+- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora)
+-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: DPF Articles Discussion (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-39.html)
+--- Thread: Article: Diversity Does Not Breed Terrorism (/thread-5712.html)
Article: Diversity Does Not Breed Terrorism - Peter Presland - 07-02-2011
You can view the page at https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/content.php?200-Diversity-Does-Not-Breed-Terrorism
Article: Diversity Does Not Breed Terrorism - Jan Klimkowski - 07-02-2011
I note that PM Cameron started pushing his "multiculturalism has failed" line almost immediately after his return from the Davos Summit.
The article is entirely correct to state that:
Quote:By pinpointing the root cause of terrorism as an amorphous "state multiculturalism", Cameron reveals that his government's understanding of the problem is as simplistic as his predecessors.
Multiculturalism doesn't create "terrorists".
An honest politician might consider that the murder of civilians by the war machine and its increasingly cold-blooded weapons such as drones guided by acne-scarred computer gamers in uniform causes despair and outrage. Or that the deliberate creation of extreme poverty by the IMF, World Bank, multinationals and financial speculators creates anger and a desire for revenge. Also, that this despair and fury creates a very human need to strike back at those harming one's family and friends.
But not the British Prime Minister. No, he blames "multiculturalism".
And of course neglects to ask the Volkland security apparatus to investigate its own false flag creation: al-Muhajiroun.
Quote:Over a third of terrorism convictions between 1999 and 2009, and every single major terrorist plot in the UK including 7/7, were linked to the extremist network formerly known as al-Muhajiroun. Yet despite being proscribed, the network has never been fully investigated by police. Many of its leaders roam free despite a track record of flagrantly inciting to violence, while its spiritual leader, Omar Bakri Mohammed, was allowed to escape to Beirut despite confessing to having advanced warning of al-Qaeda plans to bomb London. Worse, the court records of the fertilizer bomb plot trial showed that another individual Mohammed Quayyum Khan, also known as Q', was an al-Qaeda go-between' who recruited the leaders of that plot and the 7/7 mission yet inexplicably remains at large.
As former Justice Department prosecutor John Loftus has noted, the fact that al-Muhajiroun had disturbing links with British security services in the Balkans during the late 1990s, as well as with repressive Western client-regimes abroad such as Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, among others, may well explain this reticence. Our links with militant Islamists during this period was motivated by the desire to use them to access strategic oil supplies in Central Asia and elsewhere, according to whistleblowers like former FBI translator Sibel Edmonds whose testimony before the 9/11 Commission and U.S. Congress is so embarrassing for the U.S.-led War on Terror' it has been retroactively classified.
Article: Diversity Does Not Breed Terrorism - Magda Hassan - 07-02-2011
I thought his speech worthy of anything coming from the BNP or EDL.
Article: Diversity Does Not Breed Terrorism - Phillip Maddison - 08-02-2011
Magda Hassan Wrote:I thought his speech worthy of anything coming from the BNP or EDL.
You have the thing backwards. The BNP and EDL exploit an anti-Islamic culture created by the establishment (and establishment political parties). Of course this came much later than the establishment created a culture of anti-Christianity and anti-Whiteness, which immigrant groups in their turn were happy to exploit. What goes around comes around.
The ending of the cycle requires that we agree on the rights of ALL peoples to control their homelands in their own interest -- including the right not to be colonised by aliens. Even the White peoples of the world and the Muslims.
Article: Diversity Does Not Breed Terrorism - Phillip Maddison - 08-02-2011
Britain's unquestioning allegiance to U.S. hegemonic ambitions in the Middle East and Central Asia
Yeah, but that's in both cases a symptom of a deeper hegemonic ambition pretty well fulfilled. British and American politicans serve Jewry. It's for Jews - who else? - that they deny their own people's desire to maintain their country's ethnic profile and instead impose policies of race-replacement while at the same time they support economically and even militarily Israel's 'right to exist as a Jewish state'.
Article: Diversity Does Not Breed Terrorism - Phillip Maddison - 08-02-2011
<i>By blaming our longstanding celebration of diversity a uniquely British value that stands us out from our European neighbours</i>
If it's uniquely British (it's not -- it's uniquely an elite/minority coalition mania and then only in the West), won't it necessarily be watered down by the input of other peoples?
In any case no-one should celebrate their displacement and dispossession by other peoples. Take it home, Nafeez ... to the homeland your people quite rightly booted us out of last century. Tell them they should have welcomed the British!