+- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora)
+-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: JFK Assassination (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-3.html)
+--- Thread: JFK Grand Jury (/thread-5749.html)
Pages:
1
2
JFK Grand Jury - Bill Kelly - 09-02-2011
To: U.S. Attorney North Texas/La./DC
We, the undersigned citizens of the United States do hereby petition you [Federal Attorney of relevant jurisdictional district] to do your duty under the law and convene a Special Federal Grand Jury to investigate the circumstances of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in Dallas, Texas on November 22, 1963, to review the available records, take the testimony of witnesses, ask the relevant questions and determine if there is enough evidence to indict any individuals for crimes related to the assassination, including homicide, conspiracy, destruction of evidence, obstruction of justice, perjury and treason, and return a true bill, in the interests of truth, justice and the restoration of public trust in government and democracy.
Sincerely,
The Undersigned
http://www.petitiononline.com/jfkgjury/petition.html
We, the undersigned citizens of the United States do hereby petition you [Federal Attorney of relevant jurisdictional district] to do your duty under the law and convene a Special Federal Grand Jury to investigate the circumstances of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in Dallas, Texas on November 22, 1963, to review the available records, take the testimony of witnesses, ask the relevant questions and determine if there is enough evidence to indict any individuals for crimes related to the assassination, including homicide, conspiracy, destruction of evidence, obstruction of justice, perjury and treason, and return a true bill, in the interests of truth, justice and the restoration of public trust in government and democracy.
Sincerely,
The Undersigned
http://www.petitiononline.com/jfkgjury/petition.html
JFK Grand Jury - Charles Drago - 09-02-2011
Thanks, Bill, for starting this thread.
JFK Grand Jury - Albert Doyle - 09-02-2011
I would think the Bolden Chicago case would be a more effective introduction to the Kennedy case because there's better evidence involved than the Tippit case. If you use the Tippit case as the source of the challenge they'll fuzz it up and say there's not enough solid evidence either way. The Bolden case is much more damning with much more obvious evidence.
In my mind they'll defeat any case based on Tippit. The Bolden case is a much better means because it would serve as good momentum to then head towards the Kennedy material after gaining a win. However I'm not sure if the Bolden case is more of a federal case, in which case would be like allowing the foxes to rule on their doings in the hen house.
Can Texas be trusted as a fair venue?
JFK Grand Jury - Peter Lemkin - 09-02-2011
Albert Doyle Wrote:I would think the Bolden Chicago case would be a more effective introduction to the Kennedy case because there's better evidence involved than the Tippit case. If you use the Tippit case as the source of the challenge they'll fuzz it up and say there's not enough solid evidence either way. The Bolden case is much more damning with much more obvious evidence.
In my mind they'll defeat any case based on Tippit. The Bolden case is a much better means because it would serve as good momentum to then head towards the Kennedy material after gaining a win. However I'm not sure if the Bolden case is more of a federal case, in which case would be like allowing the foxes to rule on their doings in the hen house.
Can Texas be trusted as a fair venue?
I agree Chicago is a good idea...how about both simultaneously in the two venues. They [THEY] are going to make it more-than-hard any way you try......Texas, especially Dallas is a horrible venue, but the entire USA is, with the possible exception of a few tiny progressive areas not relevant enough....but even those areas can be controlled. It is a noble deed Bill and I'm behind it 100% and think it must be done...this is the last window [from now to the 50th]...but warn you it will be more difficult than you think and you need some big names [in show biz; in politics; in foreign countries; in writers and thinkers; in Nobel Prize winners; in witnesses; in everything you can think of...and of course lots of average and angry to curious Americans...... You need a public and a private webpage for this - the public one with a blog. Best of luck - you/we are going to need it.
JFK Grand Jury - Bill Kelly - 09-02-2011
Peter Lemkin Wrote:Albert Doyle Wrote:I would think the Bolden Chicago case would be a more effective introduction to the Kennedy case because there's better evidence involved than the Tippit case. If you use the Tippit case as the source of the challenge they'll fuzz it up and say there's not enough solid evidence either way. The Bolden case is much more damning with much more obvious evidence.
In my mind they'll defeat any case based on Tippit. The Bolden case is a much better means because it would serve as good momentum to then head towards the Kennedy material after gaining a win. However I'm not sure if the Bolden case is more of a federal case, in which case would be like allowing the foxes to rule on their doings in the hen house.
Can Texas be trusted as a fair venue?
