Deep Politics Forum
South Africa reopens 1999 arms deal investigation - This could be fun.... - Printable Version

+- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora)
+-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: Seminal Moments of Justice (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-36.html)
+--- Thread: South Africa reopens 1999 arms deal investigation - This could be fun.... (/thread-7752.html)

South Africa reopens 1999 arms deal investigation - This could be fun.... - Magda Hassan - 20-09-2011

This has the potential to go all sorts of places they'd rather it not....
Quote:

South Africa reopens 1999 arms deal investigation

[Image: _53490583_002809570-1.jpg]Millions of dollars were spent on new fighter jets, including Swedish Gripen fighter planes
Continue reading the main story

Related Stories


South Africa's government has announced it is reopening an inquiry into a 1999 arms deal that has been surrounded with corruption allegations.
President Jacob Zuma's office announced a commission of inquiry would be set up, but gave no further details.
Mr Zuma's former financial adviser Schabir Shaik was jailed for soliciting bribes from a firm linked to the deal.
Mr Zuma was investigated for corruption over the deal, but the case was dropped before he took office in 2009.
His supporters have always maintained that he had been the victim of a political smear campaign.
The multi-billion dollar deal - post-apartheid South Africa's largest such transaction - was intended to modernise its national defences.
It involved companies from Germany, Italy, Sweden, Britain, France and South Africa.
But corruption allegations swirled around the deal from the start.
Shaik was jailed for 15 years in 2005 for soliciting a bribe from Thint, the local subsidiary of French arms company Thales.
Another official, Tony Yengeni, who was the chairman of parliament's defence committee at the time of the deal, was convicted of fraud in 2003.
Allegations that British firm BAE had a slush fund used to bribe politicians have been widely reported in South Africa.
BAE has consistently denied the claims, and said it would co-operate fully with the new inquiry.
Why now?Thursday's statement from the president's office said Mr Zuma had "taken into account the various developments around this matter and also the fact that closure on this subject will be in the public interest".
The opposition Democratic Alliance urged Mr Zuma to give the commission a "full scope to investigate any and all aspects of the arms deal and have the powers to subpoena witnesses and documentation".
BBC Southern Africa correspondent Karen Allen says that although the inquiry is being broadly welcomed by the opposition and campaign groups, many question the timing.
ANC youth league leader Julius Malema, once an ally but now an irritant to Mr Zuma, is mid-way through a disciplinary hearing and had threatened to re-open the arms deal question, she says.
There is also a pending constitutional court challenge pushing for an independent inquiry into the arms contracts.

South Africa reopens 1999 arms deal investigation - This could be fun.... - Magda Hassan - 20-09-2011

[TABLE="class: storycontent, width: 0"]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 2"]

Murky path of BAE's South Africa deal


[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: storybody"][Image: _46477257_57603207(1).jpg]South Africa signed deals to upgrade its military in 1999


The allegations against British firm BAE Systems are mounting up - slush funds, bribery and exploitation in several countries.
In South Africa, the firm was one of the suppliers in a hugely controversial upgrade of the country's armed forces.
Other elements of the deal have already spawned prosecutions, jail sentences and corruption allegations going to the very top of South African society - President Jacob Zuma.

THE ARMS DEAL
[TABLE="width: 226, align: right"]
[TR]
[TD][Image: _46477500_-127.jpg]BAE's Hawk fighters made up a large chunk of the arms deal

[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
In 1999, the South African government announced its largest-ever post-apartheid arms deal, signing contracts totalling 30bn rand ($4bn; £2.5bn at current exchange rates) to modernise its defence forces.
As well as BAE, the deal also involved companies from Germany, Italy, Sweden, France and South Africa.
Before any allegations of corruption were made, the spending of billions of dollars on new fighter jets, helicopters, submarines and warships was controversial in a country where millions live in poverty.
Critics also pointed out that there was no credible threat to South Africa's sovereignty to justify the spending.
BAE AND SOUTH AFRICA
Allegations of BAE slush funds for entertaining Saudi princes have been well documented, but so far investigators have released little information about the South African allegations.
Media reports in 2007 and 2008 suggested BAE had set up a £100m fund to bribe South African politicians.
South Africa's Mail and Guardian newspaper accused the firm of developing "a web of influence" to push through the deal.
It is claimed that the bribes were used to persuade Pretoria to take the British Hawk fighter jets rather than a much cheaper Italian alternative.
Although no South Africans have faced charges over links with BAE, intermediaries have been prosecuted over other parts of the deal.
SCHABIR SHAIK CONVICTED
[TABLE="width: 226, align: right"]
[TR]
[TD][Image: _46477441_53010384.jpg]Schabir Shaik was fred after serving 28 months of a 15-year term

[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Jacob Zuma, the current president of South Africa, was sacked as deputy president in 2005 after his financial adviser, Schabir Shaik, was convicted of fraud and corruption.
Shaik was found guilty of trying to solicit a bribe from Thint, the local subsidiary of French arms company Thales, on behalf of Mr Zuma.
The prosecution alleged Mr Zuma had agreed to shield the firm from an investigation linked to the 1999 deal in exchange for the bribe. Shaik said the money was a donation to the Jacob Zuma Education Fund.
Shaik was given a 15-year sentence and was ordered to pay $5.5m of his assets to the state.
He was freed earlier this year on medical grounds after spending less than three years in jail.
ZUMA CHARGES DROPPED
[TABLE="width: 226, align: right"]
[TR]
[TD][Image: _46477442_-118.jpg]Jacob Zuma's supporters say his enemies tried to smear him

[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
In 2006, Mr Zuma went on trial for corruption based on the Thint allegations.
But the case collapsed after the prosecution said it was not ready to proceed - even though more than a year had elapsed since he was charged.
In April 2009 prosecutors announced they would not pursue charges against Mr Zuma, concluding that there had been political manipulation in the investigation.
His supporters had always maintained that he had been the victim of a political smear campaign.
TONY YENGENI CONVICTED
[TABLE="width: 226, align: right"]
[TR]
[TD][Image: _46477443_71709628.jpg]Tony Yengeni was a prominent member of the ANC

[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Tony Yengeni was the chairman of parliament's defence committee at the time the government negotiated the arms deal, and he was convicted of fraud in 2003.
He had received a large discount on the purchase of a luxury car from one of the firms bidding for the contract.
He then lied to parliament about the benefit.
He was initially given a four-year sentence but had it reduced on appeal and further reduced by a general amnesty.
He was released in January 2007 after serving five months in jail.

[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]