29-04-2017, 10:12 PM
(This post was last modified: 29-04-2017, 10:41 PM by Scott Kaiser.)
There is a lot of work from this researcher who has certainly done some homework, but I do believe he gets confused when reading cables, thus many folks today make a mockery, a complete three ring circus out of Kennedy's assassination, and I find it humiliating, complete incompetence for the sole purpose of elevating ones ego.
It's a complete outright shame, a crime if you will, to create a story just to benefit ones agenda for the sole purpose of gratification and recognition.
I really don't know if I'm any different, but I will say, I don't care what people believe or think about when it comes to me or my father, but... Then again, I'm not like everyone else.
This person or researcher in his exact words says;
That is NOT what the report says, what it says is...
On November 22, 1963 that day, a report by an informant called AMYUM 19 learned from Accion, a Cuban anti-Castro group, someone by the name of (Godinez) owner of Bar Marquesa de Cuba in Madrid heard former Cuban Journalist Gaston Baquero tell one Canto believed to be Rosendo (Canto) Hernandez Editor of Accion Cubana that he received a letter stating that president Kennedy would be killed that day.
I understand how this can get a bit confusing, and because this Godinez was owner of the Bar Marquesa de Cuba in [Madrid] doesn't mean the information came from Spain.
In-fact, the information didn't come from Spain at all as this researcher is describing happened on 11/22/1963. The CIA had simply described a man who owned a bar there, received a letter from the Editor of Accion Cubana stating, the president would be assassinated that day. In-fact, the CIA still has the letter.
I wonder, who was all involved in Accion Cubana?
It's a complete outright shame, a crime if you will, to create a story just to benefit ones agenda for the sole purpose of gratification and recognition.
I really don't know if I'm any different, but I will say, I don't care what people believe or think about when it comes to me or my father, but... Then again, I'm not like everyone else.
This person or researcher in his exact words says;
Quote:In Madrid, Spain today - the CIA reports hearing from a Cuban journalist who claims to have received a letter stating that GPIDEAL [President Kennedy] will be killed today.
That is NOT what the report says, what it says is...
Quote:On 22, November reported that AMYUM 19 learned from Accion (Godinez) owner of Bar Marquesa de Cuba in Madrid heard former Cuban Journalist Gaston Baquero tell one Canto believed to be Rosendo (Canto) Hernandez Editor of Accion Cubana that he received a letter stating that president Kennedy would be killed that day.
On November 22, 1963 that day, a report by an informant called AMYUM 19 learned from Accion, a Cuban anti-Castro group, someone by the name of (Godinez) owner of Bar Marquesa de Cuba in Madrid heard former Cuban Journalist Gaston Baquero tell one Canto believed to be Rosendo (Canto) Hernandez Editor of Accion Cubana that he received a letter stating that president Kennedy would be killed that day.
I understand how this can get a bit confusing, and because this Godinez was owner of the Bar Marquesa de Cuba in [Madrid] doesn't mean the information came from Spain.
In-fact, the information didn't come from Spain at all as this researcher is describing happened on 11/22/1963. The CIA had simply described a man who owned a bar there, received a letter from the Editor of Accion Cubana stating, the president would be assassinated that day. In-fact, the CIA still has the letter.
I wonder, who was all involved in Accion Cubana?