I agree Chicago is a good idea...how about both simultaneously in the two venues. They [THEY] are going to make it more-than-hard any way you try......Texas, especially Dallas is a horrible venue, but the entire USA is, with the possible exception of a few tiny progressive areas not relevant enough....but even those areas can be controlled. It is a noble deed Bill and I'm behind it 100% and think it must be done...this is the last window [from now to the 50th]...but warn you it will be more difficult than you think and you need some big names [in show biz; in politics; in foreign countries; in writers and thinkers; in Nobel Prize winners; in witnesses; in everything you can think of...and of course lots of average and angry to curious Americans...... You need a public and a private webpage for this - the public one with a blog. Best of luck - you/we are going to need it.
We are going to put on a full court press.
Of cousre Watkins dosn't have jurisdiciton in Chicago, that's why he should have a grand jury investigation of the Tippit murder, and there are a number of new witnesses who have never testified, a number of additional suspects other than Oswald, and it would be a case that Watkins' office could handle in house.
JFK will take a Special Federal Grand Jury, like that which was used to prosecute the assassination of the Chilian Ambassador in DC and the one Fitzgerald used to prosecute the Valarie Palme CIA leak - with a special prosecutor like Fitzgerald and the lawers who prosecuted the DC assassination (Gene Proper).
Although I won't reveal their identies, two working federal prosecutors and a retired federal DA have contacted me after reading my JFKcountercoup.blogspot articles on the Basis for Legal Action, saying they agreed with me, and would be willing to help.
One, a working asst. federal DA, wants to use the RICO stautes and the Pinkerton Doctrine to prosecute the JFK case.
The best part of getting a grand jury investigation going into either JFK or Tippit is that you don't have to convince the entire world to do it, just one person - the DA who is responsible for conveining the grand jury. Once it is done, it is an active grand jury for 18 months, and its proceedings are secret.
BK
http://jfkcountercoup.blogspot.com/2008/01/jfk-grand-jury-basis-for-legal-action.html
JFK Grand Jury - Bill Kelly - 10-02-2011
THE JFK ASSASSINATION BASIS FOR LEGAL ACTION
http://jfkcountercoup.blogspot.com/2008/01/jfk-grand-jury-basis-for-legal-action.html
It is a myth that the assassination of President Kennedy will always remain an enduring mystery. Though justice may never be served, the murder of John F. Kenney is not an unsolvable crime, but rather a homicide that can be solved to a moral and legal certainty by traditional detective work.
To keep people questioning, to allow multiple theories to abound, to let time slip away and drag on before applying the basic and routine legal procedures for investigating and solving such a crime is only a reflection of the institutional unwillingness, resistance and refusal to challenge the powers that took over the government on November 22, 1963.
The feeling of citizen helplessness is reflected in the subtitle of the book by one of the living victims of the same criminals James Tague, whose book is called The Truth Withheld A Survivor's Story Why We Will Never Know the Truth About the Assassination. But those responsible for JFK's murder win and go free only if they die before being exposed, and escape justice.
The reason for the Congressional law that established the "50 year rule" on the classification of all Congressional documents is that is the amount of time it is estimated for the people mentioned in the documents to be dead. Since it is not yet 50 years after the assassination of President Kennedy, some of those suspects are therefore still alive.
It is simply not true that the murder of JFK will forever remain a mystery, and we'll never know the truth, since thanks to the JFK Act, we have most of the evidence, the documentary records and witness testimony in the public domain.
Despite the institutional unwillingness to make the effort to solve the crime, a strong regiment of independent researchers, determined investigators, honest witnesses and ordinary citizens have taken upon themselves to determine the truth, solve the crime, but justice has yet to take its course.
"We need not accept (the) view that mankind…..is doomed," JFK said in his landmark June 10, 1963 Peace Speech' at American University. We need not accept, "that we are gripped by forces we cannot control…Our problems are manmade therefore, they can be solved by man….No problem of human destiny is beyond human beings. Man's reason and spirit have often solved the seemingly unsolvable and we believe man can do it again."
American political assassinations and murders were committed by men, and therefore can be solved by men, if only the effort is taken to do so. However belatedly, there is a new trend to at least attempt to resolve the civil rights and political murders of the 1960s, with the assassination of Medgar Evers, the murders of the Philadelphia, Mississippi Freedom Riders, the York, Pennsylvania race riot killings, the MLK assassination civil trial, and the passage of the Emmett Till Bill to establish a permenant department dedicated to such murders and assassinations all utilized the judicial system to solve crimes that were thought to be untouchable a decade ago.
