Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Mr. Fetzer I have been to your site
#1
Mr. Fetzer,

I have visited the site that you gave me a link for , http://www.und.edu/org/jfkconference/ , and I notice that you do not mention that jfk was against israel obtaining a nuclear weapon. In fact jfk was not backing down from insisting that israel subject its nuclear plant at dimona to twice yearly inspections. To my knowledge that plant at dimona, to this very day, has never been inspected by anyone.

I think this is a significant event that deserves to be mentioned on your website.

How is it that today israel is suspected of having over 200 nuclear weapons if the dimona nuclear plant was devoted entirely to peaceful purposes? Lynden Johnson permitted what jfk prevented.

Here is letter that jfk wrote to the israeli prime minister demanding inspections of israels nuclear power plant. Notice the date of this letter, july 5 1963.

(I added the bold highlight)

Dear Mr. Prime Minister [Eshkol]:

It gives me great personal pleasure to extend congratulations as you assume your responsibilities as Prime Minister of Israel. You have our friendship and best wishes in your new tasks. It is on one of these that I am writing you at this time.
You are aware, I am sure, of the exchange which I had with Prime Minister Ben-Gurion concerning American visits to Israel’s nuclear facility at Dimona. Most recently, the Prime Minister wrote to me on May 27. His words reflected a most intense personal consideration of a problem that I know is not easy for your Government, as it is not for mine. We welcomed the former Prime Minister’s strong reaffirmation that Dimona will be devoted exclusively to peaceful purposes and the reaffirmation also of Israel’s willingness to permit periodic visits to Dimona.
I regret having to add to your burdens so soon after your assumption of office, but I feel the crucial importance of this problem necessitates my taking up with you at this early date certain further considerations, arising out of Mr. Ben-Gurion’s May 27 letter, as to the nature and scheduling of such visits.
I am sure you will agree that these visits should be as nearly as possible in accord with international standards, thereby resolving all doubts as to the peaceful intent of the Dimona project. As I wrote Mr. Ben-Gurion, this Government’s commitment to and support of Israel could be seriously jeopardized if it should be thought that we were unable to obtain reliable information on a subject as vital to the peace as the question of Israel’s effort in the nuclear field.
Therefore, I asked our scientists to review the alternative schedules of visits we and you had proposed. If Israel’s purposes are to be clear beyond reasonable doubt, I believe that the schedule which would best serve our common purposes would be a visit early this summer, another visit in June 1964, and thereafter at intervals of six months. I am sure that such a schedule should not cause you any more difficulty than that which Mr. Ben-Gurion proposed in his May 27 letter. It would be essential, and I understand that Mr. Ben-Gurion’s letter was in accord with this, that our scientist have access to all areas of the Dimona site and to any related part of the complex, such as fuel fabrication facilities or plutonium separation plant, and that sufficient time to be allotted for a thorough examination.
Knowing that you fully appreciate the truly vital significance of this matter to the future well-being of Israel, to the United States, and internationally, I am sure our carefully considered request will have your most sympathetic attention.
Sincerely,
John F. Kennedy
(July 5, 1963)
(Israel State Archive, Jerusalem. For more information, reference Israel and the Bomb, by Avner Cohen, pages 153-162)
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Mr. Fetzer I have been to your site - by Bob Ringler - 30-04-2010, 10:48 AM
Mr. Fetzer I have been to your site - by Mark Stapleton - 01-05-2010, 09:42 AM
Mr. Fetzer I have been to your site - by Mark Stapleton - 05-05-2010, 12:36 AM
Mr. Fetzer I have been to your site - by Mark Stapleton - 05-05-2010, 09:31 AM
Mr. Fetzer I have been to your site - by Mark Stapleton - 07-05-2010, 02:30 AM
Mr. Fetzer I have been to your site - by Mark Stapleton - 07-05-2010, 03:38 AM
Mr. Fetzer I have been to your site - by Mark Stapleton - 07-05-2010, 09:55 AM
Mr. Fetzer I have been to your site - by Mark Stapleton - 08-05-2010, 12:53 AM
Mr. Fetzer I have been to your site - by Mark Stapleton - 08-05-2010, 07:17 AM
Mr. Fetzer I have been to your site - by Mark Stapleton - 08-05-2010, 08:50 AM
Mr. Fetzer I have been to your site - by Mark Stapleton - 10-05-2010, 03:43 AM
Mr. Fetzer I have been to your site - by Mark Stapleton - 10-05-2010, 03:00 PM
Mr. Fetzer I have been to your site - by Mark Stapleton - 11-05-2010, 01:24 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  DPF Bans Professor James H. Fetzer: The Rationale The Moderators 69 361,448 04-04-2020, 09:01 AM
Last Post: Mark A. O'Blazney
  The Decline and Fall of Jim Fetzer Jim DiEugenio 132 66,150 18-03-2016, 06:51 PM
Last Post: Richard Coleman
  Is there something wrong with the MFF site? David Josephs 6 4,673 30-10-2015, 06:52 PM
Last Post: David Josephs
  From James Fetzer's Group - for those interested Adele Edisen 5 3,384 08-06-2013, 12:47 AM
Last Post: Jeffrey Orling
  Fetzer gets a listing in Urban Dictionary: 'Fetzering' is a term for talking balls. Seamus Coogan 83 19,029 26-03-2013, 11:24 PM
Last Post: John Mooney
  The Palamara, "Doyle," Fetzer, and Jeffries Dust-Ups: The Simple Reason Why Charles Drago 4 3,782 20-02-2013, 07:15 PM
Last Post: Charles Drago
  Jim Fetzer - The Tehran Tiger -- Strikes Again Charles Drago 1 2,039 19-02-2013, 07:44 PM
Last Post: Jan Klimkowski
  Fetzer Deemed "Not Credible" by Morley and Bradford; Accused of Spreading "Misinformation" and "Disi Charles Drago 33 10,521 05-01-2013, 09:32 PM
Last Post: Charles Drago
  "Cinque," Fetzer, "Doyle" and the Tactics of Subversion Charles Drago 1 3,733 13-12-2012, 01:16 AM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  Fetzer and guilt by association Greg Burnham 10 4,440 13-11-2012, 03:52 PM
Last Post: Charles Drago

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)