+- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora)
+-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: Videos and Photographs (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-22.html)
+--- Thread: oswald and sturgis..??? (/thread-8527.html)
oswald and sturgis..??? - Bernice Moore - 18-12-2011
http://rechtiskrom.wordpress.com/2011/12/16/lee-harvey-oswald-and-frank-sturgis/
from Wim to frog......no comment...fwiw...b
question, please how tall was frank sturgis, was he really this much shorter than lho...????????
oswald and sturgis..??? - Seamus Coogan - 19-12-2011
Bernice Moore Wrote:http://rechtiskrom.wordpress.com/2011/12/16/lee-harvey-oswald-and-frank-sturgis/
from Wim to frog......no comment...fwiw...b
question, please how tall was frank sturgis, was he really this much shorter than lho...????????
Quite clearly thats Sturgis Bernice but it looks nothing like Oswald. Sturgis was at least 6ft and he was a big guy. Oswald was a runt.
oswald and sturgis..??? - Bernice Moore - 19-12-2011
Seamus Coogan Wrote:Bernice Moore Wrote:http://rechtiskrom.wordpress.com/2011/12/16/lee-harvey-oswald-and-frank-sturgis/
from Wim to frog......no comment...fwiw...b
question, please how tall was frank sturgis, was he really this much shorter than lho...????????
Quite clearly thats Sturgis Bernice but it looks nothing like Oswald. Sturgis was at least 6ft and he was a big guy. Oswald was a runt.
thanks Seamus, frog sent a short note with this yesterday, it is a frame from within the old video, i believe called THE TWO KENNEDYS http://rechtiskrom.wordpress.com/2011/12/16/lee-harvey-oswald-and-frank-sturgis/......apparently he also said that it had been sent to judyth and she said that's him..lho....i did not want to put my toe in it, but i suppose he nor they know that a few years back, this also came up on Rich's, where is that Jack ?? anyway it was a different frame, from within, and judyth was on the forum at the time, and said yes that's him, but and i think it was James Richards that came up with a better clearer frame with names etc, from within the video and it was not him.lho....she argued on and on, till i THINK not positive what settled it was, that he was somewhere else at the time of this filming, something along those lines....see why i was caring for my toe...lol..i do think i may have the frame that was originally posted at rich's tucked away i was going to, though did not get to look yesterday, but will shortly , in the frame first posted on rich's I believe the guys shown were in a different area down further more so, and in a different stance and as they were grouped differently also......if i come up with anything, i will post if not, i will contact a couple of members who may have been there and recall the thread, but i agree with you, that certainly is not lho, as well i knew Sturgis was a much bigger man, not as large as the giant Hemming but a big man.....i will check through the dungeon thanks for now..b...i do wonder why, this crap keeps coming up, things that were researched and settled years ago, but i suppose it is because newer eyes come along, sight similar and away we go again, i do wish there was a huge researchers library that contained, whatever had been researched and done away with, that we could check....so as to stop wasting anyones time, going around and around over the same old mush, but.shite continually happens.......ps I do hope your behaving well as you know who is coming soon, and he certainly will be checking your behaviour list out...:nono::cheer::rofl:b
oswald and sturgis..??? - Seamus Coogan - 19-12-2011
Bernice Moore Wrote:Seamus Coogan Wrote:[quote=Bernice Moore]http://rechtiskrom.wordpress.com/2011/12/16/lee-harvey-oswald-and-frank-sturgis/
from Wim to frog......no comment...fwiw...b
question, please how tall was frank sturgis, was he really this much shorter than lho...????????
