Quote:Since we all saw United Flight 175 hit the South Tower on televisionand many also claim to have watched it happen with their own eyeswhat was actually going on in New York City? What did we see on television or, assuming we take the witnesses at face value, with their own eyes? There are three alternative theories, which involve the use of computer generated images (CGIs), the use of video compositing (VC), or the use of a sophisticated hologram, respectively. That third alternative may sound "far out" until you realize that many witnesses claim to have seen a plane hit the South Tower with their own eyes, which would have been impossible if VC or CGIs had been the method that was used.

Quote:"Proof Plane that Hit was Hologram"

The mission required something that looked like a real plane but could perform feats that no real plane could perform by entering the building before it would explode, which would have been impossible with a real plane. And that had to be timed to coincide with explosions in the subbasements that, even with the most meticulous planning, would inadvertently take place 14 and 17 seconds before the planes appeared to hit the buildings. It was an audacious plan, brilliant in design, and nearly perfect in execution. But those who were working this out did not realize that they were also creating the image of a plane that would turn out to be traveling faster than a Boeing 767, violating Newton's laws, and passing through its own length into the building in the same number of frames it passed through its own length it air. As in the case of the Pentagon, they thereby violated laws of aerodynamics and of physics that gave their game away. And those blemishes, subtle as they may have been, have provided the opportunity to expose a fantastic fraud, which has been used to justify wars of aggression and constraints upon civil rights that our nation continues to endure to this day.

Jeffrey Orling Wrote:One can either accept the physics which is confirmed by the observations or make up some theory about holograms to explain a massive deception created by the government for the purpose of initiating some pretty nasty policy agendas.

Or those who were interested in initiating those nasty policy agendas could have used the events regardless of who or how they were caused to achieve their goals... the sort shock doctrine / disaster capitalism that Naomi Klein writes about.

There is historical basis for false flag operations as well as shock doctrine exploitation such as Katrina. And there is good reason to suspect that the CIA etc were inside of AQ, as double agents and so forth and could have participated in plots such as the Christmas bombing on the flight to Detroit. It may be hard to determine how extensive insider involvement in the event was, but it strains credulity to accept that the entire event was a massive deception and Hollywood show with created with holograms and a cast of thousands of actors (who had no dress rehearsal either). This is not research, but mental masturbation and distraction.

Quote:9-11 No Plane Manifesto - 100% Proof

Albert Doyle Wrote:Did they also alter the videos taken from many directions and far-off places too randomly dispersed for CIA agents to scramble and collect all the loose footage?

Ed Jewett Wrote:Apparently, snide remarks constitute the best of attempts at discussion, dialogue and comprehension here.

Quote:There are three alternative theories, which involve the use of computer generated images (CGIs), the use of video compositing (VC), or the use of a sophisticated hologram, respectively. That third alternative may sound "far out" until you realize that many witnesses claim to have seen a plane hit the South Tower with their own eyes, which would have been impossible if VC or CGIs had been the method that was used.