21-12-2018, 09:44 AM
1) The sense I have is that second and third generation Nazi ideologues continue to control this fund but are not card carrying members of the Nazi Party. William Stevenson's The Bormann Brotherhood is also worth reading in this context.
2) Again my sense is that the board had connections going everywhere - especially in the US with the Bush family and Rockefeller's and others who were sympathetic to the Nazi's before WWII. Ditto I should think with the many members of the British elite of the day who were members of the Right Club and likewise sympathetic to Hitler's goals. The Thyssen family seem to me to have been a very powerful influence in all this as well as the earlier mention Chairman of Farben.
3) I've not done any research on Pope Francis, but Prince Bernhard owned (and holidayed at) an estate in the exact same part of Patagonia, Argentina, where Hitler lived for some years post WWII. Another visitor to that area in the late 1950's or early 1960's was a young Duke of Edinburgh, a German Prince of the House of Glucksburg. Edinburgh and Bernhard remained very close personal friends until Bernhard's death. The Lippe family - not just Prince Bernhard - is well worth researching in connection with their high-level Nazi associations.
4) My sense, again, is that German and foreign industrialists of the day were supporters of Hitler and his NSDAP because they favoured the creation of a state-business controlling elite that would dominate the world. Perhaps I'm too cynical?, but I think we largely now have that sort of ruling alliance in the West.
5) I'm inclined to agree with you on this. Higham's book was excellent but I doubt he had the deeper insights that Manning had. The latter had a second even more detailed book written and ready to to be published on this subject, but the sudden death of one of his sons caused him to shelve publication. His remaining son, in an interview with Dave Emory of Spitfire, said his dad believed his son had been murdered by the Bormann/Gestapo Mueller group because he had ignored their warning not to go ahead with this book (this interview is on Dave Emory's Spitfire List in connection with the review of Manning's book).
6) Agreed. We don't know the names of the second generation Nazi's managing the fund. My reading of the relationship between Peron, Bormann, Hitler et al is that he didn't confiscate any of their assets. Bormann paid Peron weekly, as outlined by Commissioner Jorge Silvio Colotto, in the interview conducted by Laurence de Mello.
In regard to the CIA, what connection they had with Mueller is unclear. I certainly don't buy any of fables weaved by Gregory Douglas and Robert Turnbull Crowley in this respect. Their Conversations with the Crow was, for me, nothing short of a designer deflection campaign. Having said that Manning does reveal that Mueller / Bormann had some connections to the CIA. Overall, I would argue that the CIA had a sufficiently large slush fund from the Japanese plunder trove of WWII - arguably much larger than the Nazi's loot - but possibly with some elements of Nazi plunder included.
2) Again my sense is that the board had connections going everywhere - especially in the US with the Bush family and Rockefeller's and others who were sympathetic to the Nazi's before WWII. Ditto I should think with the many members of the British elite of the day who were members of the Right Club and likewise sympathetic to Hitler's goals. The Thyssen family seem to me to have been a very powerful influence in all this as well as the earlier mention Chairman of Farben.
3) I've not done any research on Pope Francis, but Prince Bernhard owned (and holidayed at) an estate in the exact same part of Patagonia, Argentina, where Hitler lived for some years post WWII. Another visitor to that area in the late 1950's or early 1960's was a young Duke of Edinburgh, a German Prince of the House of Glucksburg. Edinburgh and Bernhard remained very close personal friends until Bernhard's death. The Lippe family - not just Prince Bernhard - is well worth researching in connection with their high-level Nazi associations.
4) My sense, again, is that German and foreign industrialists of the day were supporters of Hitler and his NSDAP because they favoured the creation of a state-business controlling elite that would dominate the world. Perhaps I'm too cynical?, but I think we largely now have that sort of ruling alliance in the West.
5) I'm inclined to agree with you on this. Higham's book was excellent but I doubt he had the deeper insights that Manning had. The latter had a second even more detailed book written and ready to to be published on this subject, but the sudden death of one of his sons caused him to shelve publication. His remaining son, in an interview with Dave Emory of Spitfire, said his dad believed his son had been murdered by the Bormann/Gestapo Mueller group because he had ignored their warning not to go ahead with this book (this interview is on Dave Emory's Spitfire List in connection with the review of Manning's book).
6) Agreed. We don't know the names of the second generation Nazi's managing the fund. My reading of the relationship between Peron, Bormann, Hitler et al is that he didn't confiscate any of their assets. Bormann paid Peron weekly, as outlined by Commissioner Jorge Silvio Colotto, in the interview conducted by Laurence de Mello.
In regard to the CIA, what connection they had with Mueller is unclear. I certainly don't buy any of fables weaved by Gregory Douglas and Robert Turnbull Crowley in this respect. Their Conversations with the Crow was, for me, nothing short of a designer deflection campaign. Having said that Manning does reveal that Mueller / Bormann had some connections to the CIA. Overall, I would argue that the CIA had a sufficiently large slush fund from the Japanese plunder trove of WWII - arguably much larger than the Nazi's loot - but possibly with some elements of Nazi plunder included.
The shadow is a moral problem that challenges the whole ego-personality, for no one can become conscious of the shadow without considerable moral effort. To become conscious of it involves recognizing the dark aspects of the personality as present and real. This act is the essential condition for any kind of self-knowledge.
Carl Jung - Aion (1951). CW 9, Part II: P.14