NIST credibility in free-fall on WTC7 - Printable Version +- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora) +-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: 911 (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-6.html) +--- Thread: NIST credibility in free-fall on WTC7 (/thread-622.html) Pages:
1
2
|
NIST credibility in free-fall on WTC7 - Paul Rigby - 31-12-2008 Chunder & Gross - the incoherent in defence of the preposterous. Enjoy: http://visibility911.com/blog/?p=781 NIST credibility in free-fall on WTC7 - David Guyatt - 02-01-2009 Roll on Part II. What are the implications of "freefall" of WTC7? NIST credibility in free-fall on WTC7 - Peter Lemkin - 02-01-2009 David Guyatt Wrote:Roll on Part II. ...the implications are democracy, peace, civility, justice & truth in freefall..... NIST credibility in free-fall on WTC7 - Dawn Meredith - 02-01-2009 Paul Rigby Wrote:Chunder & Gross - the incoherent in defence of the preposterous. Thanks Paul. Another excellent website too. I wish there was some way we could all link to each other. Every single site on the web devoted to exposing deep political truths joined together in one common effort: shining light on the truth. That would give the PTB something to fret about. Every time I see yet another site like this I realize that our numbers are indeed growing. NIST credibility in free-fall on WTC7 - Myra Bronstein - 02-01-2009 Dawn Meredith Wrote:Thanks Paul. Another excellent website too. Yeah, after the concept of the Webring fizzled out nothing replaced it, that I'm aware of. So we end up manually creating and maintaining old fashioned Link pages. Not ideal but better than nothing. Well I'll add this site to our Links page if it's not already there. NIST credibility in free-fall on WTC7 - Paul Rigby - 02-01-2009 David Guyatt Wrote:Roll on Part II. Foundation structures were simultaneously removed by an external force or mechanism - with explosive implications, not least for NIST's credibility. Part 2: http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XtKLtUiww80 Part 3: http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=Vz43hcKYBm4 NIST: “pseudo-science in the service of an on-going cover-up,” David Chandler. NIST credibility in free-fall on WTC7 - Myra Bronstein - 02-01-2009 Paul, do you know if the NIST has ever commented on whether or not a fertilizer bomb could have brought down the federal building in Oklahoma City? NIST credibility in free-fall on WTC7 - Paul Rigby - 02-01-2009 Myra Bronstein Wrote:Paul, do you know if the NIST has ever commented on whether or not a fertilizer bomb could have brought down the federal building in Oklahoma City? Do the four names Corley, Thornton, Mlakar and Sozen ring any bells? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W._Gene_Corley Paul NIST credibility in free-fall on WTC7 - David Guyatt - 03-01-2009 All 3 parts really are very convincing visual evidence of complete bollocks in action... NIST doesn't have a leg to stand on. It reminds me of Kevin Costner telling the jurors in a court scene how an elephant can hang suspended over the edge of a cliff supported by its tail wrapped around a daisy. NIST credibility in free-fall on WTC7 - Dawn Meredith - 03-01-2009 David Guyatt Wrote:All 3 parts really are very convincing visual evidence of complete bollocks in action... NIST doesn't have a leg to stand on. Agreed. It does not get any more in your face than this. Tower 7 was their equivilant of LHO with his old Italian gun with the faulty scope. Dawn |