![]() |
|
Could this ‘police officer’ be a soldier? - Printable Version +- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora) +-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: Black Operations (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-9.html) +--- Thread: Could this ‘police officer’ be a soldier? (/thread-247.html) |
Could this ‘police officer’ be a soldier? - David Guyatt - 08-10-2008 I remember seeing this picture of the CO19 policeman on a H & K discussion forum at the time. Forum members were speculating that the weapon was not CO 19 but SAS. Naturally, not a glimmer of the picture now exists online. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article550024.ece Could this ‘police officer’ be a soldier? Michael Smith BRITISH special forces soldiers took part in the operation that led to the shoot-to-kill death of an innocent Brazilian electrician with no connection to the London bombings, defence sources said last week. Jean Charles de Menezes was tailed by a surveillance team on July 22 as he caught a bus to Stockwell Underground station in south London. He was shot eight times when he fled from his pursuers at the Tube station. The Ministry of Defence admitted last week that the army provided “technical assistance” to the surveillance operation but insisted the soldiers concerned were “not directly involved” in the shooting. Press photographs of members of the armed response team taken in the immediate aftermath of the killing show at least one man carrying a special forces weapon that is not issued to SO19, the Metropolitan police firearms unit. The man, wearing civilian clothes with a blue cap marked “Police”, was carrying a specially modified Heckler & Koch G3K rifle with a shortened barrel and a butt from a PSG-1 sniper rifle fitted to it — a combination used by the SAS. Another man, dressed in a T-shirt, jeans and trainers, was carrying a Heckler & Koch G36C. Although this weapon is used on occasion by SO19 it appears to be fitted with a target illuminator purchased as an “urgent operational requirement” for UK special forces involved in the war on terror. The soldiers who took part in the surveillance operation that led to de Menezes’s death included men from a secret undercover unit formed for operations in Northern Ireland, defence sources said. Known then as 14 Int or the Det, it is reported to have formed the basis of the Special Reconnaissance Regiment, the newly created special forces unit stationed alongside the SAS at Hereford. The men include SAS soldiers serving on attachment and are part of a team of around 50 UK special forces that has operated in London since the July 7 bombings in which 56 people died. Special forces counterterrorist experts have been regularly used to support police at Heathrow since the September 11 attacks. They moved into London a day after the July 7 bombings and have been supporting the police and gathering intelligence to help snare the suspects. Members of SO19 (technically known as CO19) are trained by SAS and SBS instructors. One key tenet of that training is to ensure that a suicide bomber is killed rather than wounded, which would allow them to trigger a bomb. The use of multiple shots to the head is the modus operandi of the special forces, whether from the SAS, the SBS or the undercover intelligence operators used in the Stockwell operation. Over the past 30 years the SAS has developed a reputation for never allowing gunmen to remain alive, an attitude shown most graphically during the 1980 Iranian hostages siege and the Gibraltar IRA killings eight years later. “It is vital to strike fear into the minds of the terrorists,” one former SAS officer said. “In an ongoing situation such as we have now the fear must be directed to the fact that we are watching them and will eventually (get) them. They need to know that they cannot escape. “We know they are happy to kill themselves but that doesn’t mean they are happy to be killed by others. As long as they evade the police they will think they are in control but the minute they are intercepted they lose control.” The Ministry of Defence insisted last week that the military involvement was limited in the operation that led to de Menezes’s death. “We would describe it as technical assistance as part of a police-led operation under police control,” a spokeswoman said. “It is a particular military capability that the police can draw on if needed. It was a low-level involvement in support of a police-controlled operation.” The Det is made up of the army’s best urban surveillance operators using skills honed in Belfast against republican and loyalist terrorists. Its speciality has always been close target reconnaissance: undercover work among civilians, observing terrorists at close quarters, and carrying out covert searches of offices and houses for information and weapons. The unit was very egalitarian when it operated in Northern Ireland. An operator’s rank was always regarded as less important than his or her capabilities; it was also the only UK special forces unit to use women. The Det broke into homes to gather intelligence and plant listening devices or hidden cameras. Weapons were left where they were found but “jarked” with tiny transmitters placed inside them that would provide warning should they be moved. Could this ‘police officer’ be a soldier? - David Guyatt - 08-10-2008 I was struck at the time that the number of bullets pumped into Charles De Menezes was intended as an example to deter others, and I see no reason whatsoever to change my mind about this. De Menzes was killed as an example. Everything that has followed is typical political blame-storming to deflect this unpalatable truth from the public mind. http://www.guardian.co.uk/global/2008/oct/01/uksecurity.london De Menezes inquest: Army put on standby after London attacks Met created 'fly teams' to respond to attacks in other cities Jenny Percival and agencies guardian.co.uk, Wednesday October 01 2008 13:13 BST Article history Army units were put on standby across Britain following the failed London terror attacks on July 21 2005, jurors heard today at the Jean Charles de Menezes inquest. Counter-terrorism officers at Scotland Yard put soldiers on alert for attacks on cities such as Birmingham or Manchester as they launched the hunt for those behind the London attacks. Details of the extent of the security operation emerged during the eighth day of the inquest into the death of De Menezes, who was shot dead the day after the failed bombings. Police firearms officers killed the 27-year-old at Stockwell tube station after he was mistaken for on-the-run terrorist Hussain Osman. Detective Superintendent Jon Boutcher said he was responsible for identifying those behind both the failed July 21 attacks and those on July 7, in which 56 people died including four suicide bombers. Giving evidence at the Oval cricket ground in south London, where the inquest is being held, Boutcher said a series of meetings were held late on July 21. The inquest heard senior officers were made aware of a number of similarities between the July 7 and July 21 attacks. Boutcher said: "My assessment was London was going through a unique period and we were trying to make contingencies to prevent further attacks elsewhere. "So I did seek to put measures, police measures, in place for firearms capabilities outside London, including military assets." Boutcher said two-man "fly teams" were created so Met police specialists could be sent quickly to any location in Britain. He said the officers could travel to other cities, for example Birmingham or Manchester, if there were attacks. Boutcher said their role would be to use their experiences of July 7 to improve coordination of the police response. "There was an ability to put people around the country very quickly," he said. Boutcher, a former Flying Squad detective, said he had arranged for an armed surveillance team and officers from the Met's CO19 specialist firearms unit to be put on standby. He said the hunt for the failed suicide bombers was an unprecedented challenge. "Was it going to be the case that they had simply fled or were they - which was my main concern - reorganising somewhere to come back and attack London? "I was especially conscious of what we had learned from July 7 and that a bomb factory existed that had sufficient materials, component parts and mixture to make additional devices." Boutcher said a training exercise took place on July 15 to test the suitability of operations room 1600 at New Scotland Yard. The inquest heard officers found the extra people and communications created a "chaotic" environment with noisy radio communications. |