07-11-2016, 06:07 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-11-2016, 06:37 PM by Scott Kaiser.)
Quote:Albert Doyle
Member
Join DateSep 2010Posts4,700
The opposition is being allowed to lie and deny in public that Frazier's ear is visible in Darnell. Anyone can look at Darnell and see the clear division between Frazier's hair and his skin on his head. There's an undeniable skin slot on Frazier's image in Darnell for his ear as delineated by his skin/hair border. When the opposition is cornered by this argument it lies and says the ear is too small. Rubbish, anyone can see it.
If we go to Oswald's mugshot, we can see that he has a very prominent ear that would have to show similarly as Frazier's did. However we don't see that in Darnell. We see a dark mass of hair where both Oswald and Frazier would have an ear showing. The fact Frazier's ear shows up plainly in Darnell proves Darnell's equipment was capable of capturing this. So it then becomes obvious that it should have captured Oswald's ear too, if Oswald was Prayer Man.
The opposition's inability to answer this easy to see evidence should tell you all you need to know. If I had one wish it would be that people would answer good evidence like their Deep Political ethic requires.
![[Image: icon1.png]](https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.png){kind=icon}
Quote:The opposition is being allowed to lie and deny in public that Frazier's ear is visible in Darnell.
You can't be f***ing serious? Really?
If anyone here thinks my posts is [trolling] well, then, it's getting tougher and tougher for some of you to live in reality when living a fantasy is much simpler to live.
People will be wondering why I'm saying what I'm saying without reading the previous information, don't want to confuse anyone. lol....