The assassination of President Kennedy was not an accident of history or an act of God, but the act of man, and men can therefore solve the crime if only the effort is made to do so.
Whether the accused assassin Lee Harvey Oswald was the lone gunman as the official report alleges or a patsy as he claimed, he was a former U.S. Marine who worked with the U2 program in Japan, was trained in the Russian language, defected to the USSR, returned with a Russian wife, reportedly took a shot at General Walker, participated in covert Cuban operations in New Orleans and Mexico City, and fits the covert operative profile that makes the assassination a covert intelligence operation. As former Senator Richard Schweikder (R. Pa.) put it, the case has "the fingerprints of intelligence," and it must be properly investigated with that assumption.
Just because covert operations are designed to conceal the actual perpetuators doesn't mean that they can't be exposed, identified and brought to justice, just as other, similar covert crimes have been exposed Watergate, Iran-Contra, the assassination of the former Chilean ambassador to the U.S. in Washington, and more recent mob and terrorist conspiracies.
How can ordinary citizens force the hand of an entrenched judicial system? The system is changing, and a new guard are now at the ramparts, working on behalf of the taxpapers and citizens instead of the old political machine. There are examples of how other such political assassinations were solved through the system, and despite the system.
An examination of how the assassination of Medgar Evers and the other civil rights murders of the 1960s were resolved presents a road map to follow, and one of the first stops on the way to justice is the grand jury.
"As a general policy," former Justice Department official Ben Civiletti testified before the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) in its last session, "the Department of Justice seldom turns down at least exploring, or reviewing a petition or reasonable request,…(and)…to some extent it becomes a matter of public will…but also a matter of judgment that falls within the duties of any particular department or agency of government…as to how far questions…can be explored to a useful or fruitful purpose."
Getting questions answered, getting questions answered honestly and under oath is one thing, getting the proper questions asked in a proper legal venue is another thing all together.
Besides determining the truth and seeking justice, it would be useful and fruitful to determine who killed President Kennedy, why they did it, and how they accomplished it, so such a thing can never happen again. If the assassination of Medgar Evers was immediately pursued and justice resolved, President Kennedy would not have been killed in the same way, and if JFK's assassination was properly resolved immediately, RFK and MLK would never have died the way the did.
Political assassination remain an effective tool for controlling policy only because the true perpetuators of these crimes are permitted to remain hidden in the background, pulling the strings of the puppets and moving the pawns as they have for decades and centuries. The assassination of President Kennedy has maintained its watershed mark as the single most significant political event of the past century because it remains unresolved. Despite the tremendous amount of information that is now available, it remains an unresolved enigma and unsolved cold case homicide because there is no institutional willingness, motive or desire to simply solve it.
Unsolved cold cases, especially homicides, are usually reviewed every few years, sometimes by a new detective who looks over old evidence to see if there is anything that has been overlooked, or if there is any previously unknown evidence or witnesses, or recently developed scientific tools that could be used to help solve the crime. There is no statute of limitations on murder, under the rules of criminal procedure, homicide is given precedence over all other crimes, and once accumulated, the evidence in a homicide is presented to a grand jury by a prosecutor, district attorney, who represents the people.
Independent researchers, journalists and ordinary citizens can identify evidence, uncover conspiracies and witness crimes, but if there is no case, no grand jury, no place to present the evidence, then there is no justice. As Mr. Civiletti explained to the HSCA, the DOJ "seldom turns down exploring at least, or reviewing a petition or reasonable request…"
Towards the development of a legal case, the grand jury Petition-Request is a citizen's petition to a District Attorney responsible for prosecuting offenders to request a grand jury be convened to review the facts of a case and determine if there is enough evidence to indict someone for a crime.
A grand jury is asked to decide, not guilt or innocence, but whether there is enough evidence to have a person brought to trial for a crime. The grand jury only hears evidence of guilt, but does not render a verdict. Its decision is whether to indict, which is merely an accusation, or not to indict. Guilt or innocence is determined in a court of law; where the rules of evidence preclude hearsay evidence and allows the defense attorney the opportunity to cross-examine witnesses. Before a grand jury, hearsay is allowed, and witnesses must testify without counsel, as all attorneys, other than the prosecutor, are not permitted in the grand jury room.
If the grand jury determines there is enough evidence, they vote a "True Bill" and indict someone for a crime.
The DA can simply ignore such a citizen's petition and request and not present the evidence to a grand jury, or even if a grand jury votes to indict, it is still up to the DA to issue the indictment and proceed to take the matter to court.
