![]() |
|
Blair to be called for British Iraq inquiry - Printable Version +- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora) +-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: Lounge (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-19.html) +--- Thread: Blair to be called for British Iraq inquiry (/thread-1903.html) |
Blair to be called for British Iraq inquiry - Magda Hassan - 02-08-2009 :rofl: BLAIR TO BE CALLED FOR BRITISH IRAQ INQUIRY Independent, UK - Tony Blair will be called to give evidence to the Iraq war inquiry, its chairman confirmed today. Sir John Chilcot warned that his team would "not shy away from making criticism" if they uncovered mistakes. Launching the long-awaited inquiry, Sir John said the former prime minister, who sent British forces into the conflict alongside the US, would be among witnesses called. He repeated his insistence that, "wherever possible", evidence would be heard in public, perhaps live on television, but some sessions would remain behind closed doors, "consistent with the need to protect national security, sometimes to ensure complete candor and openness from witnesses". http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/blair-to-be-called-to-iraq-war-inquiry-1764775.html Blair to be called for British Iraq inquiry - Charles Drago - 03-08-2009 Remind me why we shouldn't expect a Warren/9-11/Diana-style whitewash from all this. Blair to be called for British Iraq inquiry - Peter Lemkin - 04-08-2009 Charles Drago Wrote:Remind me why we shouldn't expect a Warren/9-11/Diana-style whitewash from all this. ...sorry, I can't think of why we shouldn't...in fact we almost certainly should - its a 'done deal' cover-up from the get-go. :burnout: Blair to be called for British Iraq inquiry - Jan Klimkowski - 04-08-2009 Quote:Iraq inquiry 'should be held in public' http://www.channel4.com/news/articles/uk/iraq%20inquiry%20should%20be%20held%20in%20public/3218732 :bandit: There ya have it. The purpose of the whitewash is to "purge mistrust" about the government's motives for invading Iraq. And in the highly unlikely event that Tony Blair is found to have been mistaken or to have manipulated public opinion, there won't be any recriminations or prosecutions. Just Truth and Reconciliation. I've now wasted a minute of my life contemplating this charade.... Blair to be called for British Iraq inquiry - Peter Lemkin - 04-08-2009 I guess they can start writing the Public version of the Report even before they hold any private hearings....as the results are foregone conclusions :marchmellow: Blair to be called for British Iraq inquiry - Peter Presland - 06-08-2009 Charles Drago Wrote:Remind me why we shouldn't expect a Warren/9-11/Diana-style whitewash from all this.Here are a whole boatload of reasons why that's EXACTLY what we SHOULD expect. Trowbridge Ford is prolific with his 'Deep-State shenanigans' output. Over the past year or two I've been somewhat bemused by much of it. For sure the guy knows his way around UK Police/Security State issues though, even if some of his speculations - often presented as fact - are at face value bizarre. I guess I should qualify that with the observation that there is a sort of tongue-in-cheek uber-provocative quality to some of it - maybe intended to provoke some sort of SIS response - or whatever. Anyway, his latest piece on the Chilcot Inquiry is a good read. It is a grand tour of Sir John Chilcot's involvement in covering Establishment backsides on such apparently diverse matters as: multiple blowbacks for dirty tricks against the IRA, the murder of Olaf Palme, the Stalker Inquiry, the murder of Daniel Morgan, corruption in Met Police high places; the death of Greater Manchester Chief Constable Mike Todd plus assorted other embarrassments and all of them apparently connected by more than just Sir John's laundryman activity. [URL="http://cryptome.org/0001/chilcot-inquiry.htm"]The piece is a bit long to post here but his parting shot is: [/URL] "With a track record like this, anyone who expects any surprises from the Chilcot Inquiry will be sadly disappointed." That, IMHO, hits the nail squarely on the head. Blair to be called for British Iraq inquiry - Magda Hassan - 25-06-2012 Ah, decisions...which liar do we believe? Quote:http://www.morningstaronline.co.uk/index.php/news/content/view/full/120626 Blair to be called for British Iraq inquiry - Magda Hassan - 25-06-2012 Related articlesSuggested Topics MPs demanded an emergency recall of the Chilcot inquiry last night after new revelations that Tony Blair blocked the Government's most senior lawyer from explaining to Cabinet the legality of the war in Iraq. According to the newly published full version of Alastair Campbell's diaries, the Attorney General Lord Goldsmith wanted to "put the reality" to cabinet ministers that there was a case against, as well as for, military action in March 2003. But, according to his former spin doctor, the then Prime Minister feared that the legal opinion was too "nuanced" and would allow the war's ministerial critics Robin Cook and Clare Short to say that the case had not been made. The disclosure is significant because, while it has long been suspected that Mr Blair and his inner circle put pressure on Lord Goldsmith to change his