+- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora)
+-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: JFK Assassination (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-3.html)
+--- Thread: Oswald autopsy photographic fakery? (/thread-3755.html)
Oswald autopsy photographic fakery? - James H. Fetzer - 14-05-2010
Those who are following the Judyth Vary Baker thread on either forum
are no doubt aware of the controversies that have arisen about these
photographs. I am posting them here absent commentary, except to
observe that Judyth has described the man she knew in New Orleans
as having "impressive equipment" and that he did not shave his public
area. I am looking for yet another black-and-white, which was taken
from above his left foot and shows his penis lying across his left hip.
For more on the background to these issues, see the Judyth thread.
![[Image: sxp44w.jpg]](http://i44.tinypic.com/sxp44w.jpg)
![[Image: 8y9ide.jpg]](http://i44.tinypic.com/8y9ide.jpg)
![[Image: 2usv5zq.jpg]](http://i44.tinypic.com/2usv5zq.jpg)
![[Image: 14vcjd.jpg]](http://i44.tinypic.com/14vcjd.jpg)
![[Image: vry4w1.jpg]](http://i44.tinypic.com/vry4w1.jpg)
Oswald autopsy photographic fakery? - Jack White - 14-05-2010
Jim...Dr. Rose's autopsy reports the pubic hair shaved.
The photos show the same.
That Judyth Baker disputes this does not necessarily show
photographic fakery. There are many options to explain
this oddity, including that Judyth did not know...especially
since she is quoted as having said conflicting things about his
"private parts."
Jack
Oswald autopsy photographic fakery? - Dean Hagerman - 14-05-2010
I have studied the pictures very closly and I agree with Jim that either the color photo is faked or was switched
Jim I really hope you can find the picture you are talking about
I think this study is imporatant as if this photo was faked/switched it goes to prove yet another alteration in the JFK case
Just compare the color photo with the black and white photos, it is very easy to tell of the difference in size, also consider how much closer the color photo is taken of LHOs privates, the color photo should show an even larger member
Instead we see an avarage or below avarage size compared to the large size we see in the B&W photos
Jim says that his photo shows an even larger member
I hope Jim can find this photo as it will help to prove that point
The ED forum shut down this research because the Mods thought the photos were offensive
I do not agree that the photos are offensive at all, we are all adults and if we research this with respect with no jokes or slang made about LHOs privates I dont see a problem
If this photo is faked or switched then it is a huge discovery
Oswald autopsy photographic fakery? - James H. Fetzer - 14-05-2010
Well, Jack, you are not the authority on Oswald's private
parts, while Judyth may well be. I have asked you for a
comparison between the color image and the black-and-
white. For some reason, instead of doing that, you are
prevaricating. I don't like that. Spare us that she may
or may not have said "conflicting things", since I have
already dealt with the circumcised/uncircumcised issue
and am unaware of any others. The shaving could have
taken place after his death but before these photographs
were taken. Use a little imagination. Dean seems to me
to be right: the black-and-white testicles are larger and
the color member is smaller, plus the legs are not as far
apart in the color as in the back-and-white. Why don't
you do one of your patented comparisons and let us see
for ourselves how they match. I have asked you to do
that before. I don't understand all this hesitation unless
you are apprehensive that the outcome will undermine
your adamant opposition to everything Judyth tells us.
Jack White Wrote:Jim...Dr. Rose's autopsy reports the pubic hair shaved.
The photos show the same.
That Judyth Baker disputes this does not necessarily show
photographic fakery. There are many options to explain
this oddity, including that Judyth did not know...especially
since she is quoted as having said conflicting things about his
"private parts."
Jack
Oswald autopsy photographic fakery? - Duncan MacRae - 14-05-2010
There's no fakery, Jim.
![[Image: Oswald_Comparison.png]](http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i286/niteprowler147/Oswald_Comparison.png)
Oswald autopsy photographic fakery? - Anthony Marsh - 15-05-2010
Jack White Wrote:Jim...Dr. Rose's autopsy reports the pubic hair shaved.
