+- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora)
+-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: JFK Assassination (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-3.html)
+--- Thread: DiEugenio rips Bill O a new one (/thread-9904.html)
DiEugenio rips Bill O a new one - Jim DiEugenio - 13-10-2012
http://consortiumnews.com/2012/10/13/bill-oreillys-outdated-killing-kennedy/
Post it around and maybe the windbag will have to face me on his show.
DiEugenio rips Bill O a new one - Albert Doyle - 13-10-2012
The Amazon marketeers took DiEugenio's review off the main page and buried it in the review pages. Remember, Amazon's purpose is to sell books. If they sense the majority of buyers like O'Reilly's stuff they'll cater the reviews towards that like for sales.
The reason Belzer made it to CNN is because their machiavellian ratings detectors sensed marketable interest in conspiracies and couldn't resist. The devils caught their own tail in their own trap.
DiEugenio rips Bill O a new one - Dawn Meredith - 13-10-2012
I posted it to my facebook page. My only "complaint" is that I wish you'd have gone more deeply into the work Billo had done. Show how he is lying against a younger Billo. You mention it but I have liked more detail. But you used the evidence well against his bs.
That sucks about Amazon. Damn!!!
Dawn
DiEugenio rips Bill O a new one - Phil Dragoo - 14-10-2012
Do I engage in Great Leaping Hyperbole!
You decide:
Amazon deleted my video review of Bill O'Reilly's book, which, at the time, was the most helpful negative review, and 2nd most helpful overall.
Luckily, I have it archived here:
http://www.krusch.com/jfk/
Bloviator Eilly puts Lee in the window
History will put the re-educationed eunuch on the Heap 'O' Asses
DiEugenio rips Bill O a new one - Albert Doyle - 17-10-2012
If you want to see the current form of Nazism in the world go to Amazon and look at the ongoing short positive review campaign for Killing Kennedy. It's obvious from the similarity of the brief reviews that an orchestrated campaign is going on.
DiEugenio rips Bill O a new one - Albert Doyle - 18-10-2012
Somebody should tell those FOX shills pumping O'Reilly's propaganda tome that Mein Kampf could use a little help too over on Amazon...
DiEugenio rips Bill O a new one - Albert Doyle - 09-06-2013
DiEugenio got booted from the Education Forum.
Very bad move based on what I see as a sculpted bias. To remove DiEugenio based on one-sided rules of conduct superficiality is to enforce content restriction under the guise of site moderation. While, like Simkin, I also disagree with DiEugenio on the matter of Mary Meyer I am wise enough to see that Mr D is a formidable assassination researcher who brings a lot more to the equation than the narrow logic that is being used to remove him. By far! To remove DiEugenio on rules of conduct when the real matter is obviously an issue of facts and opinion is to ban the strongest and most powerful tea in order to promote the weakest. While I somewhat agree with Simkin on Mr D's tendency to go too far on certain assassination issues and perhaps deny real evidence by means of hyperscrutiny of it parts, banning him is a much worse violation and will come at the expense of some of the best research pure gold available. Let the rule be free speech even if it requires having to put up with contentious disagreement. The alternative, as shown, comes at too high a price to knowledge. Common sense should make it obvious that banning the author of 'Destiny Betrayed' is bad move for whatever the reason and petty dislike of his methods is no justification. Lifton is a fool for not seeing that Priscilla Johnson McMillan is an obvious conscious and willing CIA tool. Where would we be without DiEugenio showing that?
DiEugenio rips Bill O a new one - Dawn Meredith - 09-06-2013
Albert Doyle Wrote:DiEugenio got booted from the Education Forum.
Very bad move based on what I see as a sculpted bias. To remove DiEugenio based on one-sided rules of conduct superficiality is to enforce content restriction under the guise of site moderation. While, like Simkin, I also disagree with DiEugenio on the matter of Mary Meyer I am wise enough to see that Mr D is a formidable assassination researcher who brings a lot more to the equation than the narrow logic that is being used to remove him. By far! To remove DiEugenio on rules of conduct when the real matter is obviously an issue of facts and opinion is to ban the strongest and most powerful tea in order to promote the weakest. While I somewhat agree with Simkin on Mr D's tendency to go too far on certain assassination issues and perhaps deny real evidence by means of hyperscrutiny of it parts, banning him is a much worse violation and will come at the expense of some of the best research pure gold available. Let the rule be free speech even if it requires having to put up with contentious disagreement. The alternative, as shown, comes at too high a price to knowledge. Common sense should make it obvious that banning the author of 'Destiny Betrayed' is bad move for whatever the reason and petty dislike of his methods is no justification. Lifton is a fool for not seeing that Priscilla Johnson McMillan is an obvious conscious and willing CIA tool. Where would we be without DiEugenio showing that?
If he got booted over the Pricilla JOhnson McMillan episode with Lifton and Carroll, that tells me a lot about THEM, that forum. Again.
Dawn
DiEugenio rips Bill O a new one - Magda Hassan - 09-06-2013
Albert Doyle Wrote:DiEugenio was booted from the Education Forum by Simkin.Wow. I am surprised. Stupid move. Yet look who they allow full reign there. They are supposed to be the free speech champions. Well at least Jim is in good company with other quality EF rejects. Let them keep their Mockingbirds.
Very bad move based on what I see as a sculpted bias. To remove DiEugenio based on one-sided rules of conduct superficiality is to enforce content restriction under the guise of site moderation. While, like Simkin, I also disagree with DiEugenio on the matter of Mary Meyer I am wise enough to see that Mr D is a formidable assassination researcher who brings a lot more to the equation than the narrow logic that is being used to remove him. By far! To remove DiEugenio on rules of conduct when the real matter is obviously an issue of facts and opinion is to ban the strongest and most powerful tea in order to promote the weakest. While I somewhat agree with Simkin on Mr D's tendency to go too far on certain assassination issues and perhaps deny real evidence by means of hyperscrutiny of it parts, banning him is a much worse violation and will come at the expense of some of the best research pure gold available. Let the rule be free speech even if it requires having to put up with contentious disagreement. The alternative, as shown, comes at too high a price to knowledge. Common sense should make it obvious that banning the author of 'Destiny Betrayed' is bad move for whatever the reason and petty dislike of his methods is no justification. Lifton is a fool for not seeing that Priscilla Johnson McMillan is an obvious conscious and willing CIA tool. Where would we be without DiEugenio showing that?
DiEugenio rips Bill O a new one - Albert Doyle - 09-06-2013
Jim is being banned because he clarifies muddy water too harshly. And so they choose calm muddy water over churning clear water.