WHICH PATH TO PERSIA? Options for a New American Strategy toward Iran - Printable Version +- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora) +-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: Geopolitical Hotspots (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-20.html) +--- Thread: WHICH PATH TO PERSIA? Options for a New American Strategy toward Iran (/thread-1718.html) |
WHICH PATH TO PERSIA? Options for a New American Strategy toward Iran - Magda Hassan - 30-06-2009 http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/rc/papers/2009/06_iran_strategy/06_iran_strategy.pdf WHICH PATH TO PERSIA? Options for a New American Strategy toward Iran Kenneth M. Pollack Daniel L. Byman Martin Indyk Suzanne Maloney Michael E. O’Hanlon Bruce Riedel Table of Contents Introduction The Trouble with Tehran: U.S. Policy Options toward Iran . . . . . . . . . . . 1. Part I Dissuading Tehran: The Diplomatic Options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Chapter 1: An Offer Iran Shouldn’t Refuse: Persuasion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Chapter 2: Tempting Tehran: The Engagement Option . . . . . . 42 Part II Disarming Tehran: The Military Options . . . . . . . . 61 Chapter 3: Going All the Way: Invasion . . . . . 63 Chapter 4: The Osiraq Option: Airstrikes . . 74 Chapter 5: Leave it to Bibi: Allowing or Encouraging an Israeli Military Strike . . . . 89 Part II Toppling Tehran: Regime Change . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101 Chapter 6: The Velvet Revolution: Supporting a Popular Uprising . . . . . . 103 Chapter 7: Inspiring an Insurgency: Supporting Iranian Minority And Opposition Groups . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .113 Chapter 8: The Coup: Supporting a Military Move Against the Regime . . . . . . 122 Part IV Deterring Tehran: Containment . . . . . . 129 Chapter 9: Accepting the Unacceptable: Containment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131 Conclusion Crafting an Integrated Iran Policy: Connecting the Options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145 WHICH PATH TO PERSIA? Options for a New American Strategy toward Iran - Peter Presland - 30-06-2009 I've only skimmed the document so far so this may be a little unfair (ie it does offer some 'dovish' options too) but the most striking thing about it is its language and sheer arrogance. Written as the options available to the Hegemon to make certain its hegemony is maintained. This from Part II: Quote: .... As noted above, in the section on the time frame for an invasion, whether the United States decides to invade Iran with or without a provocation is a critical consideration. With provocation, the international diplomatic and domestic political requirements of an invasion would be mitigated, and the more outrageous the Iranian provocation (and the less that the United States is seen to be goading Iran), the more these challenges would be diminished. In the absence of a sufficiently horrific provocation, meeting these requirements would be daunting.It really is scary, deja-vu stuff. Pretty much exactly as we have come to expect so no real surprises. WHICH PATH TO PERSIA? Options for a New American Strategy toward Iran - Magda Hassan - 30-06-2009 Yes, Peter. Very recycled PNAC isn't it? Or AIPAC. Just like they've erased Iraq and put in Iran. Breathtaking in its arrogance. 'Why do they hate us?" they ask. You don't have to be in Mensa to answer that. WHICH PATH TO PERSIA? Options for a New American Strategy toward Iran - David Guyatt - 30-06-2009 Things for train spotters (and war spotters) to look out for: Page 66 Quote: A marine amphibious force. Funny that because I recently read a report on this forum stating that two US Marine amphibious task forces are in the region as we speak. Probably coincidence. WHICH PATH TO PERSIA? Options for a New American Strategy toward Iran - Magda Hassan - 01-07-2009 'US forces attempt to hijack Iranian oil field' Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:05:09 GMT American forces have attempted to take over an Iranian oil field near the country's western border with Iraq, a security official says. “US forces backed by tanks entered the Mousian area of the Dehloran County, laying around 100 meters of pipeline in Iranian territory," the source, talking on condition of anonymity, said Monday. The source added that the pipes, marked with Iraqi flags, were blocked after Iranian forces pushed the “intruders” back across the border. Iraqi officials have been notified of Iran's objection to American movements along the common border, according to the source. http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=99363§ionid=351020101 WHICH PATH TO PERSIA? Options for a New American Strategy toward Iran - Jan Klimkowski - 01-07-2009 Magda Hassan Wrote:American forces have attempted to take over an Iranian oil field near the country's western border with Iraq, a security official says. The false flag MO is familiar. It's been used by everyone from Hitler to George Bush. (Both of them.) However, the Yanquis would be seriously deluded to start a war against Iran, even with Netanyahu-led Israel sending in the bombers in Round One. Richard Armitage allegedly threatened to blast Pakistan "back to the Stone Age" after 9/11. I'm sure Israel and the neocons would try to turn the threat into reality in the case of Iran. They'd still lose, though. |