29-12-2009, 02:30 AM
(This post was last modified: 05-01-2010, 06:32 AM by James H. Fetzer.)
No, I disagree--even profoundly! It renders concrete the somewhat abstract notion that our own government could participate in the assassination of our own highest elected official. It is not the core of evidence of conspiracy and cover-up, but it makes for a powerful indication of what was going on. And it does not have to be proven conclusively: the probabilistic arguments that I have already presented--with a nudge from James Richards--make the case.