10-12-2016, 06:35 PM
Albert Doyle Wrote:Seems like Scott does have some credible insider information, background, and experiences that deserve better than what MB has reduced them to.
To me Scott needs some serious help in determining his evidence and how to best present it. I think part of the problem is the good evidence he does have hasn't been coherently presented. Mr MB may be putting personal grudge before objective consideration.
Doyle, I'm not really sure how to approach this, for example, because I admitted to his little game, in a sense, it gave him a reason to run with it, however, if I were to walk right into a police station and confessed to killing someone I wouldn't be charged for murder.
You see, this has me in a quandary, I mean, although I did admit to playing his game, he elected to run with it with a priori assumption of the admittance and not seek the truth. I could consider that to be slander on his part.