+- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora)
+-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: 911 (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-6.html)
+--- Thread: 9/11 - The Toronto Hearings (Laurie Manwell) (video: 1:02:58) (/thread-7702.html)
9/11 - The Toronto Hearings (Laurie Manwell) (video: 1:02:58) - Ed Jewett - 17-09-2011
9/11 - The Toronto Hearings - 09/11/11 - 11:06AM.flv (1:02:58)
Laurie Manwell on the Psychology Of Conspiracy Perception, Debate, etc.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NCY_vopQbRk&feature=player_embedded
9/11 - The Toronto Hearings (Laurie Manwell) (video: 1:02:58) - Peter Lemkin - 17-09-2011
Ed Jewett Wrote:9/11 - The Toronto Hearings - 09/11/11 - 11:06AM.flv (1:02:58)
Laurie Manwell on the Psychology Of Conspiracy Perception, Debate, etc.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NCY_vopQbRk&feature=player_embedded
Yes, a very good and important way to understand much of the resistance out there - and possible ways to work around it. There is actually a small, but growing, body of psychological papers specifically on denial/reaction-formation/and other psychological defenses to REAL conspiracies and crimes [such as Dallas/911] that don't 'fit' in with the individuals 'world view' or 'societal view'. A much larger body of literature exists on the general phenomena, which applies to anything that causes cognitive dissonance. Well worth watching. I'm trying to locate the paper she has done on this to download, if anyone has yet the url or email to get it. [she offers it in the vidoe].
9/11 - The Toronto Hearings (Laurie Manwell) (video: 1:02:58) - Ed Jewett - 17-09-2011
Peter, I didn't watch the whole video, but if you are referring to the paper entitled "In Denial of Democracy: Social Psychological Implications for Public Discourse on State Crimes Against Democracy Post 9/11" in American Behavioral Scientist Vol. 53, #6 2/2010...
I did a thread here on that publication with a review, I bought and own it, and I invited all authors to be aware of DPF and to join it, and probably still have their e-mail addresses. Purchase info was in the thread, is on the internet, etc. If all else fails and we obtain permission to post the entire paper...
9/11 - The Toronto Hearings (Laurie Manwell) (video: 1:02:58) - Peter Lemkin - 17-09-2011
Ed Jewett Wrote:Peter, I didn't watch the whole video, but if you are referring to the paper entitled "In Denial of Democracy: Social Psychological Implications for Public Discourse on State Crimes Against Democracy Post 9/11" in American Behavioral Scientist Vol. 53, #6 2/2010...
I did a thread here on that publication with a review, I bought and own it, and I invited all authors to be aware of DPF and to join it, and probably still have their e-mail addresses. Purchase info was in the thread, is on the internet, etc. If all else fails and we obtain permission to post the entire paper...
I believe she shows the paper [with cover for offprint] on the video - I'd have to look again. In the video, she said she'd provide it free to anyone who requested it. I'm broke and can't afford anything but the most essential books. I also trained in clinical psychology [along with more extensive graduate work in Environmental Science], so this is all familiar to me...I'd just like to to shove in the faces of some deniers. Some of this is also covered, generically, in a good book called 'Political Psychology' which I have.
9/11 - The Toronto Hearings (Laurie Manwell) (video: 1:02:58) - Ed Jewett - 17-09-2011
Peter, go back to the video and verify; I don't have time right now. But if you dig out the time-mark, a piece of artwork, or whatever, and it's the same one, and you write a nice letter to Santa Claus
anta:... then there maybe something stuffed in your stocking ....
9/11 - The Toronto Hearings (Laurie Manwell) (video: 1:02:58) - Anthony Thorne - 18-09-2011
I don't know if copyright issues prevent direct links (so mods, feel free to edit/adjust this post if need be) but I thread this thread, saw Pete's post, Googled the title of the paper and found it online all within about 30 seconds, so it can't be that hard to access.
[URL="https://wikispooks.com/w/images/1/1f/In_Denial_of_Democracy.pdf"]In_Denial_of_Democracy.pdf
[/URL]
9/11 - The Toronto Hearings (Laurie Manwell) (video: 1:02:58) - Ed Jewett - 23-09-2011
Thursday, September 22, 2011
Joshua Blakeney critiques Toronto hearings, pushes 9/11 truth in university newspaper
![[Image: josh+blakeney.jpeg]](http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-LHxV92srVeg/TntTN6Vz7gI/AAAAAAAAAq0/2nr1WvwXh1w/s1600/josh+blakeney.jpeg)
[URL="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-LHxV92srVeg/TntTN6Vz7gI/AAAAAAAAAq0/2nr1WvwXh1w/s1600/josh+blakeney.jpeg"]
[/URL]
Joshua Blakeney of the University of Lethbridge is well on his way to becoming the most important of the younger generation of 9/11 scholars. Joshua, who works with Professor Anthony Hall, won the Queen Elizabeth II Award for his research into 9/11 - and drew firefrom the Mossad-glorifying anti-9/11-truth propagandist Jonathan Kay.
Like me, and unlike members of the 9/11 half-truth movement,* Joshua Blakeney is on a "truth jihad" - an all-out struggle or effort to get at and speak the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth about the most important historical event of the 21st century.
Joshua just published a very stimulating critique of the Toronto 9/11 Hearings at Veterans Today, as well as a 9/11 truth broadside in the University of Lethbridge newspaper. (Leave a comment supporting Joshua!)
He will be my guest on Truth Jihad Radio next Monday, September 26th, 1-2 pm Central.
* * *
* Half-truthers include:
- People who don't want to talk about one or another aspect of 9/11 -Zionist involvement, the non-plane-crashes at the Pentagon and Shanksville, the impossible speed and/or flight paths of the planes in New York and Washington, etc. - because it would be "bad PR for the truth movement."
- People who talk about controlled demolition of the WTC but not the obvious inside-job attack at the Pentagon.
- People who blame top US officials but not top Israeli officials and their Mossad.
- People who say they know the official story is false, but they don't know who did it.
- People who admit US and/or Israelis were involved, but neglect or conceal the evidence that there were no hijackings or hijackers, and no Muslims involved; and that Bin Laden deplored 9/11 and suggested "American Jews" might be behind the attacks.
- People who obscure the evidence that there were no hijackings or hijackers by focusing on nothing but the WTC demolitions, and neglecting to point out that the fact of controlled demolition rules out human hijackings. (Humans couldn't be trusted with 100% certainty to get control of the planes and hit the targets, providing cover for the demolitions.)
- People who admit that 9/11 was an inside job, but can't let go of the Islamophobia that 9/11 instilled in the deepest recesses of their subconscious.
I don't mean to heap vilification on these people. Half a truth is better than none! As long as these folks do what they do well, and don't destructively attack others who are presenting broader aspects of the truth, we should offer them encouragement as well as friendly, constructive critiques.
Posted by Kevin Barrett at 8:25 AM 2 comments
![[Image: icon18_email.gif]](http://img1.blogblog.com/img/icon18_email.gif)
Labels: 9/11 truth, Anthony Hall, half-truthers, Joshua Blakeney, Mossad, toronto hearings, University of Lethbridge, [URL="http://truthjihad.blogspot.com/search/label/Veterans%20Today"]Veterans Today
[/URL]