Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Hidden Nazi: The Untold Story of America's Deal with the Devil.
#16
I agree with the following points regarding the Nazi A-Bomb and Missiles:

1. The Nazis had the best physicists in the world in the persons of Heisenberg, Otto Hahn and they had control over Nils Bohr since they occupied Denmark.

2. One of the German physicists had created the first nuclear fission reaction in a reactor in Germany before 1941.

3. Von Braun, Dornberger and friends had a plan for the "A-4" missile which theoretically could reach New York. It was on the drawing boards but never built or tested.

4. There could be a possible breakthrough in nuclear engineering which could have given the Nazis an atomic bomb with much less effort than involved in the Manhattan Project. The Union of South Africa was able to easily build their atomic weapons because they had gold mining technology which they adapted to refining uranium. This was a fortuitous development of a kind that could also have helped the Nazis.

This being said, the Nazi German intelligence and counter-intelligence was shoddy. The Abwehr (military intelligence) was headed by Admiral Canaris who was constantly trying to oppose and even rid Germany of Hitler. Also, Canaris was incompetent. They couldn't have kept spies from finding out about a nuclear bomb, nuclear test or anything like that. As for counter-intelligence, the Gestapo and the RSHA master police agency was not the greatest, either. It was full of dissension and always being reorganized and re-staffed. Likewise, it couldn't have provided an airtight cover-up of an atomic bomb project.

Theoretically, Hitler could have married his VX nerve gas with his V-2 missiles and killed everybody in London. He never would authorize that. Would Hitler have used Atom bombs, even if he had them, knowing that the enemy would be able to respond with the same sooner rather than later? Hard to know the answer to that question.

With regard to the other criticisms of my information, it would probably be helpful to people reading these pages to be more specific as to which items of my analysis of Hitler, his motives, his decisions, etc. that you don't believe or accept. I will assure you that everything I wrote about Hitler and his modus operandi has been very thoroughly researched.

Just because we all have been fed such a huge amount of lies about the actual Nazis, I realize its hard to accept reality about the Nazis. They are, unfortunately, more like cartoon characters in the minds of the American people, even very smart people like those who post here. On the contrary, the Nazis had their own airtight logic which they followed, even if they were totally lacking in conscience, ethics or morality generally speaking.

Conventional historians like William L. Shirer, Churchill, David Eisenhower, etc. tend to dismiss Hitler as an insane person, or an incompetent. But like all other humans, there are reasons behind why he did what he did. And it wasn't because he was insane or incompetent.

Why did Hitler attack the Soviet Union when every smart person on the planet knew it was doomed to fail? There were reasons which explain that.

Why was Hitler indifferent to an outcome of the War (which he started) which would end up with the partition of Germany (which everybody knew would be the result). Why didn't that matter to Hitler?

Why did Hitler glorify blonde, blue-eyed people when he was neither? There is a very rational explanation of that. And it wasn't because Hitler was crazy or delusional.

The core of my ideas which I posted center around the basic fact that both Hitler and West German Chancellor Konrad Adenauer were indifferent to a possible break-up or partition of Germany. (As Mayor of Cologne, Germany between the Wars, Adenauer had favored an independent Rhineland province and republic in which he would be living).

When Germany surrendered on November 11, 1918, not a single foreign soldier had yet reached German territory. Yet in 1945, Himmler, Goering, Shellenberger, Wolff and many other Generals were eager to surrender. But Hitler refused, even when that meant the break-up and occupation of Germany for an indefinite period. Why did Hitler follow that policy to the end?

Americans have never been informed or educated about the true answers to these any many more questions regarding Nazi Germany, or indeed about Germany generally for at least the period covering 1919 to 1963.

I will post an important page of information about the relationship between the Nazis and "Prussian Militarism" which enlightened me greatly on these issues.

(It takes a lot of research, but its better to know the accurate history than to remain like the Ostrich with one's head in a dark place).

Quoted from Federalism and Regionalism in Germany: The Decline of Prussia by Arnold Brecht (New York 1945):

Page 19

Consequently, notwithstanding the fact that in the Reichstag Social Democrats, Left Liberals, and the Catholic Center held almost a two-thirds majority of seats as early as 1912 [in the Prussian parliament], the world used to think of the German nation as dominated by Prussia, and of Prussia as given to the tradition of "Prussianism".

