09-06-2011, 09:24 PM
Jan, we'll agree to respectfully disagree on the 9/11 analogies. [But if the administrators want to move this thread out of the 9/11 section, I raise no objection.] More than a few have painted 9/11 as a crime of financial or economic ramifications [remember the announcement on 9/10/01 by Rumsfeld about the missing trillions?], especially given the key roles given to AIG, Marsh and McLennan, the presence of Jerry Bremer on the ground in Iraq in his post-9/11 role dishing out pallets stacked with freshly-printed dollars, and more. A look at who AIG is, and was, and who formed it, is intriguing.
Elsewhere, I have also posted some of the articles by Catherine Austin Fitts on black budgets, "negative ROI", "the tapeworm", the role of the state in narcotics money laundering, etc.
I think part of the very issue involved in dissecting the 9/11 events retroactively is a) not to see them as a single entity; b) to accept or theorize that the "reasons" may have had multiple bifurcations (as you say, opportunistic actions). There's more... but we will have to let it evolve in time.
Elsewhere, I have also posted some of the articles by Catherine Austin Fitts on black budgets, "negative ROI", "the tapeworm", the role of the state in narcotics money laundering, etc.
I think part of the very issue involved in dissecting the 9/11 events retroactively is a) not to see them as a single entity; b) to accept or theorize that the "reasons" may have had multiple bifurcations (as you say, opportunistic actions). There's more... but we will have to let it evolve in time.
"Where is the intersection between the world's deep hunger and your deep gladness?"