03-05-2017, 07:41 PM
By the way, there is some good debating going on over there, for instance;
George Sawtelle says;
What George seems to have a hard time understanding is the word 'rouge.' That word is not mentioned anywhere in his paragraph.
Didn't the CIA expect war to break out with Cuba?
Didn't the CIA create propaganda to accuse Oswald?
Didn't the CIA infiltrate Garrison and the HSCA?
Didn't the CIA murder innocent folks who held unto evidence?
I could go on, but I think I've made my point.
George Sawtelle says;
Quote:[FONT=&]Ron
It's much too risky for the agency to murder a president. The CIA would be the prime suspect in the assassination. Even today without proof the CIA is the culprit. Getting rid of a president of the USA would be handled differently and has been handled differently in the past. If an ex-director of the CIA asked for help I'm sure the agency would comply. The agency would keep it's collective mouth shut and look the other way.
[/FONT]
What George seems to have a hard time understanding is the word 'rouge.' That word is not mentioned anywhere in his paragraph.
Didn't the CIA expect war to break out with Cuba?
Didn't the CIA create propaganda to accuse Oswald?
Didn't the CIA infiltrate Garrison and the HSCA?
Didn't the CIA murder innocent folks who held unto evidence?
I could go on, but I think I've made my point.