovelady & Frazier placed Stanton in the Prayer Man spot at the time of the Prayer Man photography...Lovelady said Stanton was next to him to the right of Frazier when the limousine passed and Frazier said he was standing and staring at Stanton after Calvery told them the president was shot...It is a pure act of intentional dishonesty for Stancak to ignore that Couch/Darnell is the exact moment Frazier was describing and he is clearly facing Prayer Man who pivoted towards him to tell him what Calvery had said...Stancak and Gordon contemptuously ignore that pivot - that is proof beyond any doubt, for the level of researcher they pretend to be, that Stanton is Prayer Man...
Stancak is trying to get away with placing Stanton back in the shadows to the left of Frazier while ignoring Davidson that clearly showed Stanton's face on Prayer Man as well as a woman's Scoop Dress Neckline...
This is all overseen by the moderator criminal Gordon...
RE: Stancak Posts False Prayer Man Evidence On Education Forum - Alan Ford - 02-10-2024
Thank goodness for the astute and exemplary research of credible researchers like Mr. Stancak, who are motivated simply by getting to the Truth.
Mr. Stancak is one researcher who doesn't jump to false conclusions or play musical-chairs with the evidence to fit a self-serving narrative. Godspeed, Mr. Stancak, cheers!
RE: Stancak Posts False Prayer Man Evidence On Education Forum - Brian Doyle - 05-10-2024
This forum has dropped its previous standards and now allows crazy trolls from MacRae's nut forum to troll good research...
Alan Ford is a troll...You can read his posts on The Education Forum calling out Stancak for ignoring the recently discovered woman's dress neckline on Prayer Man, which effectively proves Prayer Man is Stanton...Now, when the opportunity to troll arises, Ford abuses this forum with the full approval of the DPF moderatorship in order to cause disruption...On The Education Forum Ford mocks Stancak for ignoring my proof and now the DPF moderators allow Ford to support Stancak over here for disruptive purposes...This forum has come a long way down...
Stancak is an evidence-ignoring hack who tried to hide Stanton behind the man to the left of Frazier in Darnell...The recent 1st generation 6th Floor Museum copy of Darnell was sharp enough to show Stanton wasn't there...Stancak's reaction to being busted fabricating evidence was to self-reference a tone of authority and say "you are on your own"... Stancak has the confidence to try to get away with that because of the criminality of James Gordon and incompetent lack of Peer Review in the JFK research clique...
RE: Stancak Posts False Prayer Man Evidence On Education Forum - Alan Ford - 15-10-2024
On the contrary, Mr. Doyle, this forum has been and always will be an open space for civil exchanges relevant to the getting to the truth of the matter concerning an unarmed duly elected representative of the People ambushed, and subsequently assassinated by multiple parties still to be determined, despite the hastily contrived script mired in the stench of horse manure to frame an innocent party. The wrongly-accused did not shoot anybody. Anybody.
IF you cared to differentiate facts from fiction--as if--You could easily ascertain that the Alan Ford you are referencing isn't me. IF you gave Mr. Gordon (James) the respect he deserves, he and his moderator-staff would easily verify to you that I haven't signed into *my Education Forum account for several years now. Moreover, IF you cared to ascertain facts from fiction you could make the same inquiry over at Mr. MacRae's forum and come away with the same results. Yes, admittedly, there is a new poster bearing the name of "Alan Ford" who happened upon the JFK Assassination research scene four years after I initially did (14 May 2014).
A year later, less than satisfied with Mr. MacRae's forum's propensity to accept "the lone gunman" fairytale, I respectfully bid that forum adieu, and as my profile confirms here I became a member in July 2015. Then 3 1/2 years later, someone I highly respect in the JFK Assassination Community asked me was I posting over on Mr. MacRae's forum again? His question piqued my interest so I attempted to become a member over there again, but to my surprise another Alan Ford forced me to add my middle initial to rejoin that forum. Again, IF you cared to treat the forum owners and moderator staff with the respect they deserve, they would have brought to light that I only sign-in from New York; and. moreover, interestingly enough they could also have shared with you that "Alan Ford" and my newly adopted profile name Alan J. Ford were signed in over at Mr. MacRae's site on various occasion at the same time at different intervals and locations. Facts matter, Mr. Doyle, rely upon them rather than mere fiction.
The one thing I am grateful for here at this forum is that the ownership and moderating staff do care to reserve and preserve the actual profiles of its longstanding membership. Rest assured, Mr. Doyle, I haven't signed into the Education Forum for several years now, and at that time it was to read an informative post about the Texas School Book Depository's Roof (its access, etc). You would save yourself a lot of confusion IF you simply cared to separate facts from your fiction sir.
On another note, with all due respect to you and others who may have been potentially in harms way--given the recent back-to-back hurricanes barreling through Florida, I do hope & pray that you are safe and those you care about are as well.
Lest you forget, I applaud Mr. Stancak's exemplary research. Facts matter, Mr. Doyle, stop confusing yourself sir with fiction.