legal advice, this is the first evidence that the PM actively blocked the Cabinet from hearing the full details of the case for war. MPs from all parties urged Sir John Chilcot, who has finished taking evidence and is now preparing his report into the Iraq war, to reconvene a special session to hear from Mr Blair, Mr Campbell and Lord Goldsmith. The former Liberal Democrat leader Sir Menzies Campbell said: "According to the diaries, Tony Blair was determined that the decision should not rest with the Cabinet and overruled his Attorney General. Sofa government prevailed at the expense of constitutional requirements. The diaries prove that once a decision to go to war against Iraq had been taken, intelligence and legal advice was manipulated to support that decision." Lord Goldsmith presented a longer legal opinion to Mr Blair on 7 March 2003 in which he said he believed there was a "reasonable case" in favour of military action, but that "there was also a case to be made the other way". According to Mr Campbell's diaries, Lord Goldsmith warned Mr Blair that he did not want the Prime Minister to "present it too positively" in favour of military action because there was a "case to be made the other way". Mr Campbell wrote: "TB also made it clear he did not particularly want Goldsmith to launch a detailed discussion at Cabinet, though it would have to happen at some time, and ministers would want to cross-examine. With the mood as it was, and with Robin [Cook] and Clare [Short] operating as they were, he knew if there was any nuance at all, they would be straight out saying the advice was that it was not legal, the AG was casting doubt on the legal basis for war. Peter Goldsmith was clear that though a lot depended on what happened, he was casting doubt in some circumstances and if Cabinet had to approve the policy of going to war, he had to be able to put the reality to them." But Mr Campbell added that this was blocked by Mr Blair and his gatekeeper, Sally Morgan, during a meeting of Mr Blair and his closest aides on 11 March: "Sally said it was for TB to speak to Cabinet, and act on the AG's advice. He would simply say the advice said there was a reasonable case." Following the 11 March meeting, Lord Goldsmith produced a new, one-page legal opinion which put the "reasonable case" for war which was discussed at Cabinet and used in Parliament to justify military action. In his own memoir, A Journey, Mr Blair did not reveal details of how he tried to block Lord Goldsmith. He said only that the Attorney General had "set out the arguments for and against and on balance came out in favour". When he gave evidence to the Chilcot inquiry in January 2010, Lord Goldsmith was asked by inquiry panel member Sir Roderic Lyne whether anyone asked him to "restrict what you said to Cabinet to the fairly limited terms in which you presented this to Cabinet". Lord Goldsmith replied: "No." Sir Menzies added: "There seems to be a substantial difference between the contents of the diaries and the evidence given to the Chilcot inquiry, and the inquiry would be well advised to reconvene itself." Last night Clare Short said she was not surprised that Mr Blair had been "deceitful" in presenting the case for war. Peter Kilfoyle, a minister in the Blair government, also called for the Chilcot inquiry to be recalled. "There is a straightforward contradiction between the two positions and it needs to be corroborated." The Conservative MP Patrick Mercer said: "New facts have come to light and this makes me question whether we know enough about the then Prime Minister's attitude that justified the war." Mr Campbell said last night: "Peter Goldsmith's legal opinion is in the public domain and it was no secret he had concerns at various points. This is entirely consistent with what he and Tony Blair said to the Chilcot inquiry." Blair's road to war 29 July 2002 Lord Goldsmith writes to Blair that regime change in Iraq is "not a legal basis for military action". 24 Sept 2002 "Dodgy dossier" in which Blair claims it is "beyond doubt" that Saddam has WMD. 22 Oct 2002 In submission to Chilcot, Lord Goldsmith says "my advice was not sought" after this date. January 2003 Blair tells MPs there were some circumstances where a second UN resolution "not necessary". 30 Jan 2003 Goldsmith warns Blair lawfulness of invasion debatable with-out UN Security Council determination. February 2003 Goldsmith advises the "safest legal course" was to gain fresh UN approval. 17 Mar 2003 Lord Goldsmith publishes advice declaring military action "legal", giving "green light for military action". 21 Jan 2011 Blair tells Chilcot inquiry he "did not understand how Lord Goldsmith could reach the conclusion that a further [UN] decision was required" in January 2003. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/blair-blocked-cabinet-from-hearing-legal-advice-on-iraq-7878737.html Blair to be called for British Iraq inquiry - Jan Klimkowski - 25-06-2012 Quote:Mr Campbell said last night: "Peter Goldsmith's legal opinion is in the public domain and it was no secret he had concerns at various points. This is entirely consistent with what he and Tony Blair said to the Chilcot inquiry." Fuck Campbell. Still spinning like a top. Still getting paid. Still full of shit. |