The Grand Jury process, which stems from English Cannon law, has been refined by the United States Constitutional system as an extension of the prosecutor's will, though historically the grand jury can investigate official corruption, review and develop evidence, attempt to answer questions, subpoena records and witnesses, order forensic autopsies and specialized tests and follow the evidence where ever it leads.
While grand juries composed of ordinary American citizens do not have the knowledge of the history and powers of a grand jury, and are often merely tools of the prosecutors, and just do what he instructs them to do. Though sometimes a prosecutor will lose control of a grand jury, one that begins to ask questions and make requests of its own. Such a grand jury is called a "Runaway Grand Jury," and often goes beyond the original intent of the prosecutors, such as the Rocky Mountain Flats Runaway Grand Jury. When the Colorado prosecutors refused to issued the indictments against major defense contractors for environmental contamination, the grand jury leaked its report to the press [See: Westword Rocky Mountain Flats ]
The previous reluctance of district attorneys to prosecute political assassinations, especially decades old crimes, is being overcome by new, young and diversified blood in official positions of authority. Although those District Attorneys at the top of their profession know that investigating political assassinations is detrimental to furthering their careers, and witness what happened to New Orleans DA Jim Garrison, there is a younger generation of assistant prosecutors who look upon solving such major crimes as an achievement that will advance their future careers.
Former HSCA attorney, Dean Browning Webb, Esq., who specializes in RICO litigation, said that such indictments are possible and that, "I am especially interested in developing an approach to seek indictments of those who conspired to murder the President."
"I believe that a prosecution is feasible," says Webb, "especially when invoking the Pinkerton Doctrine," which holds that "a person associated with a conspiracy culpable for any criminal act committed by a co-conspirator if the act is within the scope of the conspiracy and is a foreseeable result of the criminal scheme." Agency theory holds that "all conspirators act as the agent or represent the other conspirators involved in the criminal scheme, and are liable for all criminal acts committed by the other conspirators."
Another reason that District Attorneys are reluctant to investigate and prosecute political assassination, besides opposing the criminal effort behind the murder, is the effort and manpower it takes to solve it, which takes away from the normal, day-to-day prosecutions that the District Attorney is also responsible for.
This can be compensated by including the most significant evidence, lists of documents and witnesses, and outstanding questions with the Petition-Request, laying out the case for crimes and conspiracy and reducing the work of the prosecutors. Such a convincing attachment would also help persuade a prosecutor to accept the case and take it to a grand jury.
It will only take one such JFK grand jury, and there are dozens of potential jurisdictions, with Federal, State and County grand juries, each with many assistant district attorneys who work under the District Attorney, providing dozens of individuals in which to present the Petition Request.
Establishing jurisdiction in any particular district will not be difficult. Although some will argue that it was not a federal crime to kill the president in 1963, it was a federal crime to conspire to kill a federal employee, whether it is a postman or a president.
Besides the local Dallas district, there are Texas State grand juries, as well as the North Texas Federal District court, which is located in Dallas. The reluctance of any Dallas or Texas official to investigate the assassination will probably make other jurisdictions more inviting, but new, young, district attorneys have been elected in both Dallas and New Orleans, where special grand juries could be convened.
Of the dozens of the potential jurisdictions, it will be easiest to convene a Special Federal Grand Jury in Washington D.C., where most of the original evidence is located at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), and the body of the victim can be exhumed for a proper forensic autopsy.
Although conspiracy and homicide are the crimes being investigated, once the grand jury begins to subpoena records and require the sworn testimony of witnesses, other crimes, such as perjury, destruction of evidence, obstruction of justice come into play, and help persuade witnesses to tell the truth.
One aspect of the grand jury proceedings is their secrecy, which prevents the testimony from being made public before a trial. If there are no indictments, and there isn't a trial, the grand jury could issue a report explaining what it learned and the reasons behind its action or inaction.
Historically, traditionally and legally according to the Constitution of the United States, the evidence in a homicide is presented to a grand jury, which is where the evidence in the murder of John F. Kennedy must go before there can be justice.
"That we live as a nation of laws, and are not a Banana Republic,'" said Warren Commissioner John McCloy, "requires us as individuals and as a society, to purse truth and justice, even if the heaven's may fall.'"
It is not too late now, but soon, this case will slip slowly from an unsolved homicide to an historical mystery, unless we act now, and present the best evidence in a Petition-Request to convene a special JFK Grand Jury, and let the legal take its course, wherever it may go.
