10-12-2016, 03:58 PM
(This post was last modified: 11-12-2016, 04:35 PM by Scott Kaiser.)
Still… All talk by Mr. Best, and I use that word, [best] lightly, and no proof. So what if I copied a few words and cited the source? Big deal! Best has tried his best at lying, manipulating, even said he was familiar with a plot he never heard of then to cover his tracks he goes to the MMF foundation and types in how the FBI misspelled my father's name to look up the documents. He's a shyster, huckster, a liar, manipulator and a hustler.
Rather than "admitting" he was never familiar with the plot, he looks for evidence which he doesn't have and every excuse to cover up his bullshit. (Yeah,) he's mad because I caught him red handed stealing the Liebengood documents [I produced], then he gets upset trying to burn me, I really enjoyed his little game, but, in the end, I did give him an opportunity to back out which he elected not to. I admitted to his little game of plagiarizing and he ran with it, does he think he's the only one who looked at the manuscript before it was ever released? If he would have remembered, the information was cited. What I used out of Wikipedia I also cited the source, but, Mr. Best won't tell you that if he won't admit to covering up his own lies about a plot he never heard of.
So, he goes on, and on, and on about nothing that never existed, he uses words like plagiarize and plagiarize because that's all he's got, he can't even offer up any proof for Christ sake and yet, he's still able to have a few band of followers join in on his crusade. I know, sad, but true. I only know them by haters, after all, these are the folks who wished they lived a life I did, right Best?
For some reason he can't prove I [FONT=&]plagiarized without also adding that I mentioned the source, and anyone who knows me knows I would. But! I can prove he steals others work, documents he'll call public and call me out publicly for your amusement, AND he doesn't acknowledge where or who discovered the information, he would rather steal it! He tries to pass it off as his own work, and yet he's able to convince a few folks he's right? Boy, my father always told me to watch out for fast talkers like that, and he really was able to sucker in a few.[/FONT]
Rather than "admitting" he was never familiar with the plot, he looks for evidence which he doesn't have and every excuse to cover up his bullshit. (Yeah,) he's mad because I caught him red handed stealing the Liebengood documents [I produced], then he gets upset trying to burn me, I really enjoyed his little game, but, in the end, I did give him an opportunity to back out which he elected not to. I admitted to his little game of plagiarizing and he ran with it, does he think he's the only one who looked at the manuscript before it was ever released? If he would have remembered, the information was cited. What I used out of Wikipedia I also cited the source, but, Mr. Best won't tell you that if he won't admit to covering up his own lies about a plot he never heard of.
So, he goes on, and on, and on about nothing that never existed, he uses words like plagiarize and plagiarize because that's all he's got, he can't even offer up any proof for Christ sake and yet, he's still able to have a few band of followers join in on his crusade. I know, sad, but true. I only know them by haters, after all, these are the folks who wished they lived a life I did, right Best?
For some reason he can't prove I [FONT=&]plagiarized without also adding that I mentioned the source, and anyone who knows me knows I would. But! I can prove he steals others work, documents he'll call public and call me out publicly for your amusement, AND he doesn't acknowledge where or who discovered the information, he would rather steal it! He tries to pass it off as his own work, and yet he's able to convince a few folks he's right? Boy, my father always told me to watch out for fast talkers like that, and he really was able to sucker in a few.[/FONT]