Page 21

PRUSSIA, PRUSSIANISM, AND THE PRUSSIANS


on 5 March 1933 the nationalistic parties, combined, failed to reach
majorities in six western districts of Prussia and in Berlin!

CONTRASTING CABINETS IN THE REICH AND IN PRUSSIA AFTER 1918

In consequence of these facts the Prussian democratic cabinets consisted without interruption of members of the Weimar coalition parties, to which two National Liberals were only temporarily added (1921 to January 1925). Social Democrat Otto Braun was prime minister from 1920 to 1933, except for a few months in 1921 and 1925. In the Reich cabinets, however, the Weimar coalition came to a sudden end as early as 1920.

No Social Democrats were in the federal cabinets from June 1920 to May 1925, from November 1922 to June 1928 (with the exception of three months in 1923), or after March 1930. Instead, the Reich cabinets included not only National Liberals (Stresemann's party, of which the majority were much more conservative than their leader) without, interruption from 1922 to the end, but also strictly anti-democratic German Nationals during considerable stretches of time (from January 1925 to January 1926, from January 1927 to June 1928, and again from May 1932 to the end).

This political difference between the two cabinets in Berlin [i.e. between Prussia and the Reich] led to a tragic dilemma. The hopes of the workers and of all democratically minded sections of the people had been traditionally with the national [Reich] government rather than with that of the once reactionary Prussia.

Many republicans now shifted their sympathy in domestic affairs from the national government to the Prussian, which showed greater fervor in defending democracy against growing reaction and fascism. It was the democratic Prussian cabinet which, as early as November 1922, outlawed the National Socialist party in Prussia, and again in 1927 outlawed the Berlin party section, and which forbade Hitler to make public speeches in Prussia from 1925 to 1928, until the failure of the other states to follow this practice and the defeat of the Nazis in the 1928 elections led to discontinuance of the ban.

It was the Prussian cabinet which in 1928 led the vote in the Federal Council against the building of the first pocket battleship (the later Deutschland); which, in contrast to the Reich cabinet, forbade members of the Prussian civil service to be members of the National Socialist party; which conducted police action against the Nazis with comparative vigor. It was against this democratic Prussian cabinet that Reich Chancellor Von Papen launched his unconstitutional attack when, on 20 July 1932, he attempted to oust its members by presidential decree.

[end of quote]

So Hitler and the Nazis were, (back in their day), anti-Prussian. That probably explains why there were so many disagreements between Hitler and the vaunted German General Staff, especially on the Russian front and on the issue of the 1941 invasion of Russia generally.

James Lateer
Reply


Messages In This Thread
The Hidden Nazi: The Untold Story of America's Deal with the Devil. - by James Lateer - 17-06-2019, 02:15 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Spy Schools: How the CIA, FBI, and Foreign Intelligence Secretly Exploit America's Universities Anthony Thorne 5 13,907 30-09-2017, 10:02 AM
Last Post: Mark A. O'Blazney
  DEATH OF A NATION: 9/11 and the Rise of Fascism in America Anthony Thorne 11 23,530 07-09-2017, 05:54 AM
Last Post: Anthony Thorne
  Eagle and Swastika: CIA and Nazi War Criminals and Collaborators Lauren Johnson 4 12,813 22-04-2017, 05:39 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  New book/documentary Hillary's America: Just a political smear. or will there be new evidence? Drew Phipps 2 6,149 12-07-2016, 05:33 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Mae Brussell: Investigations of Fascism in America Peter Lemkin 10 73,796 24-06-2016, 04:34 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Elias Davidsson's HIJACKING AMERICA'S MIND ON 9/11: Counterfeiting Evidence Anthony Thorne 10 16,903 15-03-2016, 08:36 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Allen Dulles, the OSS, and Nazi War Criminals, by Kerstin von Lingen Anthony Thorne 7 11,364 23-02-2016, 02:14 PM
Last Post: Anthony Thorne
  Covert Wars and Breakaway Civilizations: The Secret Space Program, Celestial Psyops and Hidden... Kevin O'Keeffe 3 4,372 12-05-2014, 10:04 AM
Last Post: David Guyatt
  The Communist: Frank Marshall Davis: The Untold Story of Barack Obama's Mentor Ed Jewett 5 5,520 15-12-2013, 05:15 PM
Last Post: Tracy Riddle
  Lance De Haven - Smith, Conspiracy Theory in America Albert Rossi 6 6,694 30-07-2013, 02:24 AM
Last Post: Magda Hassan

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)