Grand Jury Petition.
Federal Grand Jury Petition (Request) to evaluate the existing evidence and investigate the homicide of John F. Kennedy, the attempted murder of John B. Connolly, the wounding of James Tague and the murders of J. D. Tippit and Lee Harvey Oswald in Dallas, Texas in Nov. 1963.
[Note: Although the assassination of the President was not a federal crime in 1963, it was a federal crime to conspire to kill a federal official in the line of duty. Therefore we are submitting this petition, with evidentiary exhibits of conspiracy to Special Federal Grand Juries in the Northern District of the State of Texas, in New Orleans Parish in Louisiana and Washington D.C. requesting that a Special Federal Grand Jury be convened especially for these particular cases, guided by a Assistant U.S. Attorney and assisted by a Task Force of independent researchers, professionals, investigators, law enforcement officers and judicial officials.]
To: Richard B. Roper, U.S. Attorney for Federal District of North Texas, Earle Cabell Federal Building, 1100 Commerce St., 3rd Floor, Dallas, Texas, 75242-1699
We citizens of the United States of America do hereby petition you Richard B. Roper [U.S. Attorney for Federal District of North Texas] to fulfill your obligations [Under U.S. Code : Title 18, Section 3331(Summoning and term) 3332 (Powers & Duties) & 3331 (Reports); Or appropriate statute for correct jurisdiction]; See: Documentary Exhibits #1 (a), (b), ©] and carry out your duties to convene a grand jury of American citizens to "operate as an investigative agency…in cases of civic corruption or misconduct by public officers….to look into the criminal conduct prior to the arrest of any suspect…(since)…the inquisitorial power of the grand jury may operate to develop evidence against civic corruption, organized crime, or a broad array of criminal activity."
This request is being submitted for the purposes of:
1)Completing previously impeded official investigations; by the Dallas Police, Texas State, Secret Service, FBI, the Warren Commission, Church Intelligence Committee, Rockefeller Commission, Pike Committee, House Select Committee on Assassinations, Assassinations Records Review Board; Justice Department of the United States;
2)To determine the disposition and establish the provenance of all relevant evidence, records and witnesses;
3)To answer all outstanding questions that can be reasonably answered by basic inquiry and independent investigation (and not by agencies or departments of the government that have been implicated in the crime);
4)To have qualified experts review the available acoustic, ballistic, medical and autopsy evidence and to order new, independent studies and tests you deem necessary, including proper forensic autopsies of victims;
5)To review the available documentary records and hard evidence, subpoena witnesses, take their testimony, determine what crimes have been committed and whether there is enough evidence to indict those individuals responsible for crimes related to the assassination, including but not limited to conspiracy, homicide, treason, destruction of evidence, obstruction of justice and perjury;
6)To conduct a thorough oversight review of how and why this case was permitted to go unresolved for so long and to determine the national security implications;
7)To help restore public confidence in government, the law and the legal and
judicial systems of this country; The public confidence in the government of the United States is lower now than ever before and began to decline, according to public opinion polls, in December, 1963, directly as a result of the assassination of the President, and has never been regained, and will not be regained until the remaining questions are properly answered.
We citizens of the United States hereby present you with this petition, along with the relevant discovered evidence, records and exhibits, and respectfully request that you carry out your responsibilities under the law to convene and present them to a grand jury.
When you are finished we ask you to publicly report [Under Sec. 3333] what steps you have taken, what you have discovered and whether you have determined if indictments should be brought against any individuals for crimes related to the assassination of John F. Kennedy, 35th President of the United States.
Attached: Evidence List; Exhibits; Living Material Witness List; Living Expert Witness List; Outstanding Questions; List of Related Crimes;
William E. Kelly, Jr.
List of names of co-signers to petition.
To have your name added to petition email: Bkjfk3@yahoo.com
Petition on line:
http://www.petitiononline.com/jfkgjury/petition.html
JFK Grand Jury - Dawn Meredith - 11-02-2011
Bill this a great plan. I want to help in any way I can. This case is the reason I went to law school. I have had a legal idea for decades. Involving the Oswald kids, who along with the Kennedys have standing. But your idea is far better.
It's great to know that people from the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) are still interested in this case.
Wonder if Obama's Justice Dept. would do what Reagan's and subsequest JDs refused to do: follow the HSCA recommendations.
Dawn
JFK Grand Jury - Albert Doyle - 11-02-2011
Bully. Bolden and Bowers and to the bar!
