20-05-2011, 06:11 PM
Jean Hill testified that she saw a puff of smoke and a flash of light. When I first heard that, I thought, "Did they shoot him with Daniel Boone's rifle?". Any CIA involvement would have had a diversion. The adjective "good" CIA operative wouldn't apply. Diversion is so basic to any CIA operation. Diversion is probably taught day one at Langlee. A big explosion was not needed. Just something to draw people's attention away from what really happened. Some people do not think that Jean Hill gave a consistent story, but we can see from the photo that the diversion worked Folks were running up the grassy knoll trying to see what happened there. Everybody except signal man and umbrella man. They sit on the curb calmly looking down the road. Since we are able to see them, I believe, they were part of the diversion, too. The illusion that signal man and umbrella give is that the shooters were far away from the sight. Instead of in the lead car, driver of the limo and someone in back.
Why else would Oliver's Stone's movie be allowed to be made? It reinforces the diversion!
Why else would Oliver's Stone's movie be allowed to be made? It reinforces the diversion!