14-09-2016, 05:49 PM
Mark A. O'Blazney Wrote:Scott Kaiser Wrote:Interesting that it's been Hunt, Sturgis and Kaiser, later, Kaiser backs out of assassinating Nixon, but who did in Kennedy?
Scott, you had a book published by Trine Day. You backed out because he (Kris) wanted to include Juduffki's lies to corroborate her 'story', correct? Now there's a BIG Convention with scads of speakers, centered around HER and her 'Lee' (gag here ) ….. so why aren't YOU there?……. this woman is a FRAUD !!! Even Jesse Ventura continues to say she is telling the truth. So does….. Fetzer. This bulls**t has got to STOP !!!
This is all about $$$--ka-ching !!
Exactly Mark... I don't give a shit about money, fortune or fame, now. Ask yourself, why isn't Scott there? I have given the research community information no one has ever known, and I published it at forums, isn't that what forums are for Tracy? Do I give a crap if someone were to steal it? No! Because I know where it came from.
I don't need to be a speaker, I don't need to flaunt myself, I have openly given you who my father was, and no one understands, my first book was a test, they failed. Now, I'm exposing everything, does there seem to be a problem with that Tracy, or, is it better I not say a word? I'm not attacking Jim, I respect him as I do everyone else here, but you have also got to understand when I tried to correct Jim and tell him that it was Mike Mansfield's report that Kennedy elected to take into consideration over the withdrawal of troops in Vietnam why could he, or anyone else believe me, yet everyone needed to defend their own honor and continue saying it was Galbraith?
I understand now Tracy, it's because everyone else is right where as Scott is always wrong is that it Tracy?