The photos show the same.
That Judyth Baker disputes this does not necessarily show
photographic fakery. There are many options to explain
this oddity, including that Judyth did not know...especially
since she is quoted as having said conflicting things about his
"private parts."
Jack
The Dallas police shaved Oswald's public hair for evidence.
Oswald autopsy photographic fakery? - Anthony Marsh - 15-05-2010
James H. Fetzer Wrote:Well, Jack, you are not the authority on Oswald's private
parts, while Judyth may well be. I have asked you for a
comparison between the color image and the black-and-
white. For some reason, instead of doing that, you are
prevaricating. I don't like that. Spare us that she may
or may not have said "conflicting things", since I have
already dealt with the circumcised/uncircumcised issue
and am unaware of any others. The shaving could have
taken place after his death but before these photographs
were taken. Use a little imagination. Dean seems to me
to be right: the black-and-white testicles are larger and
the color member is smaller, plus the legs are not as far
apart in the color as in the back-and-white. Why don't
you do one of your patented comparisons and let us see
for ourselves how they match. I have asked you to do
that before. I don't understand all this hesitation unless
you are apprehensive that the outcome will undermine
your adamant opposition to everything Judyth tells us.
Jack White Wrote:Jim...Dr. Rose's autopsy reports the pubic hair shaved.
The photos show the same.
That Judyth Baker disputes this does not necessarily show
photographic fakery. There are many options to explain
this oddity, including that Judyth did not know...especially
since she is quoted as having said conflicting things about his
"private parts."
Jack
The shaving of his pubic hair took place BEFORE Oswald was shot, by the Dallas police to gather evidence for comparison purposes.
Oswald autopsy photographic fakery? - Anthony Marsh - 15-05-2010
Dean Hagerman Wrote:I have studied the pictures very closly and I agree with Jim that either the color photo is faked or was switched
Jim I really hope you can find the picture you are talking about
I think this study is imporatant as if this photo was faked/switched it goes to prove yet another alteration in the JFK case
Just compare the color photo with the black and white photos, it is very easy to tell of the difference in size, also consider how much closer the color photo is taken of LHOs privates, the color photo should show an even larger member
Instead we see an avarage or below avarage size compared to the large size we see in the B&W photos
Jim says that his photo shows an even larger member
I hope Jim can find this photo as it will help to prove that point
The ED forum shut down this research because the Mods thought the photos were offensive
I do not agree that the photos are offensive at all, we are all adults and if we research this with respect with no jokes or slang made about LHOs privates I dont see a problem
If this photo is faked or switched then it is a huge discovery
Well, in fact posting the photos violates the child pornography law by placing photos of nudity where children can see them. 10 year sentence.
I don't object to the nudity. I object to people wasting time discussing something so trivial when there is so much work to be done.
Oswald autopsy photographic fakery? - James H. Fetzer - 15-05-2010
Good, Anthony. They may have shaved his pubic hair to make
him look less masculine. It appears to have been done after he
was dead. Judyth has denied that Lee shaved himself. I believe
her. I appreciate that Anthony has added further explanation.
Anthony Marsh Wrote:Jack White Wrote:Jim...Dr. Rose's autopsy reports the pubic hair shaved.
The photos show the same.
That Judyth Baker disputes this does not necessarily show
photographic fakery. There are many options to explain
this oddity, including that Judyth did not know...especially
since she is quoted as having said conflicting things about his
"private parts."
Jack
The Dallas police shaved Oswald's public hair for evidence.
Oswald autopsy photographic fakery? - James H. Fetzer - 15-05-2010
You have omitted the space between the legs, which was greater on the
black-and-white than in the color version. Plus, as I previously observed,
the testicles in the black-and-white appear to be larger and heavier. The
penis itself does not look the same in both either. I am not convinced.
Duncan MacRae Wrote:There's no fakery, Jim.