Quite clearly thats Sturgis Bernice but it looks nothing like Oswald. Sturgis was at least 6ft and he was a big guy. Oswald was a runt.[/QUOTE
thanks Seamus, frog sent a short note with this yesterday, it is a frame from within the old video, i believe called two men in dallas......apparently he also said that it had been sent to judyth and she said that's him..lho....i did not want to put my toe in it, but i suppose he nor they know that a few years back, this also came up on Rich's, where is that Jack ?? anyway it was a different frame, from within, and judyth was on the forum at the time, and said yes that's him, but and i think it was James Richards that came up with a better clearer frame with names etc, from within the video and it was not him.lho....she argued on and on, till i THINK not positive what settled it was, that he was somewhere else at the time of this filming, something along those lines....see why i was caring for my toe...lol..i do think i may have the frame that was originally posted at rich's tucked away i was going to, though did not get to look yesterday, but will shortly , in the frame first posted on rich's I believe the guys shown were in a different area down further more so, and in a different stance and as they were grouped differently also......if i come up with anything, i will post if not, i will contact a couple of members who may have been there and recall the thread, but i agree with you, that certainly is not lho, as well i knew Sturgis was a much bigger man, not as large as the giant Hemming but a big man.....i will check through the dungeon thanks for now..b...i do wonder why, this crap keeps coming up, things that were researched and settled years ago, but i suppose it is because newer eyes come along, sight similar and away we go again, i do wish there was a huge researchers library that contained, whatever had been researched and done away with, that we could check....so as to stop wasting anyones time, going around and around over the same old mush, but.shite continually happens.......ps I do hope your behaving well as you know who is coming soon, and he certainly will be checking your behaviour list out...:nono::cheer::rofl:b
Hahahahah yeh nope I am trying my best to behave. I think I'm mild by comparison lol. Mind you I am sure he thinks the same lol.
oswald and sturgis..??? - Bernice Moore - 19-12-2011
ok i found these two, right off the bat, the gremlin is being kind today, now first off they were posted by james richards in that long ago thread, but these two were of the same frame,that they are now analyzing, of course they are, sheesh.... grey cells...???? i am looking further and or for info possibly saved from that thread, but ????? btw much better frame from james..imo...?.also the tall lookalike, i do think somewhere along the line he did id...i'm looking........i am really....:rofl:b:zzzz:
oswald and sturgis..??? - Bernice Moore - 19-12-2011
Here are just a couple of Sturgis, just to show just how SMALL he was.ha...from j.r originally.. i found no further on the frames from the two kennedys in photos, but will search elsewhere within the dank dungeons...:loco:.....:wavey::pointlaugh:
oswald and sturgis..??? - Peter Lemkin - 19-12-2011
Whether Oswald or one of his many 'doubles' or buddies, I found that film VERY interesting to watch en toto. My Italian is not good, but I got the gist of it...and some of that old footage I'd not seen in decades...a few bits I don't remember seeing before. They had the analysis of the shots down pretty well, way back then!...and their still selling bullshit for icecream here in the 'ol USA.
oswald and sturgis..??? - Keith Millea - 19-12-2011
That's supposed to be LHO?That guy wouldn't even make a good double.
oswald and sturgis..??? - Seamus Coogan - 19-12-2011
Keith Millea Wrote:That's supposed to be LHO?That guy wouldn't even make a good double.
Apparently JVB said so. Phew wee. That's some skill she has. Of course JF will be all over this. I agree with Bernice.
This stuff needs to be vaulted and catalogued as horse crap as soon as it comes up for future reference.
oswald and sturgis..??? - Bernice Moore - 19-12-2011
Here is a link to the full film on the web.....http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLpfVBiQi-Q
yes peter. it was a very interesting film back then , like so much, quite a bit was not paid attention to, for probably want of time on researchers parts,then again it was foreign made, and the feelings were, even if it is not wanted to be admitted to, it was, what do they know, it's our assassination, but they did know europe and the rest of the world always did, it seems.. i recall i had a copy when this came up at rich's and sent rich one, he at the time was very interested in all, and took some pretty good copies of some frames, and of course him being italian, he translated for us, then wondered why we all could not understand italian.like didn't the whole world ??growing up in the ward, by then i could only still understand some swear words,and even those are pretty well gone now... :cheer:b..:rofl: