02-01-2019, 06:14 AM
Jim,
So, what you're saying is that the author is basically taking what evidence there is at hand and fact check what evidence there is against the far right wing groups, rather than blaming Oswald for the assassination, but the author is going to impede his own opinion while taking his time, more than 50 years later to disclose his theories based off his research on those individuals and groups. And! The groups he believes to exposed are those who have worked for, or, was involved with the 'Deep State' and or the John Birch Society, well, forgive me for chiming in. (Will he be dropping some names)? Don't mind me, I don't know what I'm talking about anyways.
So, what you're saying is that the author is basically taking what evidence there is at hand and fact check what evidence there is against the far right wing groups, rather than blaming Oswald for the assassination, but the author is going to impede his own opinion while taking his time, more than 50 years later to disclose his theories based off his research on those individuals and groups. And! The groups he believes to exposed are those who have worked for, or, was involved with the 'Deep State' and or the John Birch Society, well, forgive me for chiming in. (Will he be dropping some names)? Don't mind me, I don't know what I'm talking about anyways.