JFK Grand Jury - Dawn Meredith - 12-02-2011
Am moving Grand Jury information from other threads to this one:
Grand Jury Efforts -Dawn Meredith
ON Feb. 5, 2011 I posted contact info for Dallas DA Craig Watkins. I also sent him a long personal message via his facebook account.
Phil Draggo sent a fax to his office.
I made this my facebook status as well, that my goal for the 50th anniversary is to have a Grand Jury review the evidence in this case, seeking not convictions but the truth.
Bill Kelly posted my my fb page and on the other thread that Watkins had appointed
someone to look into the JFk matter but that this person committed suicide.
Below is the article:
Rufus Shaw autopsy shows no cancer, murder-suicide questions remain
10:42 AM CDT on Friday, April 4, 2008
By JASON TRAHAN / The Dallas Morning News
jtrahan@dallasnews.com
An autopsy report released Thursday found that Rufus Shaw had no visible signs of cancer, raising questions about his and his wife's lives prior to their murder-suicide deaths last month.
Although Mr. Shaw's autopsy showed no obvious malignancy of the prostate gland or anywhere else, Dallas County Medical Examiner Jeffrey Barnard said cancer still might have existed on a microscopic level.
"In a shooting case, we don't normally do microscopic testing," Dr. Barnard said. "It's not pertinent to the cause and manner of death."
Cancer that had been treated might also not be visible, Dr. Barnard said. "He hadn't had surgical treatment," he added. "If he had terminal cancer, we would have seen that."
Crumbling finances, looming criminal investigations and Mr. Shaw's cancer have been cited as precursors to Mr. Shaw, 56, shooting his 53-year-old wife, Lynn Flint Shaw, then killing himself March 10 in their Red Bird-area home. Mr. Shaw was a firebrand southern-sector political commentator, and his wife was a former DART board chairwoman and political operative.
Dallas police investigators have said that the scene bore no signs of a struggle, suggesting that the couple had some sort of death pact.
Ms. Shaw was arrested earlier this year on accusations that she forged Dallas County District Attorney Craig Watkins' signature on a document to avoid repaying a $7,500 debt to a friend. She resigned as DART chairwoman in January. Hours before they died, Mr. Watkins announced that an independent prosecutor would handle the investigation.
Bodean Slaughter, who said he has been a friend of Mr. Shaw's since middle school, said he was "totally surprised" at the lack of cancer in the autopsy findings. "Both of them told me that he had cancer and that he was getting treatment at M.D. Anderson in Houston," he said.
Although he had heard that Mr. Shaw was "getting better," he understood from conversations with the both Shaws that "the cancer thing was supposed to be obvious and evident."
"I don't know what to think," Mr. Slaughter said. "The only thing I can say is they were my friends and I was there for them."
Ms. Shaw cited her husband's failing health, described later as prostate cancer, as her the reason for her dropping out of last year's Dallas City Council race. Several public officials have said they thought that Mr. Shaw had cancer.
Dallas County Commissioner John Wiley Price, a political rival of the Shaws, said the autopsy results didn't surprise him.
"I didn't believe any of it at the time, that there was anything wrong with him," Mr. Price said Thursday.
Toxicology tests revealed that neither of the Shaws had any drugs in their systems when they died.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This death would explain the look of shock I saw on Watkin's face when I met him a couple of years ago. I did not know about Shaw.
Bill Kelly would like to see the Grand Jury applied to Tippit's murder, also a good idea.
There was a lot of response on my facebook page as to this issue.
So I thought I would begin a thread so that our efforts can be documented.
Dawn
JFK Grand Jury - Dawn Meredith - 12-02-2011
Looks to me like the ACTIVE keepers of the BIG LIE are still active and alert...and doing what they've done for all these years...and that Bill Kelly, who should be given a big round of applause, has NO idea what he is up against....as I've said before...and will say again...a truthful explication of the JFK assassination would not involve the imprisonment of a few...but the total collapse of America as constituted - and those in power would rather nuke the country and all in it, before they every allow that to happen...but they have much more 'delicate' ways to control the lies from being replaced with Truth and Democracy -and thus replace the current Oligarchy, Corporatocracy, Kleptocracy and Covertocracy, which uses espionage on its own citizens, fear mongering, mind-control, propaganda, circus and no 'bread', elimination of all threats, and constant external war as control mechanisms.
Last edited by Peter Lemkin; 02-08-2011 at 03:22 PM.
Edit Post Reply With Quote Promote to Article Blog this Post
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------