12-11-2018, 03:49 AM
Phil Dagosto Wrote:I
The claim about Harriman is intriguing but even Garrison admitted it was speculation and he had no actual proof.
I approach the JFKA like any other homicide case -- thoroughly examine the physical evidence recovered with the body, and be on alert for high level liars.
Max Holland, The Assassination Tapes, pg 57:
<quote on>
At 6:55 p.m. Johnson has a ten minute meeting with Senator J. William Fulbright
and diplomat W. Averell Harriman to discuss possible foreign involvement in the
assassination, especially in light of the two-and-a-half-year sojourn of Lee Harvey
Oswald [in Russia]...Harriman, a U.S. ambassador to Moscow during WWII, is an
experienced interpreter of Soviet machinations and offers the president the
unanimous view of the U.S. government's top Kremlinologists. None of them
believe the Soviets have a hand in the assassination, despite the Oswald association.
<quote off>
Harriman lied. There was no meeting of the US Government's top Kremlinologists on 11/22/63.
Charles Bohlen was traveling in Europe, according to his biography.
George Kennan spent the day quietly at Princeton, according to his biography.
Harriman, Bohlen and Kennan were the US Gov'ts top Kremlinologists in1963.
Why did Harriman lie? He's a person of interest unless one entertains the possibility Max Holland fabricated evidence implicating Harrriman, a view I cannot buy.