10-09-2017, 03:43 AM
Peter Lemkin Wrote:Scott, stop your flame war with Tom or the thread will be closed and you'll be one step away from moderation. You don't have to agree with someone [speaking to both of you - and all reading], but you can not bash another member with foul language or overly angry comments and ad hom attacks. Enough! In fact, too much.
Now that I have taken the time to listen to you, I wonder, have you ever asked yourself why I get so upset? Certainly, some folks would say because you want to make this about you, well isn't that the furthest from the truth? My next question would be, has anyone paid attention to anything I've said, or is it because some folks are too busy finding a simple way to discredit me that they're looking for shortcuts now?
I know how to handle my cool, and it can only be under control for so long before I have to explode, what Tom is giving me are not answers to any of my questions, but rather a blow up of material he enjoy's dumping without doing any real research himself, he's saying, how could this be Scott if this and that isn't happening, my (interpretation) of Tom, not that he wants to discover the truth, but rather deter me from it, but why? Well, when you think about it, the answer is rather simple, because I, (Tom) want to discredit you, (Scott) isn't that what researchers do? So, everyone can move onto the next important subject, that is until a story is told that makes it impenetrable, no defense, no offense, just a story that cannot be disputed or discredited, isn't that how it's suppose to be? Or, do we neglect what is?